'Oh, pity, God, this miserable age!' The theme of war in Henry VI to Richard III.

Authors Avatar

‘Oh, pity, God, this miserable age!’ The theme of war in Henry VI to Richard III. 

Shakespeare is ambivalent about war. He believes that war is necessary, even laudable, for the protection of England against alien aggressors and for the defence of English interests overseas. However when England becomes embroiled in civil war, Shakespeare demonstrates its destructive power and calamitous effects upon both sides and on England as a whole. The audience is exhorted to be prepared to fight for or support England in external conflict but to view civil strife as the most pernicious of evils.

 

‘a silver sea... that serves it in the office of a wall’ protects the England of Gaunt. In Iden's garden we see a paradigm of England, which according to the proprietor is ‘worth a monarchy’. The hungry Cade represents the rapacity of alien invaders who, scaling the wall, seek ‘like a thief to come and rob’. The stalwart Iden is imbued with the imagery of land and possession in ‘feesimple’, ‘Inheritance’, ‘lord of the soil’ and ‘grounds’ and the proximity of his name Iden" to the earthly paradise ‘Eden’ would not be lost on an Elizabethan audience. The defence of land is characterised by the battle imagery of ‘iron’, ‘sword’, ‘fist’ and ‘truncheon’. The fight between Iden and Cade is a war in miniature and Iden's victory is the consummation of his vigorous defence, which is unassailable by an adversary, weakened by avarice and the exertion expended in skulking in the woods and surmounting the wall. There is a distinct parallel between Cade's situation and the illfated Spanish Armada fresh in the memory of the Elizabethan audience. Overall the scene may be viewed as an exhortation to stand firm against a malicious enemy.

 

The archetypical English soldier is Talbot, who is endowed with the chivalric virtues of courage, tenacity and conscientiousness. But when we see Talbot at the countess' castle, we find representatives of two diametrically opposed Talbot’s. One aspect of Talbot is represented by the imagery of strength in ‘Hercules’ and ‘Hector’ and the other by the imagery of weakness in the alliterative ‘weak and writhled shrimp’. The contrast is accentuated by the debate, which dwells on the antitheses of ‘shadow’ and ‘substance’. The situation is resolved when Talbot demonstrates that his substance is a host of individual soldiers all bent on the same purpose. The revelation is made more poignant by the imagery of bodily parts in ‘arms’, ‘legs’, ‘sinews’ and the like. The solitary Talbot is weak and arouses no fear in the enemy but the collective mass of Talbot’s is the strength of Englishmen joined together in a common purpose. The body parts imagery relies heavily on St Paul whose analogy of parts of the body of Christ was instrumental in exhorting the early Christians to work in harmony. Here Shakespeare similarly advocates a unity of purpose in military affairs.

Join now!

 

France has been lost by ‘want of men and money’ and England too might be lost if the Tudors cannot get men to fight. Shakespeare is the recruiting sergeant who urges men to enlist. All arguments against confronting the enemy are demolished in the stylised encounter of Talbot and son, when Young John faces inevitable death in ‘a terrible and unavoided danger’. The enticement of flight is equated with the shame of dishonour of illegitimacy in ‘make a bastard and a shame of me’. It is noticeable that the scandalous act of desecrating the corpses of the Talbot’s is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay