On dictatorship.

Having been commissioned by Mr Alderson to make some sort of attempt to give the magazine a somewhat left wing feel, I’ve decided to write about a topic to which the majority of readers know something about and can thus relate to it.  But then I decided against it…  

Living in 21st century Western Europe, in relative harmony and peace, with guarantees of freedom of speech, worship and body art, and more or less free from fear of big brother, one is perhaps understandably distant from the issue of dictatorship.  When the average self-acclaimed intellectual is put to question on the issue, they will typically throw up clichés advocating democracy, slating totalitarianism and somewhat mention human rights if they are really liberal.  It has always intrigued me that Stalin always gets brought up first in these deliberations as opposed to Hitler.  Westerners view Stalin as a larger than life demon.  He is the legend, which the children of the west in the cold war era used to scare their younger siblings into compliance.  Yet Stalin failed, in nearly every aspect, to match his Fascist counterpart.  Where the 5-year plan fell short in the USSR the economic reforms in Germany succeeded.  Where Hitler was a genius orator, Stalin was an inarticulate public speaker with a heavy Georgian accent.  And when Stalin was begging and bargaining with Britain and France for some form of security against the anti-comintern wolf pack, Hitler had the likes of Chamberlain at his fingertips.  It would seem that the anti-communist indoctrinations of the west has had a profound effect.  Some of the residuals of propaganda surrounding Stalin need to be dispelled.  He was not evil, merely criminal.  He did not possess the mentality of a great leader, merely that of a market haggler.  A maestro in the black art of backstabbing he managed to get rid opponents who far outclassed him such as Trotsky.  Distinctly lacking the ambition of Lenin or the talent of Trotsky he was a feared man, but not a respected one.  This feeble criminal does not qualify for the clichéd label of “evil dictator”.  Perhaps one might even say that he was a disgrace to Marx’s legacy.

Join now!

Tyrannical absolutists and extremists have plagued the history of mankind from the earliest of times.  From Genghis Khan to uncle Saddam, from Cromwell to Thatcher there have been established, distinct patterns of dictatorship:  

From the earliest societies there was always one individual who called the shots.  

Dictatorship is a testimony of the theory of evolution.  Dominance of the fittest and the most daring is the essence of any autocracy.  Absolute democracy will never work.  It has the habit of packing it in at the most crucial moments of decision-making and cranking out the most ridiculous vanity ...

This is a preview of the whole essay