"Parliament was of little importance in the government of England" - How valid is this view in the years 1525 to 1566?

Authors Avatar

Theo Christie

Mrs Bland

“Parliament was of little importance in the government of England” How valid is this view in the years 1525 to 1566?

Pre reformation parliaments had shown healthy institutional growth and had succeeded in achieving cooperation with the monarch.

However during the middle reign of Henry viii was a period known as the parliaments of the reformation, although occasionally called upon they did prove to be of importance in the running of the country through government. The beginning of this phase was due to the annulment with Catherine of Aragon and his infatuation with Anne Boleyn. During this period of 1529-1536 the reformation parliament only met on seven occasions.

Henry’s relationship with parliament was of great significance to the achievements of the parliament. Henry ruthlessly increased the power of royal government, using parliament to sanction his actions. Henry ruled through powerful ministers who like his six wives were never safe in their positions. His greatest achievement was to initiate the protestant reformation in England. He rejected the authority of the pope and the Roman Catholic Church, confiscated church lands, and promoted religious reformers to power.

        Beginning in 1529, Henry used parliament to exert pressure on the pope. Claiming that they were correcting abuses, the reformation parliament voted to ban payments from English bishops to Rome and to end the independence of the English clergy. Previously the clergy had owed allegiance only to the pope. By these acts Henry gained the power to appoint his own bishops; he used it to appoint one of Anne Boleyn’s friends, Thomas Cranmer, as archbishop of Canterbury.

The first session of seven occurred November to December 1529 dealt with the petitions to Henry for action against Cardinal Wolsey. A committee of peers, with two commons members, drew up a list of forty-four articles attacking Wolsey and his policies. The summoning of parliament was suggested as partly down to Henry’s previous unsuccessful attempt with the divorce of Catherine and that parliament would be used against her.

This session shows the anti-clericalism of the time, which Henry now wished to appropriate to his own use.

When Anne became pregnant in 1532 the “kings great matter” could no longer await legal resolution. Thomas Cromwell, one of the king’s advisers, led a circle of powerful politicians associated with Anne in counselling Henry to break with Rome. In addition to the laws parliament had already passed shifting religious authority to Henry, parliament passed a law prohibiting appeals to the pope in matters of marriage. In response to Henry divorcing Catherine the pope excommunicated the king and by extension the nation. Although this had little effect on the king it displeased practicing Catholics. Following the break with Rome, Henry and Cromwell undertook a reorganisation of the church and state. Henry was declared supreme head of the church in England, and all of the payments normally made to the pope now went to the crown. Parliament altered the succession to exclude Princess Mary in favour of the children of Anne Boleyn; in hopes a boy would eventually be born.

Join now!

Henry’s religious beliefs remained Catholic, despite the growing numbers of people at court and in the nation who had adopted Protestant beliefs. He prevented the more fervent of these Protestants from making radical changes to religious doctrine by instituting the Six Articles of 1539. This document outlined the tenets of the Church of England, all of which were Catholic in nature.

In 1533-1534 parliament proceeded to enact the statutory rejection of papal supremacy and the declaration of a national Catholic Church with the king as its head.

In 1534 Cromwell began a wholesale confiscation of the enormous wealth of the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

A lot can be learnt from this essay about the dangers of slipping in to narrative and missing the point of developing an argument. the writer knows a lot about the period and is able to write about the events and people of the time but they do not address the issue in the question directly enough and this could keep the essay right down in the lower levels of any mark scheme. Planning is essential and each paragraph must open with a key point relating to the argument. If the introduction sets out the argument then the writing can keep returning to it.