• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reasons for the Missouri Compromise

Extracts from this document...


How far was the Missouri Compromise driven by economic rather than moral reasons? When Congress was presented with the problem of Missouri, an area within the Louisiana Purchase requesting permission to form a constitution in preparation for admission to the Union as a state, it had to quickly seek a compromise in order to prevent already stale situations within the US getting exacerbated. Jefferson described the incident as "like a fire bell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror" for it opened up the issue of slavery being an economic v moral issue. Missouri already had a slave-owning population of more than 10,000 (16% of the total) and they wanted a further increase of slaves, as they believed it was needed due to the vast spread of cotton cultivation and the slave owning which was spreading rapidly up the Mississippi river from Alabama, Louisiana and Arkansas. ...read more.


The rapid growth of the slave-cultivated cotton industry meant that a good field hand had increased in value from "around $500 in 1814 to about $1100 dollars by early 1819". Slavery was important not only economically in the Deep South where cotton cultivation was concentrated, but also in areas like Virginia where selling on slaves to the plantations had become increasingly important as tobacco became less profitable. Restricting the expansion of slavery into new territories in the west would therefore have been a serious blow to the southern economy. Likewise, many in the south believed that the emancipation of slaves would spark racial conflict across the south and that was something they were desperate to avoid. For instance, Jefferson himself believed that by expanding slavery to the west it would dilute the numbers of slaves in each state, thereby ensuring that the local white populations could remain in control and could keep their economy functioning. ...read more.


Many of the Northerners were increasingly concerned at the disproportionate political influence of the southern slave-owning elite. The population of the north was by now far larger than that of the south, but under the constitution the south's representation in congress was larger than it might have been because 3/5ths of the slave population counted for the purposes of representation. Due to this many northerner's claimed they were fighting against slavery for "moral" reasons, whilst in reality it was purely to limit the south from becoming too powerful politically, plus the southern economy was based on the existence of slavery - if slavery was abolished the southern states would not be able to compete industrially with the north as they would not have the funds, thereby giving the north a significant advantage. Therefore it made sense for the Northern's to claim they opposed Missouri having slaves due to "moral issues" on slavery, whilst in reality it was more because of economic and political reasons. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Domestic Slavery.

    Working on the fields A large number of early settlers in America grew cotton. To grow cotton and to pick, gin (remove seeds from the white fluff) and bale it took a great deal of work. Therefore large numbers of slaves were purchased to do this work.

  2. Free essay

    The Missouri Compromise. Since the bulk of the settlers in the territory of Missouri ...

    slave state as long as Missouri didn't limit the rights of blacks or whites that immigrated into Missouri and that Maine would merge into the US as a free state (Jones 362). Even though the Missouri Compromise was very thought out, it was not the resolution to the slave predicament that people look forward to.

  1. Missouri Compromise 1820.

    Northern abolishnists fought back and said that slavery went again the fundamental priciple on which America was built on; Equality and freeddon. Not only immoral and sinful but went again the Declaration of Independece which clearly states that "all men were created equal" with no exceptions.

  2. What was the 1850 Compromise and Why did it Fail?

    This compromise said that California was to be admitted into the union as a free state; that New Mexico and Utah were to be organised into territories, allowing popular sovereignty; and as a sop to win over both sides,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work