• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Russia - Trotsky and Stalin.

Extracts from this document...


9.2.5 Russia. A I think that without Trotsky's contribution to the revolution it wouldn't of been a success I think this because Trotsky was put in charge of organising the revolution by Lenin and this might show that Lenin believed that Trotsky could do great things and this also means Lenin must of trust Trotsky as he picked him very carefully. I also think as this was a vital job Lenin must of thought that Trotsky was the best man for the job. Trotsky also had organised the Bolsheviks in Petrograd. He did this because it was the capital city and it was very important to take control of the strongest part first this showed Lenin that Trotsky was very clever. Before the revolution Trotsky trained Bolshevik agents to go into factories in Petrograd, Trotsky did this because he wanted to spread hatred against the provisional government and to tell them how to prepare for a revolution if it ever happened. He did this in factories because it was easy to spread hatred to people who were fed up and tired of slaving away and want an equal country. ...read more.


Whereas Trotsky believed that they should take over a few countries at once this was a very silly idea as they would not be able to pull it off as they were not quite big enough to do this and Lenin saw this. Stalin was a very hard worker from the beginning to the finish and he was a very healthy man around the time that Lenin died whereas Trotsky was a sick man and he also still had that glory supporter nametag. Stalin was a very sneaky person he knew what he needed to do and he did well and truly when Trotsky was very busy sorting out the revolution and being in the public eye stalin was doing the boring secretary jobs this also showed Lenin that Stalin was dedicated even to the boring jobs even though these jobs were boring and didn't seem powerful with all the jobs he did he gained quite a lot of power without anyone realising. Not only that but he worked very hard at getting political alliances and so when it came to Lenin's death surprisingly Stalin had a lot more supporters than Lenin so he was a stronger participant. ...read more.


this was called collectivisation the idea of it was to increase the amount of food grown the peasants didn't like this because they wanted to farm their own land but Stalin soon put the peasants in their place by using violence. He also did something called the five-year plans this consisted of the government setting big production targets. The workers worked very hare to achieve this and within ten years the Soviet Union had major industrial power. I think each one of these points are equally important because each one needs each other to help Stalin's power in the soviet union, because without the purges and show trials then the people who didn't support him could of made another group and taken over, without the secret police Stalin would not of been able to kill so many people, without propaganda and censorship they would have been photographs shown of Stalin being evil, radio and newspapers would tell the truth and people would think for themselves and without Stalin's economical polices the soviet union wouldn't have gained so much industrial power.i i Emma Perie 10k History coursework Mr Doyle Emma Perie History coursework Mr Doyle ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The causes of the show trials and purges of the 1930’s

    Stalin and many of his close followers.46 The trial was conducted in a whirlwind on publicity and media coverage, and it demonstrated to the citizens of the Soviet Union that the old Bolsheviks were not heroes, but instead dangerous traitors who are dealt with quickly and efficiently.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Most of European Russia was destroyed. Most of the advances of the 1930s were wiped out. What effects did the war have on Stalin? * During the war the Soviet people suffered terribly. This made Stalin determined that this should never happen again.

  1. The enormous role that Trotsky played in the success of the Bolsheviks up until ...

    He proved himself to be both a trustworthy and irreplaceable member of the Bolshevik party. This was shown by the immense number of highly important tasks that he was made responsible for. Perhaps it was Trotsky's ability to play so many different roles, negotiator, strategist, diplomat, and leader that made him so successful.

  2. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    As the triumvirate took form, Trotsky was plainly the most important figure outside it. But no one regarded Stalin as the most eminent of the three. Zinoviev, especially, had an international prestige which Stalin lacked, while both Kamenev and he were regarded as theorists in a way Stalin was not--and a Communist leader had to be a theorist.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    effort to perform the 'Party purges' more effectively a Central Purging Commission (CPC) was established[30], and quickly became very effective in eliminating unwanted elements of the Party in rural Russia. This commission acted very efficiently and on January 17, 1934, Stalin announced on behalf of the CPC that the 'Party

  2. Blitzkrieg coursework

    After this initial breakthrough, in the early minutes of June 25th after the rest of France had been invaded southwards and the French government has withdrew to North Africa and had asked for an armistice on June 17th France lay prostratThe German army was well equipped in terms of artillery, manpower, air strength, armored vehicles and manpower.

  1. Blitzkreig coursework

    After invading Belgium on May 10th 1940 from the eastern frontier of Luxembourg the Germans had advanced across Northern Luxembourg, through the natural defenses of the Ardennes Forest to Sedan in France and advanced Northwards to the English Channel, occupying Abbeville on May 20th, a total of 240 miles, in11 days.

  2. History Coursework Sources Questions - Stalin and Trotsky

    This postscript was one way he hoped he could prevent Stalin from succeeding him. Source B was written partly as a reply to Stalin's rudeness towards his wife, and partly as this as the final straw and he didn't want Stalin to rise to power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work