• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe The revolutions of 1989 that brought down communism in Eastern Europe seem to have been inevitable. By that year, the corruption, economic decay and staleness of the ideology had become apparent to all. And when the masses took to the streets, the "people's republics" fell like a deck of cards across the continent. With hindsight, several dates and events that preceded 1989 can be plucked from history. Whether it is Hungary's uprising in 1956 or the Prague Spring of 1968, the birth of Solidarity in 1980, or the unleashing of glasnost by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev - all bore the seeds of future revolution. The fall of communism in Eastern Europe was caused by a lot of events that built up over time. There were long term causes, medium term causes and short term causes. I am going to discuss what exactly caused the fall of communism in Eastern Europe. In 1953, Joseph Stalin, hard communist leader of the Soviet Union died. A man named Nikita Khrushchev succeeded him. Khrushchev seemed very different to Stalin. He put an end to the feuds between the USSR and China and with Yugoslavia. ...read more.

Middle

Was there opposition is Czechoslovakia because people were scared of change? Or was it because the economy was in a bad way and there were problems with the living conditions? People who believed that the communists had not led the country forward led the Czech opposition. Seeing as censorship had been eased, they were able to launch attacks on the Communist leaders, saying that they were corrupt and useless. This period of time became known as the Prague Spring, because of all the new ideas that were around. By the summer there was talk of allowing another political party, the Social Democratic party to be set up as a rival to the communist party. The USSR was suspicious of these changes. Czechoslovakia was a very important part of the Warsaw Pact. The soviets did not want the ideas in Czechoslovakia spreading into other countries in Eastern Europe. The USSR tried various methods in response. They tried to slow Dubcek down, arguing with him and getting Soviet, Polish and East German troops to perform very public training exercises on the Czech border. In July, it was decided that there would be no Social Democratic Party, however, Dubcek insisted on keeping most of his reforms. ...read more.

Conclusion

By the end of 1989, not only Germany had seen a revolution, but Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria had also disposed of their Communist governments. During the Brezhnev and Gorbachev years, the ideology behind Communism had a different meaning in comparison to earlier times. Wherever the faithful looked, the traditional prophecies had failed to come through: world revolution had not occurred, crime had not vanished, nationalism and religion had not disappeared with the passing of capitalism, as had been predicted. This disillusionment and belief that Communism didn't fulfil its promises to the people jumped to new highs when Mikhail Gorbachev came to power during the late 1980's. His liberalised style of leadership allowed people express their views and generally the people of the Soviet Union felt wrong done by the ideology which they had be ensured would see the Soviet Union rise as the most powerful nation in the world. The Soviet system was not suited to the ideology on which the regime was based. This ideology turned out to be inappropriate to the end of the twentieth century. As technology changed and as society was transformed, the superstructure - that is, the form of state and its ideology - became a hindrance to further development. This hindrance became a burden on the society the economy and the system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. "To What Extent Were Gorbachev's Policies the Catalyst to the Fall of the USSR?"

    This would coincide with the technological blockade24, rendering them obsolete in military terms as in vital economical aspects (See below). As for the economy, the author explains, the main aspect was to destroy the oil and gas exports which meant $30 Billion per year25.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau was nick-named 'the Tiger'. He represented the aims of most Frenchmen and was determined that Germany should be punished. Any idea that Germany should be let off easily would have been unacceptable to him Germany had to pay for the cost of the

  1. How important were developments in Eastern Europe to the collapse of the Soviet Union?

    reawakened in 1989, stepping up public pressure on the Soviets to grant independence to Lithuania. Once Romania's Ceausescu was overthrown, the Moldavian Popular Front stepped up the efforts to be aligned with the new Romania as the disincentive to be independent under Securitate-ridden old Romania no longer existed.

  2. Gorbachev(TM)s reforms and policies, which were intended originally to strengthen the Soviet system, eventually ...

    The growing nationalism threatened the existence the disunited and multinational USSR which eventually collapsed under the pressure of nationalism. Another unintended effect of Gorbachev's reforms was the political opposition that resulted from his policies. Conversely, to some people such as Boris Yeltsin and anti-communist intellectuals, Gorbachev seemed to be going too slowly in his reforms.

  1. The Fall of Classical Greece

    There were generally no surprises and winning was determined on the individual strength and resolve of the men. Battles were usually over in a matter of minutes15. But at the Battle of Delium the Boetians charged downhill towards the Athenian army and eliminated it.

  2. Soviet interest in Eastern Europe served to strengthen the communist bloc.' Discuss this statement ...

    The demands of the East Germans were broadcast on American-funded Radio Free Europe. As manifested by anti-Soviet rioting in Czechoslovakia and Eastern Germany, the exploitative tendencies of Stalin had resulted in rampant suffering and hardship that had resulted in cracks in the grand pillars of the Soviet sphere.

  1. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    Therefore Vladimir Putin, who indicates a return to authoritarian rule, whereby media production is censored and suppression of regional provinces (such as Dagestan and Chechnya?s) right to self-governing bodies, may indicate a leadership were comprehension of the consequences of totalitarian rule verses increased civil liberty, are not correctly identified.

  2. Why did Deng Xiaoping survive the crisis of communism whilst Mikhail Gorbachev did ...

    To make matters worse, the communities who had been submitted to the GLF policy suffered severe droughts which decimated crops and left people hungry. To attempt to remedy these issues, Xiaoping abolished the communal system of agriculture and reissued the peasants with their private plots of land.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work