• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The fall of the Duke of Somerset was principally a result of the impact of the 1549 rebellions. How valid is this view?

Extracts from this document...


David Creed Independent Study ?The fall of the Duke of Somerset was principally a result of the impact of the 1549 rebellions?. How valid is this view? (45 Marks) 1549, the year England was so nearly torn apart my numerous rebellions. Somerset suddenly became the ?good duke gone bad? and England stood on the edge of a class war. These rebellions proved to be Somerset?s last nail in the coffin, however was it the rebellions which principally caused his downfall? Could it possibly have been through his the shambles of the Scottish War and his overall foreign policy which resulted in his downfall? Or possibly his downfall was caused by the unpopular religious reformation or economic policies. Personally I believe the fall of the Duke of Somerset was due to his own inadequacy as a ruler. I will show you why I believe this in this essay. In terms of the rebellions, Somerset?s image was wounded badly; the rebellions made him look both weak and indecisive. The council believed he was at entire fault for these rebellions and accused him of being far too lenient with the commoners. Somerset had made it clear to the commoners that he was very anti-enclosures and even described them as ?the Devil?s works?. ...read more.


The Earl of Southampton was seen as Somerset’s main opposition. Warwick was a power hungry Machiavellian. As soon as he saw Somerset begins to stutter and buckle under pressure he got in contact with Southampton on how to bring him down. With people such as Cranmer on their side alongside Arundel, Somerset had no chance. He was cornered into surrender. Therefore it can be believed that Somerset only lost power due to his opposition forcing him into a position where had no choice but to give that power up. I believe that Somerset’s foreign policy was a huge factor in his downfall especially with regard to the War in Scotland. Somerset had already been proven as quite the warmonger from the years of Henry; however the war in Scotland was seen as an obsession. In reality Somerset lacked huge perspective in this war; he was fighting a losing battle the whole time. With the French allying with the Scots and England not having the finances for this war it was just a recipe for disaster. The war itself cost an astonishing £580,593 leaving Somerset following Henry’s policy of debasement and causing further problems for the people back in England. ...read more.


Due to Somerset not delegating with anyone he was left liable for anything which went wrong. He made enemies on the council such as Southampton who were powerful men who would eventually be part in the coup that overthrew Somerset. Somerset also ruled from Somerset house and used his servants as the council. This left many people angered as he wasn?t the king and he was acting as if he was. Paget had even said to Somerset that if he ruled under his advice he wouldn?t lose power. In conclusion I think all of these factors led to the fall of Somerset, it must be stressed that the role Somerset took on put him in a position where it seemed destined to fail. Henry had left the country in economic crisis and the War in Scotland didn?t just disappear. However I believe Somerset made matters harder on himself by refusing to delegate with the rest of the council. Personally I believe his style of rule was the cause of his fall. His style of rule not only caused a lot of these problems but also left him solely accountable for the blame as important as the rebellions were I believe that they were just the final nail in the coffin. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To what extent was the Western Rebellion of 1549 caused by religious grievances? The ...

    The country was moving towards Protestantism, but it was slow and cautious, which was a sensible policy as people resisted changes in their traditions. In Western Rebellion the influence of the priests on the programme was clearly paramount, and general discontent was mobilized against the new services, seen as the

  2. How far do you agree with Elton's interpretation of the roles of Somerset and ...

    His poor management of the economy and heavy-handed measures of control hit those most in need the hardest. This demonstrates almost a total disregard for the needs of the poor; furthermore, anyone regarded as a humanitarian reformer, or at least a man with good intentions, would be incapable of passing the Vagrancy Act.

  1. How far does Somerset deserve his reputation as the Good Duke? (Somerset (then known ...

    It seems right to suggest that the power Somerset held had gotten to his head - where every policy he wrote, decision he made, and action he took were nothing but his own, and this can be an argument opposing the title of the 'Good Duke' he has earned by

  2. To what extent was the Western Rebellion of 1549 caused by religious grievances?

    The new prayer book was not uniformly adopted in 1549 the Act of Uniformity, which stated that the worship of saint was to be discouraged, status, paintings and other similar artifacts were to be removed from the church, made it illegal to use the old one.

  1. Was the Henrician Reformation inevitable?

    "it is therefore ordained and established...that the unlawful payments of Annates....shall from henceforth utterly cease...or hereafter in this present act is declared11" The act was not to come into force until Henry himself issued the letters, to allow more time for negotiations with Rome ; it was hoped that the

  2. An unmitigated disaster. How valid is this assessment of Oliver Cromwells experiment with the ...

    Though, he may have felt they were too weak to do so, he may have ne scared of being unpopular or being hurt himself in a response to his actions, or he may have just wanted to carry out his tasks legally.

  1. In your opinion, who is most to blame for the outcome in “On the ...

    This leads the story to bring in pleasure, as imagery. It could mean the pleasure they are having because they are at the funfair and having fun, or they pleasure they are having because they are together and the pleasure is the feeling/emotion they have.

  2. Using sources 1, 2 and 3 and your own knowledge: Were the changes in ...

    changes more as suggestions for improvement, and the true issue being social, economic and political problems, such as ?enclosures? and ?rent?. Economic and social issues simply were not seen as a problem associated with the Western Rebellion, especially as land use was not argued over often, and ?intruded? gentry was comparatively rare.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work