The Indian Mutiny

Authors Avatar

From 1601 to the 1750s, British involvement in India was limited to a trading agreement where the EIC controlled all trading from Europe to Asia, allowing it to become the world's largest and most powerful companies. However, when Britain became involved in the nation's social and cultural practices, one of the world's most destructive mutinies arose.

 

Over time, the EIC became involved in India's politics, culture and social practices all leading to Indian mutiny. However, the Company's initial interest in the nation was purely economic and as their profit increased, so did their power. The Company's control resulted in many changes in the country, such as the ability trade possessed to transform small villages into large towns and the loss of village self-sufficiency due to improvements in communication and transport. The developments of the industrial revolution allowed Britain to by lots of raw materials and manufacture it themselves for a lower cost. This forced the closure for the demand for manufactured goods, resulting in the loss of Indian income and a significant gain in British revenue. Another main cause of the Indian mutiny was the fixed land tax the Indian peasants were forced to pay , rather than tax based on their income. Therefore, if their crop had not produced the same amount of money as years before, they were still required to pay the same tax, creating a large burden on their already decreasing income. The increase in the Company's economic power and control resulted in hardship for the Indian people and this became a major cause of the Indian mutiny.

 

The Company's flourishing economic status resulted in a British attitude of superiority, demonstrated through their confident involvement in the Indian government. Prior to the EIC, in India The Mogul Empire was the dominant political organisation and has been maintaining its stability and strength. However, as a result of the British presence in India, the Mughal empire had disintegrated and was being replaced by a variety of regional states. The Indians remained as 'puppet rulers' when the British took control. The Indians still has 'official' control, though they were aware that they had to abide by British rules in order to continue their economic relationship. This worked at an advantage to the British, as it appeased the Indians to know people from their country still had the official power, though later this was not enough for the British and they introduced Annexation, a method where the company would claim the province by introducing troops and "attaching" themselves to the land, meaning native rulers were simply disposed of. This is believed to be on the of the main causes of the Indian mutiny as the British were ignoring a treaty that had been honoured for more than half a century and displaying their arrogance. The Doctrine of Lapse was the method where if a ruler did not have a legitimate heir, their inheritance of land and money went to the company after the individual’s death and this also caused a lot of anger and resentment towards the British. The EIC's discontentment with their control India's trade led to their involvement in the political system, angering the Indian population.

Join now!

 

Britain's arrogance was also displayed in their social interaction with the Indian people. During the early stages of British presence, the Indians and Europeans developed a good relationship based on mutual respect and curiosity. However, as the EIC gained control they began to see the Indian's as inferior, employing them as servants and maids. The introduction of Waghorn's short cut to India Europeans encouraged more women to sail to India, drastically changing the way men were ruling India. The arrival of women influenced the use of cantonments, which were usually on the outskirts of cities, meaning European women had ...

This is a preview of the whole essay