The main attraction was its opposition to Communism. How far do you agree with this judgment on the appeal of Fascism in Italy in the early 1920s?

Authors Avatar

The main attraction was its opposition to Communism. How far do you agree with this judgment on the appeal of Fascism in Italy in the early 1920s?

 

In post-war Italy the aggressive rise of the left was the main feature of the political landscape leading to alarm for the middle and upper classes. They wanted a fast and counter-revolutionary response which the weak Liberals could not, or were not willing to, provide. Mussolini, a former socialist introduced Fascism which was a dynamic, radical and direct answer to the growing problem of Communism. Fascism appealed to many people.

Communism was a huge threat to the middle and upper classes, the elites and the King. These groups needed an effective response to Communism and the Liberals were too stiff and weak to provide it. The Liberals’ critical mistake was that they did not address the crucial issues before they became problems. Before Italy went to war the Liberals had made little effort to centralise any Italian identity. The problems in this respect recall the words of the founding father of the Risorgimento, Mazzini, who said in the 1860s that Italy was merely a geographical expression. The Risorgimento caused such upset because the masses did not have the vote; they were not deemed intelligent or responsible enough. They therefore felt no real sense of being Italian, and no loyalty, therefore, to the government. When the government did introduce mass suffrage for men it was too late and the populace wanted a more Socialist government.

In 1895 the PSI formed with a maximalist wing committed to non co-operation, class struggle and republicanism. There was a decline in popularity for the Liberals because they stood for the commercial elite. The problems of lack of national identity were only highlighted when Italy emerged from the war with huge debts. The Liberals were saddled with the blame for the mutilated victory. The workers and peasants were the ones who had fought in the war and wanted the land and recognition for which they had struggled. The concession to Italy of Dalmatia, Fiume and other territories in Africa and Asia did not materialise because Woodrow Wilson’s belief in nations’ self-determination superseded it. In the context of this, the Liberals’ apparently impotent bluster merely added to their lack of legitimacy.

Join now!

Between 1913 and 1919 the cost of living increased by 400% because of the distorted and weak economy. The described factors led to frustration and despair among the electorate (the majority of whom were not middle class etc). This was reflected in the vote in 1919 in which the PSI won 156 seats in the proportional vote. The PPI was formed in January 1919 with the Pope’s blessing in order to combat the PSI (PSI was a threat the Pope); they won 100 seats in the election. The shift in mass democracy meant that the Liberals were now a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay