To What Extent can it be Argued that the North was Better Prepared to Fight and Win the Civil War in 1861?

Authors Avatar

To What Extent can it be Argued that the North was Better Prepared to Fight and Win the Civil War in 1861?

At the outbreak of Civil War in 1861 the North had a greater industrial capacity, a larger army and a government infrastructure already in place.  The South on the other hand had very little industrial capacity, a much smaller army and navy, and had to build a government from scratch.  The North appeared to be much better prepared to fight and win the Civil War. The South did still have several advantages however; not least the fact that they did not need to beat the Union, just outlast it.

        

The North easily had the odds in its favour at the outset of war; including greater manpower and more resources. However resources on their own do not win wars, they need efficient management; and most historians believe that the Northern government handled the war well. Lincoln was fortunate in the fact that he took over a ‘going’ concern. Unlike the Southern government, most of the infrastructure of government in the North was already in place.  This meant that politically the North were better prepared to fight the war. Generally opposition to Lincoln was responsible, disciplined and for the most part loyal. This helped to unify the Northern war effort. Democrat criticism helped keep the government ‘honest’ and kept civil liberty in the public eye, and also helped unify Republican state officials and Lincoln’s administration. Lincoln did provide strong leadership but his administration did relatively little to manage the economic resources, and in a sense the Northern economy ran itself. The fact that Lincoln took over a ‘going concern’ mean the North were better prepared politically to fight and win. This was a fairly important advantage.

There were 22,000,000 people in the North compared with only 9,000,000 in the South (of whom only 5,500,000 were whites), with fifty percent of men in the North leaving their homes to fight, forty percent in the South. These two figures gave the North a considerable manpower advantage, as the Confederacy could only call on about 2,000,000 men of military age to fight, the Union 7,000,000. As well as this, a majority of men in the US regular army remained loyal to the Union, and so did a large percentage of officers. Just because they had a manpower advantage does not mean the Union army was more prepared to fight a war however. They had only a small regular army, most of which were scattered in frontier points out West, and Lincoln had no military experience and a very small war department. They did have a bigger and better equipped army though and also ruled the waves. The Northern navy was able to impose an increasingly tight blockade, as well as attacking Confederate ports and coastline and also enjoying supremacy on the Mississippi and its tributaries. Generally the North were militarily better prepared to fight and win the civil war, and this was probably their greatest advantage.

Join now!

The North was overwhelmingly rural but still had a much greater industrial capacity than the South. It had ten times its productive capacity and six times as many factories. The North contained twice as many miles of railway track as the South and even in agriculture enjoyed an edge, producing over 80% of the countries wheat and oats. The North’s booming war economy was able to produce ‘guns and ‘butter’ and the Northern economy was generally more prepared for a war. Reforms were also introduced to help aid agriculture and industry. The fact that the North were industrially better prepared ...

This is a preview of the whole essay