• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Russia simply exchange one authoritarian regime for another in the 1855-1964 period?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did Russia simply exchange one authoritarian regime for another in the 1855-1964 period? When the February revolution brought an end to Tsarist rule, there was a strong belief that the instatement of the Provisional Government would lead to a more democratic Russia. However in deposing the Provisional Government, the October Revolution had removed any such hope. The totalitarian Government of the Communist Party continued and intensified many aspects of the Tsarist regime including use of the secret police and an intolerance for opposition and democracy in general. The communist regime were just as authoritarian as the Tsars before them. In terms of ideology the fall of Tsarism in 1917 was a significant event as Tsarist belief in total control and centralisation of power was replaced by the Provisional Government, who had introduced liberal reforms and aimed for a democratic Russia. Ideology came to have a far more significant impact under the communists. It was not completely absent under Tsarist rule as the Russification policy of Alexander III shows, however it had virtually no effect in comparison to Stalin's purges. ...read more.


Nicholas II also took this approach in the October Manifesto, the Duma was in theory a step towards democracy but much like Lenin's NEP, was implemented in an authoritarian way to limit the effect on power. The Communists introduced reforms, and concessions where necessary, in order to maintain their authority, such as Lenin's abandonment of war communism for NEP, whereas the Tsars took the same approach by only introducing reform when pressurised as Alexander II's assassination, and his prior implementation of the Emancipation Act shows. The regimes displayed their authoritarian nature in different ways, Lenin saw that war communism was not working and replaced it with NEP, whereas Alexander III put his stamp on Russia by reversing all of his father's reforms. There was also continuity in the nature of Government with the Communists retaining a strong belief in personal authority, Lenin retained all key decisions as the Tsars did before him. Both Communist and Tsarist Governments developed into authoritarian regimes because their authority was largely unchallenged once established. The removal of Khrushchev by the Central Committee and the abdication of Nicholas II in 1917 by comparison were insignificant as neither event managed to have a significant impact on the nature of Russian Government. ...read more.


Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies of the peasantry and Stalin used a similar style of brute force during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. Tsars had also used military force in containing opponents, with Stolypin's necktie under Nicholas II and Alexander II continually employing military force prior to the Emancipation Act. The army was very important to the state, as the 1905 revolution demonstrated, and their continuing use of force against opponents is one way in which they successfully maintain their authoritarian regimes. When the February Revolution brought an end to Tsardom, the newly instated Provisional Government aimed to bring a new age of democracy Russia. However the instatement of the communists in the October Revolution ensured that in the long term, Russia simply exchanged one authoritarian regime for another. Lenin defended his revolution in the Civil War and went on to continue and intensify many aspects of Tsarist autocracy, which Stalin would continue. This ensured that the communist regime was just as authoritarian as the Tsars had been before them, and they were more effective in doing so. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Although some disagree with this view as they understand we could never have predicted the extent to which Stalin employed a 'personal dictatorship'. The democracy strived for during the revolution4 and declined into a dictatorship laced with censorship and nationalism reminiscent of Tsarist autocracy, as only views complementary of the

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    High taxes were commonplace under the Tsars despite the axing of redemption payments in 1905, however in contrast Lenin's NEP ensured that such a heavy burden would not be repeated. Despite this advancement, the most heavy restrictions were seen under Stalin where the relentless use of power, paranoia and hostility led to an unprecedented scale of death and destruction.

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Was there serious opposition to Stalin within the Party? Were the Purges planned? * One explanation is that the events of the Terror largely targeted at the Party and bureaucracy seemed to coincide with changes in policy or with problems with industrialisation.

  2. To What Extent Were the Reforms of Alexander II Intended to Preserve and Strengthen ...

    The number of books published per year doubled between 1855-164. This shows that Alexander did no want to have a stranglehold on the press and his minister in charge of censorship, Valuev, only sought to isolate radical writers. Alexander and Valuev managed to strike a balance between publisher, writer and the censor.

  1. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    By 1938, 2/3 of teachers had attended. Teachers who were not sufficiently committed to National Socialism could be dismissed. Curriculum: Nazis changed the curriculum and great stress was placed on physical exercise which, by 1936, took up at least two hours a day.

  2. Explain why the opponents of the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful ...

    In contrast to the communist regime who were in receipt of total loyalty from the army, mutinies were commonplace in 1917, by which stage over 1 million had deserted, as well as 1905. This had forced Nicholas II's hand in making concessions through the October Manifesto, and later abdicating.

  1. To what extent did the 1917 October revolution completely change the nature and function ...

    Stalin, similar to the tsars before 1917, through propaganda acted as a fatherly figure in Russia who the people of Russia looked up to. Another way in which the October 1917 revolution changed government is in the difference in government structure, an example of this is that

  2. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    The Bolshevik Party had a strict internal hierarchy, and believed that each person should earn the same amount of money, regardless of the job or social position that the person had. This idea seems very closely tied to Communism which it really is.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work