• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"To what extent did the Boer War change attitudes to Empire in Britain?

Extracts from this document...


"To what extent did the Boer War change attitudes to Empire in Britain? The British Empire at its peak was considered the greatest empire in the world. It was the empire on which the sun never set. By 1897 it was guarded by a navy that was equal to the navies of two other powers. One newspaper described Britain as being in 'splendid isolation' in that it had no enemies and needed no friends. The press's view on the events relating to the empire was very important. In 1907 Lord Sanderson, Permanent Undersecretary wrote in his retirement "It has sometimes seemed to me that a foreigner reading our press the British Empire must appear in the light of some huge giant sprawling over the globe with gouty fingers and toes spreading in every direction which cannot be approached without eliciting a scream". Other examples later show how the press portrayed the majority of public thoughts and reflections on certain issues. In the late Seventeenth Century the Dutch East India Company had formed a trading station in South Africa near the Cape of Good Hope. The poorest members of this community were strongly protestant farmers called treboers or Boers. These pilgrims called themselves 'Afrikaners', people of Africa and searched for land. They spoke 'Afrikaans', a modification of Dutch. ...read more.


The term used in the press that summer was that Britain had been victorious over the 'b****y Boers'. Lord Kitchener and Roberts had retuned. In October 1900 the Unionist government staged the 'Khaki elections' and were victorious over the liberals. It was then to become apparent that the celebrations were premature; the Boers had headed for the countryside where they prepared to fight using guerrilla tactics. By 1901 the Boers had invaded Cape Colony. This provoked Lord Kitchener to return to 'put them in their place'. Kitchener's impact on the Boer war from here on can be described as disastrous in the effect it would happen on the British Empire. His tactics were a huge political blunder and caused massive controversy. His 'scorch the earth policy', which basically consisted of the burning of farms, crops and villages was outrageous and evil. He used barbed wire fences to divide the country into zones and collected the civilian population into concentration camps. His treatment of them here was appalling and provoked much anger and debate back in Britain where even the most empire loving Englishmen were aghast with his methods. Once the news of the horrors of the concentration camps got back to England it cause massive debate. Pro-Boer liberal MP's were the first to realise Kitcheners blunder in herding women and children into so-called 'camps of refuge'. ...read more.


The emphasis on 'imperial expansion' and the great benefits on empire had been reduced. Instead emphasis was placed on the potential threat posed by Germany. Britain insecurity in itself was shown when Boy Scout and Girl Guide movements to encourage military standards in children. British defence was critically analysed after the war and considerable changes had been made. There was considerable re-planning on home defence issues as well as foreign protection of the empire. Things like food and ammunition supplies which had failed to operate efficiently during the Boer war were looked at closely. Free school meals and medical examination in schools were set up. This as well as the setting up of the Territorial Army (TA) to defend Britain in an invasion showed British fear in response to the failure of the Boer war. The concessions showed that the British had felt the negative impact of the Boer war and it had shaken them up and forced them to consider seriously thinking about their safety. Britain was a nation that was thought of as a 'policeman' it was a defender of the 'weak'. After the Boer war and especially the concentration camps that had been used Britain had lost its credibility and the power it once had to give moral lectures. Britain was once a good example to the world, after the Boer war it was still an example but of what not to do and how not to treat other nations. Tazeen Rashid F6PNE 1 01/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far was the Boer War, 1899-1902, a turning point in the history of ...

    5 star(s)

    Therefore, the Boer War precipitated a series of changes in attitudes towards the empire. The once idealistic and patriotic attitudes came to be replaced by disillusionment, criticisms and a sense of betrayal. The second turning point concerns the administration of the empire, particularly the self-governing colonies and India.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * During the war the Soviet people suffered terribly, 26,000,000 died altogether. This made Stalin determined that this should never happen again. * He remembered that the Western Allies had intervened in the Civil War in 1918-9 and he suspected that they had encouraged Hitler in the 1930s.

  1. Why And How Did Britain Survive The War From 1940-1943

    This was quite possible as the Russian army was desperately short of good leaders after the Stalin's purges in the years before. The Russian army was technically inferior to the Germans but the soviet army still believed itself to be unbeatable.

  2. Describe the historical claims of Britain and Argentina to the Falkland Islands

    Every person, whether working in the navy, air or infantry force knew what their role was and exactly what they had to do. Even when they were so far away the armed services were still just as efficient and professional as if they were fighting on their own turf.

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    Minorities that had been protected by the crown, such as the Baptists in Massachusetts and the Quakers in Pennsylvania, were now defenseless. The wealthy classes maintained that they were at the mercy of the masses. The new United States was so weak that it was regarded contemptuously all over the world and its diplomats ignored.

  2. In 1915 a British Newspaper printed a letter from a 'Lady Reader' who claimed, ...

    By the end of the battle the British and French had lost 620,000 men and the Germans 450,000. Most casualties were young men in their late teens or early twenties. Many pals battalions, who had signed up together at the beginning of the war were practically wiped out, and villages

  1. Was Canadian participation in the Boer

    They did not want to disturb the Britain-Canada relationships. All in all, Canadian participation in war was undeniably unnecessary. There were already many existing issues between French and English Canadians, but as the war broke out, French and English Canadian relationships got further dreadful.

  2. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    This was evident in the case of the Alabama ship where he accepted the ruling of the international court of Arbitration's ruling for Britain to pay compensation. In September Gladstone published his pamphlet entitled The Bulgarian Horrors, which divided the country and increased the personal hatred between the two men.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work