• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European War in 1914?

Extracts from this document...


To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European War in 1914? The Foreign Policy pursued by Germany in the years proceeding 1914 was decisive in the build up and eventual breakout of war. Although it is far from being the sole cause of the war it was the most influential and significant. It was the stance of Germany Foreign Policy ahead of the Russian actions, the role of Austria-Hungary and the sense that war was inevitable, that was key. The aggressive policy shown by Germany to other nations instigated the tense international relations, which meant that war was inevitable during the July crisis of 1914. Historians such as Fellner have cited Austria-Hungary as the main instigator of the war. The Austria-Hungarian empire was vast and it comprised of many ethnic groups, most of whom in concurrence with the nationalist hegemony in the Balkans were calling for a degree of autonomy. In particular there were in excess of 4 million Serbs within the empire that meant there were calls to incorporate them into Serbia1. Austria-Hungary could not allow this to happen, as it would see other ethnic groups demand the same ad the empire collapse rapidly. When Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand was shot it gave Austria-Hungary the opportunity to take drastic action and declare war on Serbia in order to preserve its self and re-establish the reputation of the monarchy. The Hungarian Prime Minister Tisza summed up this view; "The monarchy must make an energetic decision to show the power of survival and to put an end to intolerable conditions in the southeast". There were also large and extremely influential groups of young pro-war diplomats such as the foreign minister Berchtold and the common finance minister Bilinksi who declared, "the Serb responds only to force, a diplomatic success would make no impression in Bosnia and would be damaging rather than anything else"2. ...read more.


These alliances were however purely defensive at heart, they were designed and signed in order to prevent the outbreak of war. More significantly there were not particularly binding. Russia showed this in 1913 when if failed to support Serbia. In 1914 the majority of the powers that were to become involved preferred peace and in the case of Austria it only wanted a localised war in the Balkans. Germany manipulated its ally and it was the aggression Germany showed therefore that persuaded the other 'great powers' that they had to make a stand. It should be argued that German Foreign Policy that played the instrumental role in the escalation of war had its roots in the 19th century. Otto von Bismarck had unified Germany in 1871 as a result of the Prussian victory over France. The hard core of the new German empire were the Prussians and it was they who provided most of the military leaders. The victories in the 1860's and the knowledge that Germany had the best army in the world meant as the historian I. Geiss described it that the "Prussian military caste was cocksure". It gave them an arrogance and confidence that helped push Germany into war in 1914. Germany had emerged an empire and an increasingly important economic and military power under the helm of the reserved and conservative Bismarck. However he was sacked in 1890 and to quote John R�hl "Imperial Germany under Kaiser Wilhelm II embarked on a long term bid to secure 'world power' status"4. Germany became obsessed with gaining an empire under the sun and the policy of Weltpolitik to achieve this. However by 1909 Germany had been out manoeuvred by Great Britain and isolated and surrounded after the formation of the Triple Entente the members of which were rapidly militarising and matching German power (Russia had implemented the Great Programme in 1912-1914 and France had lengthened military service). ...read more.


However Germany carried on acting in the reckless manner allowing, Austria to issue an ultimatum that Serbia could not accept and therefore they must have known what they were doing and consequently were preparing a European war. 5 Moltke believed that war was Germany's best option. If Germany wanted to achieve its European dominance and an Empire to rival that of Britain it would have to go to war. Men such as Moltke had been preparing for war for years indeed the Schlieffen plan had been formulated in the late 1800's in the event of a war against France and Russia. These Generals placed so much faith in the plan that to quote Rohl they "did not feel impelled to seek a political or diplomatic solution to Germany's grave problems at home and abroad". Moltke himself had been unhappy with the peaceful outcome of the Moroccan Crisis in 1911, such was his desire and drive towards war. 6 In 1911 there was increased tension after the Agadir Crisis when the French had occupied Fez and consequently broken an agreement with Germany. It allowed Germany a pretext to send a gunboat to Agadir. Although the French in effect conceded it persuaded Britain to aid its support behind the French, leaving the Germans isolated other then Austria in Europe. This in turn served to encourage the German Generals that war was the only option. 7 The historian Berghahn put together a thesis blaming German "internal pressures" for pushing Germany into a war. Berghahn blames several factors within Germany. Firstly there was the crisis between the Prusso-German political systems whereby the political system had been based upon the rigid Prussian elite and this was being threatened by increased industrialisation. Secondly there was Tirpitz and his Navy. The cost of creating the large navy was reflected in the taxes and this caused social unrest. Thirdly the paralysis of the Monarchy at home, which involved inflated resentment towards the ruling elite who were ruling increasingly by decree and not through the Reichstag. 03/03/02 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was the alliance system responsible for the outbreak of World War ...

    5 star(s)

    This was before the Carte Blanche 1914). Many of Austria-Hungary's aggressive policies stemmed from the belief in German support. Both wanted empirical status; Germany to gain an empire, Austria-Hungary to preserve one. Their alliances allowed policies that were openly aggressive to take place, helping to spark tension and aggression.

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    The Marshall Plan itself was an example of the "security dilemma" that both the USA and the USSR faced. In the West, the Plan was perceived as an attempt to uphold political freedom while in the East it was seen as an aggressive policy.

  1. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    The fact that so many people supported Hitler's anti-Semitic polices meant that it was easy for n**i-party activists to carry out the will of the Furher, without any protest. The opposing view put forth by German scholar Marliss Steinart has been that only very few people 'new about the monstrous

  2. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    We have to consider that this was only forthcoming in 1912 and the French did not have any specific indication as to where the British would take the field right up to 1914.Ths relates to the Kaiser himself as although he had many ambitions, he had many concerns about encirclement,

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The two guarantors were Britain and Prussia. Both agreed to come to Belgium's aid if her neutrality was broken by another country. * In August 1914, Germany asked to be allowed to send its armies through Belgium in order to put the Schlieffen Plan into operation. * The Belgian Government refused and, when the Germans invaded, called

  2. World War I: Could it have been avoided?

    The system of alliances was a major cause of the First World War because it brought the major countries of Europe against each other. Nationalism in Europe was another major cause of the First World War because it had different affects on the people and government of Germany and Austria.

  1. Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the ...

    from the previous election, it was still a long way off from a definitive majority. This can be attributed to the street violence of the SA, which had turned off many voters. However by the end of 1933 (after the Enabling Act was passed and all other political parties banned)

  2. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    States through understanding, informing, and influencing foreign publics and broadening dialogue between American citizens and institutions and their counterparts abroad13." The website also provides for the differences between traditional diplomacy and public diplomacy. The USIAAA states that: "Public diplomacy differs from traditional diplomacy in that public diplomacy deals not with governments but primarily with non-governmental individuals and organizations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work