• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the increase in electoral support for the Nazis in the years 1928-1933 the result of propaganda and electioneering?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the increase in electoral support for the n**i's in the years 1928-1933 the result of propaganda and electioneering? This period of time saw the Nazis spiral into power through the collapse of the global economy and the turn to extremism. The crisis had shrouded over Germany and had left the country vulnerable with an undesirable deficit and an indecisive Weimar coalition government to find a solution. Constitution of Germany also contributed to the surge of support for the Nazis; Article 48 left the Weimar Republic subject to the President's authority. Combined with the heavy distribution of precision contrived electioneering and propaganda, the Nazis formulated a recipe for seizing power. Beneath the efficient Nazis and their strength as a catch-all party, there lay a severe problem with the country's governing body: the Weimar Republic. Firstly, in the coalition's infancy in1930, President Hindenburg had immediately cut their authority through the exercising of Article 48 rule by decree. By law this allowed the President to exert ultimate authority and could amend and make statute law. For the Nazis this was the basis of their uprising; dissolving the strength of the existing government meant increased dissatisfaction with the public who, during austere times, needed decisive leadership. ...read more.


How this benefitted the Nazis however was different; in extreme times, extreme measures are called for usually by the public. Because the economy in Germany from 1929-1932 was disastrous, the political parties with the promise for most significant change were favoured; giving the Nazis a chance to catch support. Discontent amongst the population as their currency became almost worthless, leant itself to radicalism and the Nazis; their rise in support was synonymous with the economic downturn. Had the financial crisis improved over the years or had the coalition government been more successful, then the Nazis would have struggled to have come to power because the public only looked to them in the most desperate of times. To say that it was the Great Depression singularly which resulted in their increased electoral support is arguable; a more resounding judgment is that the inefficient Weimar government was to blame. The economic climate may, not alone, have been enough for the mass population to turn to a far right-wing party, but with the culmination of the government it provided the ingredients for a surge in support for the n**i party. The internal structure and organisation of the n**i party also had a telling effect on the attraction of voters, despite the external conditions. ...read more.


Secondly what also aided their success were the subjects of their propaganda. Knowing their ideology suited strata of society, Nazis targeted farmers, families, workers, women and many more groups with knowledge that they could promote policies for that area and attract their vote. Good examples of this were the posters aimed at farmers talking of rural support, and the cartoon of family, idealising them and outlining the benefits of a prosperous family. Both electioneering and propaganda undoubtedly helped the n**i cause. Hitler himself was a successful tool in which people were attracted, as well as the volume of propaganda it was unsurprising that they eventually achieved power. Propaganda and electioneering certainly were successful in the n**i rise in support during 1928-1933, but had it not been for the existing problems then they would not have been so effective. The global economy lead to severe discontent around Germany and left the nation in ruins; the government in office was not of high enough calibre to satisfy their needs and a solution was sought after. n**i support ultimately sprouted from the weakness of the coalition; a stronger government could have rode roughshod and kept power, yet through the worsening of the crisis and the powerful weapon of propaganda, Hitler and the Nazis were able to gain control of Germany; one of the most infamous regimes in history. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    the world into believing that the fiihrer had confided his innermost thoughts over many years to his secret diaries. The Hitler diary affair disclosed some ugly truths about Germans, neo-Nazis, and a world obsessed by sordid scandals and revolting people."

  2. How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933?

    of any party to yield to the suggestions of any other party. As a result, the Reichstag often failed to come to a consensus on the passing of laws, which on more than several occasions prompted President Ebert to use Presidential Decree to pass laws without any approval from the

  1. Why did Hindenburg appoint Hitler as Chancellor in 1933?

    As the war continued high food prices and shortages led to a change of heart - people began to question the war and how effective the German army was, however the people believed they still had the best chance of winning.

  2. To what extent did Hitlers Policies attract working class support between 1933 and 1939?

    This showed security and stability could overcome reservations over the regime. While support fluctuated across different industries the enduring trend was insistence upon the centrality of economics. Kershaw argued discontent "rooted in socio-economic experience ... [was] remarkable"9, highlighting wage increases as priority.

  1. To vote for Hitler was above all a rejection of the existing system. Is ...

    It included socialism, nationalism, and the working classes; it focused the parties aim on the good of the German people, something that many Germans felt they had lost since the terms of the Treaty of Versailles were forced upon them.

  2. Describe the Nazi's stance on Homosexuality

    'C:PRNTWNPR�C#FRAMFRAM�G�TITLTITLwHDOP DOP �H.The n**i Party and Homosexuals The n**i campaign against homosexuality targeted the more than one million German men who, the state asserted, carried a "degeneracy" that threatened the "disciplined masculinity" of Germany. Denounced as "antisocial parasites" and as "enemies of the state," more than 100,000 men were arrested under a broadly interpreted law against homosexuality.

  1. To what extent did the increase in the persecution of witches in Europe from ...

    accounted for such a small minority of the general population, could mean that the ?woman hunt? has actually been slightly overstated and the witch hunts were not as genderised and misogynistic as originally thought. ?Statistical evidence makes clear the over 99.9 per cent of all women who lived during the

  2. To what extent did Nazi support increase during the years 1923-33?

    This is shown in the national vote in 1924; the n**i?s claimed 7% of the vote compared to the massive 10% they had in their first election. This now put the n**i party on level with other parties like the DDP and the DVP.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work