• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the nuclear arms race a more stabilising factor in the cold war from 1949 to 1963?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the nuclear arms race a more stabilising factor in the cold war from 1949 to 1963? From the period of 1949 up until 1963 saw increasing developments in nuclear technology by both the two superpowers, the USA and USSR. The 'race 'meant that both superpowers aimed to match each other and even gain the upper hand in terms of nuclear missile technology. Nuclear arms were seen as a form of scare tactic against the other superpower as both felt threatened by each other's ideological capability. It was also used as a form of defence mechanism in case of future attack however, the power and destruction of the weapons in which these countries created would have proved fatal not only for the opposing country but for the world. The nuclear arms race has been argued that it stabilised relations between the countries especially after the Cuban missile crisis although there is much evidence that proves otherwise, in which relations between the soviets and the United States were as tense as ever. ...read more.


This policy however was used by both parties which in essence mad the whole of the period of time a very tense time. The false threats could be seen as a stabilising factor as both parties were not going to use the weapons, only as a scare tactic which would lead to an increase in communication between the countries. On the other side, threatening to destroy the opposing superpower could be seen as unsettling the relations even more than it already was. M.A.D. (Mutually Assured Destruction) could also be a Stabilising factor in this period as it caused both sides to rethink their strategies. Both sides had enough nuclear weaponry to annihilate the other and to even counter-strike when hit first. Both sides knew that using this strategy would prove too costly so for their own need they needed another approach. A more flexible approach in which the sides would use smaller, targeted missiles achieving to hit a specific area would be more worthwhile as it would limit the amount of action and devastation that the arms could bring. ...read more.


They were literally hours from nuclear war. However there other factor that played into the formation of the treaty. The Soviet Union were in economic turmoil especially when they were paying almost a third of their GMP on arms. America was also in turmoil especially with the Vietnam War heating up and domestic issue of civil rights. In conclusion, after looking at the period of 1949-1963, the nuclear arms race was a stabilising factor in the cold war although things could have been the complete opposite. The risk of using Brinksmanship could have ended in war and eventual devastation of the world. Both countries, for their own sake needed to come to some agreement to limit the arms. By using the 'hot line' telephone link both superpowers could prevent each other with great speed which helped misunderstanding especially when Khrushchev had a very unpredictable mind. The test ban treaty of 63' also helped limit the use of unsettling use of the weapons but it dragged other powerful nations such as China and France into the mix when they disagreed against the treaty. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent did the nuclear arms race make the world a more dangerous ...

    3 star(s)

    Followed by an even more destructive weapon; the lithium b**b exploded by the soviets in 1953. Under Eisenhower and Dulles who understood clearly the dangers of a nuclear war and were hard-line communists, both together were more than willing to go the brink of war.

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis

    While it is clear that there may have been something in the concerns about invasion, the writings of Khrushchev himself show that the strategy was also invented as a means of "equalizing what the West likes to call balance of power."13 The double-edged nature of this Soviet probe became even

  1. Nuclear Arms Race - A cold war investigation.

    to retaliate against a surprise first strike attack), so that if either the United States or U.S.S.R launched an attack on the other, then they would be able to retaliate so that both nations would be destroyed. This was defined as the M.A.D concept which stood for Mutually Assured Destruction.

  2. To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

    Also a modern revisionist historian, Brian Moynahan, states that "Their [Czech Legion] success was a death sentence for Nicholas and his family. The party did not want to give the Whites any live banner to rally round"2 This conveys that the purpose of the execution of the Tsar and his

  1. "After 1949, the superpowers saw a need to extend their influence beyond Europe." How ...

    Pacific Fleet to blockade the Straits of Taiwan and the matter was over4. In Japan, Japanese Communist Party challenged American military presence and even the majority of non-communist Japanese backed the violent demonstrations staged by the Communist Party. The loss of the Tokyo military base would have the Americans lose a strategic airfield closest to Eastern Soviet Union.

  2. History of the United States

    brought the United States closer to a free-trade basis. Growing Sectional Conflicts President Polk's war with Mexico ripped open the slavery question again. Was it to be allowed in the new territories? The WILMOT PROVISO (1846), which would have excluded slavery, became a rallying point for both sides, being voted on again and again in Congress and successfully held off by southerners.

  1. Critically analyse the Vietnam War in 1963

    They decided to hold elections to finalize the government in Vietnam in two years to reunite the country. In the meantime Ho and his followers along with the Soviets and China had a stronghold in the North and former Emperor Bai Dai in the South.

  2. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    * Election of Eisenhower and death of Stalin enabled an armistice to be concluded in 1953 to end the Korean War. * New Soviet leadership put pressure on North Korea?s Kim Il Sung to agree to a ceasefire. There had been stalemate since ?51 * January 1954 ? Berlin Foreign Ministers conference.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work