• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent would you agree with the statement that Lenin betrayed the revolution?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent would you agree with the statement that Lenin betrayed the revolution? There are very many opinions about whether Lenin did betray the Bolshevik revolution in October 1917. To begin with though it is very important to establish how significant and supported the role of Lenin was to the revolution, and to Russia after the revolution, to be able to evaluate whether Lenin was capable of betraying the revolution. There are two main views of Lenin's role and position in the party. Firstly, there is the view of Lenin as a god-like figure. This view depicts Lenin as the symbol of the revolution and the main driving force behind the achievement of Bolshevik power. Leon Trotsky's biography of Lenin illustrates his view of the importance of Lenin in the revolution describing Lenin as 'The greatest engine-driver of Revolution'. This view also demonstrated Lenin as having the control of the Party and therefore the control of the State. ...read more.


Many Russian historian discarded Communism and Lenin completely saying that it wasn't either justified or inevitable. Therefore in conclusion, I believe that Lenin must have had a significant role in the revolution and to Russia after the revolution. I believe this must have been the case because of the tremendous support from the public and key figures in the Bolshevik Party such as Trotsky. Also because even when there was freedom to be critical about Lenin there was no evidence to support that Lenin was the main person behind the revolution and the party in general. Therefore now we can confirm that Lenin did have a very significant role in the revolution and Bolshevik Russia, it is possible to evaluate if Lenin was a betrayer or a great revolutionist. There are very many views about whether Lenin did betray the revolution. The biggest factor for promoting Lenin not betraying the revolution is the factor that it would take time for the Bolsheviks to set up Russia to be ready to become Communist and to therefore hand over the country to the Proletariat. ...read more.


A big factor that made Lenin look like he betrayed the revolution is the New Economic Policy because it went against Marxists views by bringing in capitalist policies like small private industry and private trade. Therefore it can be seen that Lenin was not working in the interests of the proletariat and therefore betrayed them. However, some Bolsheviks would argue that it was brought in as a short-term policy to help the proletariat in the long run. A big factor that makes Lenin look like he betrayed the revolution is the fact that there was very little involvement from the industrial workforce. The majority of the party was run by the upper classes and not the industrial workforce, which Lenin and Marx believed the basis of the revolution should be around and therefore without them Lenin was betraying the revolution. However, Lenin believed that a group of intellectuals dedicated to furthering the interests of the workers could seize power in the interests of the proletariat, but there still should have been some involvement by proletariat. Robert Catherall 12PE November 2002 Miss Clay History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    June to this right "...shattered [the politically conscious minority of workers] faith in the moderate socialists, for it was seen as tantamount to sabotaging the gains of February". This according to Stephen Smith, who also argues that this dispute did more than anything else to radicalize the politically conscious minority and cast them into the arms of the Bolsheviks.

  2. Russian Revolution Sources Questions

    Trotsky never made an effort like Stalin to get people on his side, he was far too arrogant and rude to the other party members. Where as Stalin used his position and friends to eventually guarantee the expulsion of Trotsky.

  1. To what extent can Lenin be considered the begetter of Stalinism? Frank Carson - ...

    practiced in the early 20s, in which every member of the party was made to justify himself before a purge commission and defend against criticisms delivered openly from the floor or in secret, by denunciation. Parallels can be drawn between Stalin's use of the secret police against Trotskyists and similar

  2. The significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923).

    For this reason the working class were happy to self-sacrifice in order for the Bolsheviks to be built up and the overthrow the government. This was important as it gave the Bolshevik party mass support, a class to aim at but also use, for fighting if neccesary, to get what they wanted.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    Lenin introduced a new tactic of targeting the peasants. He realised their importance for support and so offered them land to get them onside. Lenin's April Thesis was offering the Russians what their Provisional Government would not and so gaining publicity and some supporters, which is why it was Lenin's vital contribution.

  2. How important was Lenin in bringing about the Bolshevik revolution of November 1917?

    His party's reaction suggests they did not have complete faith in him as a leader. However, Potresov, one of Lenin's contemporaries states differently when describing Lenin. " A man of iron will and indomitable energy, capable of instilling fanatical faith in the movement and the cause, and possessed of equal faith in himself."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work