• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Unification of Germany and the period up to the second world war

Extracts from this document...


Unification of Germany and the period up to the second world war I. Background * 1815 to 1848 German confederation of states and the zollverein it was basically a gp of states under the leadership of Austria, and Austria wanted to stamp out nationalism, and against democracy and revolution, lose entity with assembly who had no powers, they had no fed army, but one good thing they did was set up the zollverein from 1832 to 1834 and this made Prussia take the lead in front of Austria and this had three major effects ; power to Prussia and economic prosperity and nationalist feelings II. 1848 to 1850 first unification attempts * great thinkers began to think it was better to unite and therefore started to do this in 1848 and unite Germany with all the rest to make one big state and therefore they did the Frankfurt assembly but people soon lost faith as they did not represent the people well enough all they wanted was power and then the Prussian king was asked to come to power and he said no and therefore Fred William IV tried to unite powers from above after the assembly was dissolved and nothing came of it and Austria asserted her power at olmutz III. Austro Prussian rivalry * Prussia got more and more money, Crimean war and Italian defeat there, Von moltke and Von roon played great part, Prussia explored coal and steel, Prussian and Austrian German nationalism was very present IV. Unification process * Preparation phase with the Prussian constitutional crisis, 1860 to 1862 and therefore they got Bismarck since assembly did not want to agree with the military budget and he had good education and he was conservative but changed ideals after he realized that Prussia was much stronger V. Road to success * Schleswig hollstein issue where H wanted to break away but the Danish king did not want too and therefore he started asserting more power on them and Prussia was ...read more.


in 1934 after the death of Von Hinderburg 2. he was appointed in the 30th Jan 1933 to a cabinet which only contained 2 other nazis and a majority of nationalists and Hitler immediately wanted to secure power for himself and the n**i party and an end to its dependence on other parties, Hitler precipitated the Reichstag elections and the election campaign was used to extend n**i power and influence by setting up of the SA and the SS 3. the Reichstag building was then burnt down and Hitler accused the communists, and therefore hindenburg allowed for a law which called for the suppression of many civil liberties and many communists were therefore arrested and purged and many knew it was had been Hitler who was responsible and just used it as an excuse to kill communists 4. n**i got larger percentage in voting now and the communist party was banned but the most vital bill was the enabling bill which gave Hitler full and total powers on the 23rd March 1933 and this would give him all power for a year where he could make laws without asking the Reichstag and could also make alliances with other treaties and go against the constitution, SA and SS put pressure on people and the bill was enacted and therefore Hitler turned on his enemies 5. catholic parties were declared illegal SPD was also dissolved some time after trade unions banned, nazis became the only legal party in 1933 and up to august 1934 this was considered period of co-ordination where nazis infiltrated everything 6. serious opposition was the SA and right wing nationalists since they had hoped to get power through Hitler which they did not, Hitler used right wing support to gain respectability here and abroad with also his concordat with the Vatican, and the Germany withdrawal from the LN which both won support of traditional Germans and opposers of weimar rep but support for Hitler was short-lived, and therefore a lot of them ...read more.


he then entered rhineland and this could have been stopped as he had an illusion of strength but in fact was not that strong at all he was anyway more ready for short war than long one but also he withdrew from the league of nations and the disarmament conference, and did non aggression pact with Poland in 1934 for ten years, then he went into France's security zone and then also had serious talks with Mussolini 3. conscription then naval treaty with Britain so she was calmed down, and France was p****d since England saying OK to going against treaty, he got back the SAAR as has been promised to him and so his unification had begun then also went into rhineland again which went against Versailles and locarno, then went to get alliances, got Rome Berlin axis and allowed to recognise Austrian independence as long as she was friendly to Germany to follow there was Austrian anchluss, he also recognised franco's regime, anti comintern pact with Japan 4. lord Halifax was sent to calm his down and French went to eastern Europe to try to strengthen alliances there 5. after 1937 Hitler achieved all three first aims anchluss with Austria and had gone all against Versailles treaty too, won Czech too after Munich conference, he then took back his agreements with Poland and UK saying it was trying to circle Germany, non aggression with Denmark Latvia and Estonia, and then strengthened alliance with Italy too and in 1939 non aggression pact with Russia too, even though totally against his thing against communism in the beg but that was OK since he needed it self interest was more important at this point, however he miscalculated with Poland since he thought they would let him have it there is debate whether all this was planned or not and seems to think that really he did not he was just great opportunist and he knew extra living space would be the hardest thing to do ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    He would not have left Russia to go to the war front and the problems would have been controlled. The Tsar would have stayed in power and, therefore, there would not have been a revolution to get the Bolsheviks power, as the Tsar would still rule and still have some support.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was it the policies pursued by Henry VIII that caused "the mid-Tudor crisis"?

    4 star(s)

    If he had been successful, for the people of England, the costs would have been far outweighed by the glory and prestige. Therefore, although it can be argued that this policy of Henry's did partly cause a crisis, it must also be borne in mind that war at this time was a matter of national pride.

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    A war also occurred with France in 1870, but it is the war itself with Austria in 1866, previously promised by Bismarck, which changed the course of German history forever. Talk had been considered of a united Germany, but little came of it, as discussion could not decide whether Austria

  2. Vietnam war

    From the beginning the Cambodian communists were marginalized, during the Geneva Conference of 1954 they were essentially sacrificed by the other communist nations. During 1967 Pol Pot went to Hanoi to seek approval and aid for a planned uprising, but the Vietnamese had an arrangement with Sihanouk and refused to help.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    For the same reason Hitler put an end to regular cabinet meetings and insisted on dealing with ministers singly, so that they could not combine against him. 'I have an old principle,' he told Ludecke: 'only to say what must be said to him who must know it, and only when he must know it.'

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    This is the basis of the Intentionalist argument. According to Hossbach another of Hitler?s aims was revenge on France. This was a country that seemed h**l bent on keeping Germany down. France had invaded Germany in 1923 and many Germans wanted revenge for this as well as the loss of the First World War.

  1. Was Germany a meaningful concept by 1815?

    Also, by letting Prussia retain their rule, they had motivation to recover their position before Napoleon attacked them. The army was re-organised, the government provided more efficient central authority and a new system of education was introduced. This allowed Prussia to maintain their power and still have some control over the states.

  2. To what extent was Wilhelmine Germany an entrenched authoritarian state?

    In duality, the constitutional powers of the Kaiser came to be inundated with the less constrained powers of the King of Prussia (who exercised absolute, extra-constitutional control over the army, and had unrestricted right to appoint, promote, and dismiss all officers and officials).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work