• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the obstacles to German Unification immediatly before the 1848 Revolutions

Extracts from this document...


What were the obstacles to the Unification of Germany by the beginning of 1848? Germany in 1848 was an almost unrecognisable place compared with Germany of today and even by the Germany of 1890, the main reason for this is not geographical, because its borders are not that different from 1848, or economically but political, Germany was not a Federal Republic but a group of 39 separate autocratic states ruled by Princes, Kings and even other countries unwilling to lose power and so unification was not even considered as an option at this time. It was not just rulers of the states that opposed German unification, there were a great many other obstacles, which I will discuss, therefore the forces against Unification greatly outweighed the forces of nationalism driving it. So you cannot simply describe Germany as a nation but more of a group of countries grouped by language and geography. Also the political sway of Austria and Prussia prevented even the publication of statements calling for unification, many modern historians consider the Vorm�rz period as a time when nationalism and liberalism in Germany were suppressed by the German rulers, most notably Austria. With the suppression of Nationalism and Liberalism, the cause for a united Germany could never be expressed publicly and gain support, exactly as people like Prince Metternich wanted. Germany in the period prior to Vorm�rz had been decimated by the forces of post revolutionary France, only a coalition of Britain, Prussia and Russia could defeat arguably one of the greatest historical figures of all time. Due to this life in Germany changed dramatically, the people of southern Germany for example were united under the Confederation of the Rhine, the French legal and social system were completely different to the feudal laws imposed by previous overloads also Austria and Prussia lost power when Napoleon was Emperor of France, they did not want to lose that power again so they repressed calls for unification by people who had been ruled by France and saw the power of a united state. ...read more.


The majority of German speaking people were uneducated peasants who cared about their village, their crop and their overload and not really considering the internal politics of the German Confederation, it would be naive to conclude that peasants did not understand the political climate of the time, but they would care to preserve their village, family and cultural identity. On a grand scale the majority of Germans wished to preserve the status quo at this time, this benefited Austria and Prussia because their power was not threatened as long as the status quo was preserved. Particularism was an obstacle to German unification because if Germany was unified many regional identities would be replaced with a national identity, this is not what the majority of people wanted because many peasants were bound by traditional and not educated in the benefits of a unified society. Furthermore, Germany was only critically linked by the German language, and only similar in terms of culture and social policies, so it would be difficult to unite a nation based on a single common bond. Up until the Congress of Vienna in 1815 there were over 300 German states each with their own princes or rulers, autocrats, now in the Vorm�rz period (1815-48) there were now 39. The number of autocrats were getting smaller and with revolutions in France and other places, autocracy was becoming more difficult to maintain. The rulers of the 39 states were reluctant to lose any power what so ever, the quote " the only threat to those in power, is losing it" this epitomised these princes position in 1848. They had seen increased liberal and national movements and it worried them because these forces had already overthrown a powerful monarchy, France, and now it threatened them. There are many examples to prove this assumption. Firstly, the Habsburgs rule a large area of Europe almost completely autocratically and they did not want to lose any power to the middle classes, Metternich's actions demonstrated this because he represented ...read more.


War is the changing force, but in 1848 there was no changing force, no driving force for either to unite no common enemy except unification, no similarities except language. In my opinion this is the main reason why unification did not occur in the Vorm�rz period, because if they had united then many other German States would follow their lead and join them, but because they were so powerful it was never going to happen. To conclude, the obstacles to German unification at the beginning of 1848 were Metternich's thoughts, actions and views as one of the most powerful men in Germany he could have encouraged unification but he resisted it wholeheartedly therefore he was an obstacle. Also regional Particularism was another reason why German could not unite in 1848, most German were loyal to their individual states rather than the idea of a German nation also they were very proud of their regions and would not easily give up their identities and regional differences prevented unification because many regions were completely different from others. The ruling classes of Germany prevented unification because neither the aristocracy or the rulers were willing to lose power and hand it to another king they did not appoint. The Carlsbad Decrees and the Congress of Troppau were obstacles because they silenced nationalist an liberalist movements in public therefore preventing them to gain enough support for a German unification. The Confederation prevented German Unification because it secured Austria's position and did not promote unification, but the main obstacle to German unification was the rivalry between Austria and Prussia, neither would yield to the other and neither wished to unite because they could lose power. If you asked an ordinary German in 1848 he would say that he could not see a unified Germany in the near future because of the obstacles but unknown to him it was closer than he thought just 30 years off, so with all these obstacles what changed in 30 years? ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    The main reason why the German revolutions of 1848 failed was because they failed ...

    3 star(s)

    The failure to support and organise the working class to their benefit resulted in the failure of the revolutions as a whole. The Frankfurt parliament was not experienced enough to handle a revolution as they wasted time on discussions instead of taking action.

  2. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    Gulick argues 'their (Statesmen's) minds did not lift anything above the orthodox. There was no stunning act of leadership and no lasting or creative advance towards the future.'22 Only in some general agreements on the abolition of slavery and the navigation or rivers, which made little difference in practice, was there any attempt to reform.

  1. In the articles by Thomas Paine and Klemens von Metternich I was able to ...

    Thomas Paine writes about how everyone is created equal. Men and women are the distinctions of nature, the good and bad of heaven. He sounds disgusted when he thinks about how a race of men came into the world better than the rest.

  2. Obstacles to German Unification

    She intended to have a step on German affairs hoping to make a balance in central Europe. Any unification movement would hinder her French influence development in Germany. She strongly oppose to those attempts to unify Germany which will affect herself.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The condition of the country at the close of hostilities in May 1945 can be described by one word, chaos-chaos in its most literal and classical sense. Unlike World War I, which ended with German armies everywhere on enemy soil and which left German territory unscathed, World War II bequeathed

  2. Why did the early revolutions fail to unite Italy?

    In the revolutions of Modena and Parma, the uprisings were lead by a university professors? son, named Edward Misely. He showed his plans to Duke Francis IV and was betrayed and arrested. The rebels still took over the city of Modena without a leader and set up a provisional government.

  1. Was Germany a meaningful concept by 1815?

    He also created the Austria/Prussia rivalry which allowed Prussia to take control over the steps towards unification as Austria did not want to take part in it. Also, as these were the two main states in the Holy Roman Empire, it greatly weakened its structure and therefore allowed room for the idea of a unified Germany.

  2. Bismarck and the Unification of the German States

    Nationalism was the belief that people of a common language and culture should be joined as one country, and Liberalism believed in a representative government. Bismarck, Prussian President at the time, favoured Nationalism, however he vehemently opposed Liberalism. Bismarck?s political preferences are significant to German unification as they played important

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work