• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Parliament win the first civil war?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Parliament Win the First Civil War? The First Civil War lasted several years and it was not clear who was to win. In the end however, Parliament did succeed, and the King failed. How this was done, through allies, generals and money is what is going to be explained. The generals were a major factor as they were the ones who led the armies, inspired them to fight well and bravely and had to work out the tactics that were to be used. Oliver Cromwell became the most important general on the Parliamentarian side and Prince Rupert of the Rhine (1618 - 1692) on the Royalist side. Oliver Cromwell was famous for his well thought out tactics and his well disciplined army, where as Rupert, the kings nephew, made decisions without thinking them through and was not always in full control of his men. ...read more.


Sir Thomas Fairfax (1612 - 1671) was appointed Lord-General and Philip Skippon as Major General. The army was made up of 11 regiments of horse, 12 regiments of foot and 1,000 dragoons, mounted men armed with carbines, in all 22,000 men. It turned their army into an 'efficient fighting force with a Puritan religious zeal.' The officers were trained and the soldiers were drilled. The army was well equipped, well fed and paid. Less than half of it was from the existing army and the rest were from London and the eastern countries. Although the King joked about this new army, he was defeated by it in Naseby in the last major battle of the war. To be in control of London, as Parliament was, was a powerful thing. Parliament had control over London, the customs and the key ports, which meant money. ...read more.


By the time the Scots decided to change sides, the New Model Army was fighting well. Wars cost money. Charles had many very wealthy supporters and could have funded a short war very easily. But there was no quick victory for him and his supporters so money was becoming a concern. As well as having the advantage of controlling London, the Parliamentarians were also much more efficient that the Royalists at collecting taxes from the areas they controlled. The King could not afford to raise another army after many of his men were killed at Naseby in 1645 It was not only that Parliament won the First Civil war, but that the Royalists lost. It was not that Parliament had more support than the king, because they didn't and it was not that Parliament had always been stronger because they hadn't. The king didn't take his chance early on, and the Parliamentarian side grew stronger and had good leaders, along with the fact that they had the advantage of support and control over London. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did Parliament win the English Civil War?

    Parliament also constructed the army of the Eastern Association. This was significant not only for the extra troops it gave Parliament, but it also represented the emergence of Sir Thomas Fairfax and Oliver Cromwell. These two new armies were augmentative to the Parliamentarian war-effort and undermined the Royalist's endeavours.

  2. Why did Parliament win the First Civil War?

    members in Parliament, in the Peace Party that wanted negotiation with Charles but Pym was completely against this idea so convinced them to agree to fight the King. John Pym's most important contribution to Parliament's war effort was his negotiations with the Scots to send an army to fight for Parliament in the Solemn League and Covenant.

  1. Why did parliament win the civil war?

    In February 1645 Parliament passed the New Model Ordinance, bringing the Armies of the Earl of Essex and Manchester and Sir William Waller into a national army under professional officers; this emerged from the unimpressive performance of Parliament's forces after their success at the Battle of Marston Moor in 1644.

  2. Why Did Parliament Win The Civil War?

    There was a sudden appearance of allies on the scene and this was a great advantage for the Parliamentarians in securing the North. The radical reform such as the Self Denying Ordinance 1645 proved advantageous to the Parliamentary cause. It was clear that Essex and Manchester were at best half-hearted in pursuing the fight against the Royalists.

  1. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    So Pym had the right idea about getting local support, and this is proof of his tactical genius. At the same time, while Charles failed to maintain control over his followers, Pym worked to secure the co-operation of the war and peace groups in Parliament.

  2. Why did Parliament win the Civil War?

    The Battle of Edge hill had left the road to London clear for the Royalists. However, their defeat at the hands of the 'London trained Bands' prevented the Royalists taking London, which would have almost guaranteed a victory for the King.

  1. An unmitigated disaster. How valid is this assessment of Oliver Cromwells experiment with the ...

    (Godfrey Davies, The Early Stuarts, 1603-1660, 1952) Christopher Hill later claimed that as a result of their reactions subsequent generations of English people developed a negative conception of liberty within which 'freedom means being left alone'.

  2. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    They say the Levellers ideas were far too radical and would have therefore caused chaos. Cromwell's views were slightly different - he believed that letting the levellers have their way would have undermined his authority and position. Cromwell also thought that equality for everyone would make criminals and wrongdoers demand too much from the country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work