"Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as Lenin's successor?"

Authors Avatar

“Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as Lenin’s successor?”

The triumph of Communism in Russia was arguably down to one man – Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin). The takeover started in April1917 when Lenin released the ‘April Theses’ asking for the provisional government to step down. It was 6 months later though that any real progress came about as Lenin and the Bolsheviks formatted a new Soviet Government.  

        It did not go as smoothly as the Bolsheviks had planned though because as soon as they had set up a government – they had a civil war to deal with. This war heavily influenced their policies as they had to contend with fighting the Whites who were heavily against a Communist Russia. The party was hardened and militarized but this was through no choice of their own. Russia at this time saw the Bolsheviks instigate extreme economic policies such as War Communism and implacable hostility developed towards the West. The Civil war was not completely responsible for these effects but it is obvious that without the civil war – Communist Russia could have been a far different place.  

        It was Lenin and his policies that helped the Bolsheviks consolidate power and for doing this, he was seen as an almost omnipotent figure by the Russian people.

Join now!

        This was not the case for every Russian person however. On August 30th 1918 – Lenin survived an assassination attempt but he was wounded badly. A number of strokes paralyzed him and prevented him from running his day to day duties. He died on January 21st 1924 from his fourth stroke.

        Communist Russia had lost their leader. They had lost a man who had tried so hard to initiate Communism despite having huge problems with war and finance. The fact that he changed from War Communism to NEP showed that he represented the workers and that he wanted to help them ...

This is a preview of the whole essay