Why did the reforms introduced by Nicholas II after the 1905 Revolutions not prevent a revolution in Russia in February 1917?

Authors Avatar

Why did the reforms introduced by Nicholas II after the 1905 Revolutions not prevent a revolution in Russia in February 1917?

        After the 1905 Revolution, even though Tsar Nicholas II introduced the October Manifesto on the advice of Sergei Witte, he did so half-heartedly and without sincerity.  

        In the manifesto, he pledged civil liberties such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom to form political parties. He also promised a duma with universal male suffrage.

        What followed, however, was a reversal of attitude. The secret police remained at large, freedom of speech was still heavily regulated and the duma had a very limited franchise (the socialists did not even participate). Further, Nicholas II introduced the Fundamental Laws which confirmed his autocratic powers and put him above the Dumas. All laws that the Dumas wished to pass had to go through the Tsar and thus the power of the Dumas was severely limited as well.

Join now!

        The Dumas became just a hollow shell as the Tsar exercised his power of veto excessively and dissolved Dumas at will. The Dumas were a farce with no real political power which angered the liberal and reformist parties in particular.

        Reforming ministers such as Sergei Witte were distrusted by the Tsar with Nicholas II reported to have said, “Curse the Dumas, it is all Witte’s doing”, although these were the very concessions that had helped him survive the 1905 Revolution. Stolypin may have seemed reforming but he was hugely in favor of the Tsarist system. Such were his repressive policies ...

This is a preview of the whole essay