• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the South lose the American Civil War?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the South lose the American Civil War? The Civil War, which began in 1861, came to an end on 13th May 1865 with a victory for the North. This however had not always been the case, as the South were victorious in many of the earlier battles of the war such as First Manassas and they appeared at first to have strong military leadership. Whilst it has been argued that the South's defeat was due to poor strategy within the military and the appointment of weak generals, many people also believe that there are other reasons for the South not winning the war. These include political leadership, foreign support, the supply of the army and war economics. Firstly, geography was in fact more advantageous for the South as they had a larger land mass than the North, with mountains and rivers which made battle easier for the people who knew the area, and harder for people who did not. The South also had a huge coastline, which made a blockade hard to enforce. However, the North was far more industrialised and wealthier than the South as well as having experience building railways and these factors outweighed their disadvantage due to the geography of where the battle was being fought. ...read more.


He was resilient, honest and delegated jobs well as well as keeping in touch with public opinion and spending time over his party organisation, which ensured continued support of the Republicans and an appearance of unity between them. Leadership was important to the outcome of the war, as whilst military experience was useful in making tactical decisions, Lincoln's political leadership turned out to be far more effective in maintaining morale and unity, something which Davis failed at. Military leadership on the other hand was something in which both sides had their successes and weaknesses. However some of the South's military errors could have cost them the war. For example, it has been argued that whilst the South was tactically good, their generals did not match the Union ones such as Grant and Sherman. Robert E. Lee has been criticised for losing the West-and therefore the war- for the Confederacy, whilst his successor Beauregard made plans not based on reality. Bragg argued with everyone whilst Joe Johnston refused to take chances. The South has also been criticised for misjudging situations by losing their bravest men in costly attacks early on. However, the Union made many mistakes also, especially in the Virginia theatre and their mistakes did actually give the Confederacy a chance at victory. ...read more.


However as there were more and more casualties and the war continued for much longer than anyone had expected, the South became at a disadvantage as they did not have the money to finance a long war. Although the North could not really afford it either, they had gold reserves and money from customs in trade as an income to help them so they did not have to resort to acts and taxation as the South did. The North also had a much stronger economy, which was able to recover from the inflation much better than the South. As the North was industrialised it was much easier for them to supply their troops with both food and weapons due to the railroads, whilst this was much harder for the South as many of their railways had been destroyed by Union forces. All of these factors show that the South was at such a disadvantage regarding their troops, supplies and finance that they had no chance of ever winning a war which continued for that amount of time. Even though the South appeared stronger in the early battles, the fact that the North was so industrialised with a good economy and larger population of men of military age secured their victory in the long run. Chloe Hunter Total number of words- 2897 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the Confederate states lose the Civil War?

    one machine shop capable of building an engine for a respectable warship. It was very hard to transport troops, supplies and munitions. The South also had only two main east-west railroads, which were run by over 100 different companies, and gauges differed from place to place.

  2. To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

    In addition to this point a collaboration of historians express that "Events of 1918-22...in Russian society were far more complex than the simple Red-White struggle...the Civil War began as a war between the Bolsheviks and their socialist opponents - the...Socialist Revolutionaries"8.

  1. "The main cause of the American civil war was undeniably slavery". Assess the ...

    This was bought by the U.S in a treaty signed with France. The trouble arose when the issue of slavery came into it. The question was 'should slavery be permitted?' This was the first time the constitution had come under real scrutiny.

  2. The Deer Hunter and Apocalypse Now

    It was then that he realized that the VC was stronger than we were. They had the strength and will power to cut off all of the arms simply because they had something to do with Americans. There was no way to win a war in which the whole country

  1. "Why did the nationalists lose the civil war?"

    This act was known as the white terror. Chiang then created a national government in Nanking, and later on married Yatzen's sister in law. Meanwhile, as time passed, the CCP tried to rebuild bonds with people in cities and tried to gain support by creating propaganda in factories.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    On the surface, the LAA rebellion seemed spontaneous and reflected Muslim discontent within the army. In reality, however, the rebellion was orchestrated by Fateh and had well-defined objectives. For Fateh leaders, the Lebanese Army had always constituted a military threat to the PLO, not Lebanese militia forces.

  1. How did Black Southerners respond to the rising tide of racism and to attempts ...

    The amendment was meant to guarantee the continuation of black suffrage, however the southern states simply ignored the political ideals pushed upon it from the north. Poll taxes and literacy tests helped undermine the amendment and at the same time grant power to the white man.

  2. To What Extent can it be Argued that the North was Better Prepared to ...

    Confederacy could only call on about 2,000,000 men of military age to fight, the Union 7,000,000. As well as this, a majority of men in the US regular army remained loyal to the Union, and so did a large percentage of officers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work