• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Tsar able to survive Revolution in 1905 with his powers intact?

Extracts from this document...


Why was the Tsar able to survive Revolution in 1905 with his powers intact? [30] The Revolution of 1905 produced a lot of opposition for the Tsar from the three united classes; peasants, liberals and the industrial working class. It seemed at first that the Tsar had little chance of surviving because of his naivety in politics, and because all had turned against him, even his most loyal supporters. However, he survived this revolution with his powers intact. The Revolution itself was triggered by the peaceful protest in January 1905 which was fired upon by soldiers, called 'b****y Sunday'. From here, events escalated with three major classes striking and protesting. The reasons that these classes protested was because of a build up of economic factors like poor working conditions, high taxes, famine, but also political isolation. This, combined with the events of b****y Sunday, which kicked off the Revolution, shows that revolution was not a well planned event, and is widely seen as an accident, showing that the Tsar did not have that strong an opposition, and so could easily pacify the protests. Also, because the Revolution was a result of economic, not political factors, the Tsar could hold on to his powers because it seemed that no-one wanted to, or had any reason to, to overthrow him and could so contest that this, in fact, was not a revolution. ...read more.


This granted the Tsar the renewed support of his most loyal supporters, and allowed him to survive the 'Revolution' even more because of it. Again, the concession was very easily accepted, and the working class were so easily betrayed, and so created more doubts on whether you could call these events a Revolution because of the doubts on how much the Liberals really wanted reform. The peasants were also bribed with concessions which gave them what they wanted. With this group, the Tsar wanted to use the Okhrana, but Witte persuaded him otherwise because he realised that they were the main driving force in Russia. The Tsar, or rather Witte, brought off the peasants by reducing, and eventually abolishing their mortgage repayments, giving them what they were protesting for. Their land seizures and squatting dropped, and farming was on the up. This now meant that the Industrial Workers were now isolated, but now had more food resources, creating less of a reason to protest. With most of his opposition satisfied with the concessions, the Tsar was gaining more and more support, and so had more of a chance of surviving 1905 with his powers intact. ...read more.


Again, like the concessions, the Tsar was persuaded to publish this by Witte, and consequently showed that that Tsarist regime had no intention of allowing the concessions to seriously limit its absolute authority. It therefore seems that this could the main reason that the Tsar was able to survive 'Revolution' in 1905 with his powers intact. There were many aspects of 1905 that could have threatened the Tsar rule, but Nicholas was able to overcome these. He ultimately did this by isolating the main driving force of the protests; the Industrial Workers. He could only have done this, however, with the aid of Witte, who thought of, and persuaded the Tsar to publish the October Manifesto and the Fundamental Laws. (and aid the army) Other factors that allowed the Tsar to keep his rule was the fact that protestors were disunited and inexperienced, with a lack of revolutionaries, which also leads to the argument that the events of 1905 were, in fact, not a revolution, because most people did not want a revolution, and there was hardly any political involvement. Ultimately, I believe that main reason that the Tsar was able to survive Revolution in 1905 with his powers intact was because of his advice from Witte, which, in the end, allowed him the support of the majority of Russia, and stopped him escalating matters. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. was bloody sunday the prime reason for the 1905 revolution

    Even Witte was frustrated at the in inability of the tsars ministers to understand the turmoil that Russia was now in as he referred to the government policy as a 'mixture of cowardice, blindness and stupidity'. It was incompetence such as this and the loss in the Russo-Japanese war that led to social unrest and eventually revolution.

  2. How did Tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    Much of the credit for this lies with Sergi Witte, Nicholas Chief minister in 1905. He persuaded Tsar to make concessions to the Liberals in Russia to win their support. As a result the revolutionaries could be dealt with much harsher therefore reducing the impact of the revolution on the Tsarist Regime.

  1. Russian Revolution Sources Questions

    Trotsky had no chance against Stalin as he systematically got rid of all opposition, Trotsky was dealing with a very practical man, putting his ideas into practise and always going exactly to plan. If Trotsky had tried to fight back the struggle might not have been so easily won.

  2. To what extent was Tsar Nicholas II saved by making concessions in the 1905 ...

    Witte claimed that the Manifesto was a 'temporary concession', and argued that the Tsarist regime had intended to return to its old autocratic ways once the danger had passed. The Manifesto was accepted with readiness by the liberals and peasants, which suggests neither of the groups were serious about a revolution.

  1. Why did Tsarism survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917?

    For example people wondered if Father Gapon was really a priest or a secret Russian secret police agent. People also wondered about the Tsars involvement, though he wasn't there personally on that fateful Sunday, his guards fired on the innocent crowd demanding more rights like better working conditions for them and not the Tsar himself stepping down.

  2. Why did Tsarism survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917

    It was difficult for the revolutionaries to be united because their different aims meant they were divided and often fought amongst them selves; the Liberals wanted to share power with the Tsar, the Social Revolutionaries wanted peasant ownership over land, and the Social Democrats wanted a complete change of society and removal of the Tsar.

  1. What were the causes of the 1905 Revolution? Why did the Revolution fail to ...

    The nationalities in the Baltic area, the Ukraine, Poland and the south were each angry with the policy of Russification but their grievances were their own and they did not co-ordinate their activities or produce a unified programme. In Poland Catholic landowners lead the protests, in the Baltic states it

  2. Why did the 1905 revolution fail to overthrow the Tsarist regime?

    Although the army were the most important reason for the continual Tsarist rule, the opposition were however disunited and had no clear leader. It can be argued that if they did have even two strong leaders like in 1917 that they would have overthrown the Tsar, all of the opposition

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work