• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

a) Explain the different methods used by Judges when interpreting the meaning of an act of parliament.

Free essay example:

Statutory Interpretation

  1. Explain the different methods used by Judges when interpreting the meaning of an act of parliament.

In the English law the judges haven’t been able to agree on which approach should be used, they have developed four different ways to interpret law.

The rules take different approaches to interpretation and some judges prefer to use one rule, while a other judge would prefer another rule.

The literal rule gives court to give words their plain, ordinary or literal meaning, even if the result is not very sensible. The literal rule approaches problems of statutory interpretation by taking the words at their face value. This is illustrated in Whitely v chapel (1868) where the defendant pretended to be a person whose name was on the voters list, but who had died, he was found not guilty as a dead person is not in the literal meaning of the words, ‘entitled to vote’.

The golden rule is a modification of the literal rule. The golden rule looks at the literal meaning but the court is then allowed to avoid an interpretation, which would lead to an absurd result. Under narrow application the court may only choose between the possible meanings of a word or phrase. If there is only one meaning then this word must be taken. Under wider application of the golden rule is where the words have only clear meaning. An example of this is Re Sigsworth (1935) this is where a son had murdered his mother, the mother did not make a will so normally her estate would have been inherited by her next of kin, the court write into the act that the son would not be entitled to inherited where they had killed the deceased.

The mischief rule gives judges more discretion then the other two rules. The mischief law looks at the gap in the previous law and interprets the words to advance the remedy. For example Smith V Hughes this was to interpret a section of the street offences act.

Purposive approach is looking at the reasons why a law was passed and interpreting the words accordingly. E.g. Mellons V Newport corporation (1950). Which says that they find out the intention of parliament and carry it out by filling out the gaps and making sense. The purpose approach gives judges more discretion in their decision, It can lead to judicial law-making. Judges also made use of launguage rules.

Ejusdem Generis is general words which follow a list are limited to the same kind. A case example is Powell V Kempton Park Racecourse (1899)  this is where the defendant was charged with keeping a house, office, room or other place for betting. He had been operating betting outdoors. The court decided that the general words ‘other place’ had to refer to indoor places and so the defendant was not guilty.

Expressio Unius is the express mentioned if one thing that excludes others. For example; Tempest V Kilner where the court had to consider whether the statute of frauds act applied to a contract for the sale of stocks and shares. The list ‘goods, wares and merchandise’ was not followed by any general words, stocks and shares was not mentioned.

Noscitur a sociis which means that the words must be looked at in context and interpreted accordingly. It involves looking at words in the same section or others sections in the act.

For example; Revenue commissioner’s v frere (1965).

The court will make presumptions or assumptions about the law. If the statue clearly states the opposite, the presumption will not apply and it is said that the presumption is rebutted.  There are 4 important presumptions.

A presumption against a change in the common law, this mean the common law will apply unless Parliament has made it plain in the Act that the common law has been altered. For example Leach v R (1912) Where a wife could be made to give evidence against her husband under the Criminal Evidence Act 1898. The act did not expressly say that this would happen, the common law rule said that the wife could not be compelled to give evidence still applied.

A presumption that Mens Rea is required in Criminal Cases, this means that no one can be convicted of a crime unless it is shown that they had the required intention to commit it. For example; Sweet V Parsley (1970) the defendant was charged with being concerned with the management of premises, which were used for the purposes of smoking cannabis.

A presumption that the crown court is not bound by any statue expressly says no.

A presumption that legislation does not apply retrospectively, this means that the act of parliament will not apply to past happenings, each act will normally only apply from the sate it comes into effect.

Intrinsic aids are the matters within the statute itself that may help to make its meaning clearer. The court can consider the long title, the short title. An example of this is the Theft act 1968 states it is an act to modernise the law of theft. The long title may also explain briefly parliaments intentions.

Extrinsic Aids are matters, which are outside the act. Some external sources can help explain the meaning of an act. Undisputed sources are; Previous acts of parliament on the same topic, the historical setting, Earlier case law, dictionaries of the time. The three main extrinsic aids are Hansard the official report of what was said in parliament when the act was debated. Law reform bodies such as law commission. International Conventions, regulations or directives, which have been implemented by English legislation.  

B. Briefly consider the advantages and disadvantages of literal rule.

Advantages of the Literal rule is that it follows the words that parliament enacted, it also prevents unelected judges making law. The literal law prevents courts from taking sides in legislative or political issues. They also point out that ordinary people and lawyers do not have extensive access to secondary data. The literal rule results in a quick decision because the meaning is found in the dictionary or other source. The literal rule also respects parliamentary supremacy because a judges function is to apply the words of parliament and not to make law.  

Disadvantages of the Literal Rule is that it is not always possible to word an act so as to cover every situation, this can mean that an act does not have the effect parliament intended as in the case of whitely v Chappell where the defendant was charged under a section which made it an offence to impersonate any person entitled to vote. The defendant had pretended to be a person whose name was one the voters list, but who had died. The court held that the defendant was not guilty since a dead person is not, in the literal meaning of words, entitled to vote. Another disadvantage is that following the exact words can also lead to unfair or unjust decisions as in the Berriman case. Words may also have more then one meaning so that the act is unclear.

Criticism of the literal rule is that it is the oldest rule of construction and is till used today, mainly because judges may not legislate, some judges may prefer to stick to the law’s literal wording.  

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Law Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    There are four main ways, for judges to interpret Parliamentary legislation; they can use ...

    4 star(s)

    In the Person Act, the court decided that it did have another meaning, to go through the ceremony of marriage. The second usage of the golden rule, is the when the words have only one clear meaning, which would lead to a repugnant situation.

  2. Statutory interpretation

    In more simple terms the court should interpret an act in such a way so that the 'mischief' or gap is covered. From 1969 the Law commission described the mischief rule as a 'rather more satisfactory approach' than the other two established rules.

  1. Statutory Interpretation

    are entitled to make unless the Act being interpreted specifically states otherwise, and some external and internal aids to interpretation. The main presumptions in cases are: * that there has been no change to the common law * that the crown is not bound * the mens rea is required

  2. The literal rule that means judges must give the words in statute theirplain ordinary ...

    The Golden rule this is where the literal rule would lead to a result that was not clear. Then the judge could apply an interpretation that could avoid a bizarre outcome. This is where the judge has to look at the literal word and if it creates an absurdity then the meaning can be modified slightly and no further.

  1. The most conventional meaning of the 'legislative supremacy of Parliament' was adopted by Dicey

    Following the events of the 'Glorious Revolution', the Bill of Rights 1688 did not take the form of a conventional 'rights' documents. However, arguably that it was as much about the 'wrongs' of James II as it was about the 'rights' of the people.

  2. Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss.

    An Act of Parliament always starts life as a bill. Most bills are public bills intended to apply (in principle) to all people in any part of the country, such as the bills which eventually became the Theft Act 1968 or the Children Act 1989.

  1. Public law - Acts of parliament

    Here, a question arose to whether the compensation due to the appellants should be given according to the 1919 Act or according to the 1925 Act. The appellants argued that because of s7(1) of the 1919 Act, compensation should be calculated according to it.

  2. Becoming an Act of Parliament.

    The committee has the power to amend it in such a way, as to, ensure that it is in conformity with the general approval given by the House at its second reading. The report stage, at this point the standing committee reports the Bill back to the House for consideration of any amendments made during the committee stage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work