Alternative Dispute Resolution refers to methods of resolving disputes without going to court.

Authors Avatar by zhilinglim27gmailcom (student)

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Sometimes the courts are not the most appropriate places to resolve civil disputes as they may not produce the most satisfactory outcome. Alternative Dispute Resolution refers to methods of resolving disputes without going to court. This has proved to be effective and a necessary alternative over the years.

Resolving disputes via the fixed legal framework of court hearings may be inappropriate if parties prefer to be in control. The aggressive atmosphere in courts may divide the parties involved which may be detrimental if there is a need to sustain relationships. Judges may not have the technical knowledge required and would bring in expert witnesses. This incurs time and cost. Also, enforced solutions may not necessarily be the optimum solution that both parties would have preferred. Privacy is also an issue with court hearings as business disputes would be better kept private. Hence alternative dispute resolution has become increasingly popular as a necessary alternative to resolve disputes without the problems of court hearings.

There are various forms of alternative dispute resolution. Tribunals are specialist judicial bodies that decide on cases concerning particular areas of law. They give individuals the entitlement to certain social rights. It is said to be a ‘halfway house’ between formal litigation and informal forms of ADR. Examples of tribunals are Employment Tribunal, Mental Health Review Tribunal and Asylum Tribunal.

Join now!

Tribunals consist of 2 lay persons with expert knowledge and 1 chairman. Hearings in Tribunals are less formal and less intimidating. Each side is expected to put its case, but wigs and gowns are usually not worn and the strict rules of evidence are not applied. However, it is possible for individuals to be sentenced for contempt of court.

In the case of Peach Grey v Sommers, R claimed wrongful dismissal by his employer and sought to put some pressure on relevant witnesses. The court held that interference with witnesses in current proceedings before a tribunal amounts to contempt of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay