• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

AS LAW - Judicial Precedent

Extracts from this document...


Judicial Precedent Judicial Precedent Read Elliot and Quinn page 5 to 23. 1) Doctrine of Stare Decisis The English system of precedent is based on the Latin maxim: "Stare Decisis et Non Queita Movere", stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established. The idea is that by following precedents, which are the previous decisions of judges, fairness and certainty will be provided. Precedents can only operate if the legal reasons for past decisions are known. Therefore, at the end of a case (civil) there will be a judgement in which the judge will give not only the decision but also the legal reasoning which lies behind it. 2) Ratio Decidendi This is the legal reason or principal which lays behind the decision and it is this ratio which will provide the precedent for judges to follow in future cases. The remainder of the judgement is known as the: 3) Obiter Dicta "Other things said by the way." These comments do not form part of the ration (reasoning) and are therefore not part of the precedent. For instance, sometimes a judge will speculate on what his decision would have been if the material facts had been different. Sometimes, part of the Obiter Dicta may be put forward in future cases and although it will not form a binding precedent it may help to 'persuade' a later judge towards a particular view in the law. N.B. It is sometimes difficult to distinguish between ratio and any headings as the judgement is usually in continuous form without any headings specifying what is ratio and what is not. There may also be a number of speeches at the end of a case, depending on the number of judges sitting and how they have individually arrived at their judgement. This can mean that there is more than one ratio. Different Types Of Precedent. Original Precedent If a point of law has never been decided before, then whatever the judge decides will form a new precedent for later cases to follow. ...read more.


However this decision became increasingly unsatisfactory as the law could not alter to meet changing social conditions, nor could it alter to change wrong decisions expect per incuriam ones, except by passing a new act of Parliament DPP v Smith (1961). The Lords had ruled that intention could be judged objectively. This was out of line with previous common law and held to be wrong however it took a statute to change this ruling:1967 Criminal Justice Act. Because of the problems being caused by the House Of Lords voluntary abdication of it's power to change it's own decisions and particularly because of criticism caused by Smith. In 1966 Lord Gardener the Lord Chancellor issued a Practice Statement. Initially the Lords were reluctant to use this new power, but since the 1970's it has been much more willing to apply it in both criminal and civil law. Economic loss in the law of Negligence. This was an important decision because Anns's had led to considerable complexity and uncertainty in the law. In the criminal law where the liberty and reputation of the subject is at stake the Lords has also been willing to over-rule itself. In one case only a year after the previous decision. - Shivpuri (1986) over-ruled Anderton v Ryan (1985) Court of Appeal and the Doctrine Of Precedent. Civil Division. The Court of Appeal is bound to follow it's own previous decisions. There are only three exceptions to this rule and these exceptions were identified in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company (1944) The case involved the workman's appeal against a High Court decision, barring him from claiming damages after he had already accepted compensation under the 1925 Workman's Act. The appeal judges in deciding that they could not hold up the appeal emphasized the only circumstances under which the appeal court could overturn one of it's own previous decisions. These are: a) ...read more.


5) Case law of real situations - viable statute law and therefore rule and principles are derived from everyday life. This means that it should work effectively and be intelligible. Where unwelcome developments take place e.g. Negligence over Ann's - the Lords can correct the position using the 1966 Practice Statement. 6) The law can develop. There is flexibility especially since 1966. Look at the law on intention has changed since 1970, but also when Lords feel that change is leading to uncertainty again, as in Woolin: 1998 it can use it's power to reinforce the rule - Nedrick 1986. 7) Saves time - avoids unnecessary litigation. Disadvantages. 1) There are so many cases that it is hard for judges to find relevant cases and the reasoning may not be clear. 2) Case law can only change if a real case is brought. This requires someone to have the money (or the access to legal aid) to bring such a case. To take a case to the Lords is highly expensive. 3) Bad decisions are perpetuated since lower courts must follow higher courts (e.g. Anns) Very few cases get to the Lords which is the only court which can overrule one of it's own previous decisions. Not until 1991 (n R v R) was r**e in marriage accepted as a crime. 4) Restricts the development of the law. It leads to distinguishing and hair splitting decisions which rules the law unnecessarily complex e.g. the law on automatism and voluntary intoxication which has led to some diabetics having to use the defence of insanity to escape a conviction if their trance like state was caused by lack of insulin, whilst if their state was caused by failure to eat after taking insulin they can use the defence of automatism. The law on insanity is still based on the McLoughlin rules 1843. 5) It is difficult to distinguish between ratio and obiter e.g. Donoghue v Stephenson. 6) Too much distinguishing or use of Practice Statement damages certainty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher


    4 star(s)

    A binding precedent is only created when the facts of the second case are sufficiently similar to the original case and the decisions was made by a court which is senior too, or in some cases the same level as, the court hearing the later case.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial Precedent

    3 star(s)

    Obiter dicta are things said 'by the way', or 'other things said'. In a case the judge may speculate on what the outcome of the case would have been if the facts had been slightly different, this is a prime example of obiter dictum.

  1. Judicial Precedent

    the new one that reverses or overrules it is not a new law, nor a statement that the previous decision was bad law, but a declaration that the previous decision was 'not law', meaning it was the wrong answer. His view is that there is always one right answer, to be deduced from an objective study of precedent.

  2. explain judicial precedent

    In the civil system cases begin either in the county court or the high court, depending on the amount of money involved and the parties in involved etc. The actual case is normally about who did what to whom, or how much A owes B.

  1. Explain the distinction between the law and morals and consider the importance of the ...

    He argues that judges have the residual right to protect and preserve some sort of common morality. Moral contradictions in the law can also appear, while abortion can be carried out legitimately, the courts have refused action for 'wrongful life' in McKay v Essex AHA because it is contrary to the principle of the sanctity of life.

  2. Sanctions available in criminal Law

    The minimum sentence is named a tariff; however this sentence does not give the offender a right of release at the end of the tariff. At this point the parole board will decide whether this offender is safe to be released back into the community and if so, they will be released on licence.

  1. Understanding Young People, Law and Order

    The officer answering your call will need to know: * the exact location where police are needed * why they are needed * your own name, although you are not required to give it * your telephone number Giving evidence in court can be frightening, so it's a good idea

  2. Juvenile Justice

    In such cases, the juvenile may be placed in the custody of the Department of Juvenile Corrections. The Department may then place the juvenile in foster care, a group home, a hospital, secure confinement, or placement in another state. Although the Department has legal custody of the juvenile, which does

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work