• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the amount of protection which the law gives to a minor who enters a contract with an adult

Extracts from this document...


Assess the amount of protection which the law gives to a minor who enters a contract with an adult The basic principle of the present law is that a minor must be protected against his immaturity in his dealings with other persons. At the same time the policy of the law is to mitigate some of the hardships that might be imposed on persons dealing with a minor, so as to encourage them to enter into contracts that are for the minor's benefit. The contracts of a minor may be dealing with under the following three headings: contracts that are binding on the minor; contracts that are deemed void by the Infants Relief Act 1874; contracts that are binding on a minor unless and until he repudiates them. Where a minor enter into a contract with another person, whereby that person sells or supplies him with a necessary or necessaries, the contract will bind the minor. The courts have considered it in the minor's interest ( as well as that of the other party ) ...read more.


One exception to the rule is if the subject matter of the contract, with the minor, is considered necessaries. The Sale of Goods Act 1979 S.3 defines necessaries as goods that are suitable to the condition in life of the minor and to his actual requirement at the time of sale and delivery. Also, that the minor need only pay a reasonable price for the necessaries; which may not be the same as the contract price. Necessaries can include services such as education. In the English case of Nash v Inman the defendant, a tailor, supplied eleven fancy waistcoats and other items of clothing to a Cambridge undergraduate at a cost of �123. It was held that the tailor could not recover the money as the clothes were not "necessaries", the minor had a sufficient amount of his own clothes. Another exception to the rule is where a minor is bound by a service contract which is for their benefit. This does not mean that a minor is bound by any contract which is beneficial but only those which relate to an employment or similar contract. ...read more.


These have received special treatment, although (as Treitel points out) there is no logical reason why this should be so. However, the case law establishes that contracts concerning land, company shares, partnerships, family settlements and insurance are all voidable by the minor only if he denies the contract. Where a minor agrees to buy shares in a company then the contract is voidable at the minor's option. In Steinberg v Scala (Leeds) Ltd. a minor applied and partly paid for shares in the defendant company. However 18 months after the defendant company had allotted the minor the shares she decided to rescind the contract and also sued to recover the money she had initially paid to the defendant company. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to rescind the contract and would not be liable to make any further payments. However she was not entitled to recover the money she had initially paid the defendant company because there was a sufficient amount of consideration as she had been allotted the shares. This area of contract law may need to be rethought and areas within it cleared up as there is no need for a lot of the confusion that it can lead to. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    which came in later was not supported by a fresh consideration and yet it was argued that the previous request and the subsequent promise was deemed to be one transaction, and thus being a valid consideration after all. Another similar case which follows this line of thought would be Re:

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    involve person nature Death of Offeror * Guarantee is not terminated(each loan separate acceptance) * But some how, the offer can be terminated if the bank knew that the guarantor has died and his personal representative have no power under his will/for other reasons.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    THE REMEDY OF DAMAGES. "Unliquidated" - assessed by the courts. "Liquidated" - determined by the parties in a contractual term. The sum stated as liquidated damages must be a genuine pre-estimate of the actual loss likely to be suffered in the event of a breach.

  2. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    6 Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper [1941] A.C. 108 7 Mackinnon L.J. in Southern Foundries Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] A.C. 701, Altuntas v Safestore Trading Ltd [2003] EWHC 49 8 Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co Ltd [1957] A.C. 555; Reid v Rush & Tompkins Group [1990] 1 W.L.R.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    but a poor seventeen year old student would class that as a luxury. Needs is something that you have to have where wants is a desire. For example a seventeen year old would need food and water but may want to eat out every day at an expensive restaurant.

  2. Outline the basic rule of the law of contract regarding the effective revocation of ...

    Louise didn't add a new term into the contract which constitutes termination to the original offer but was asking for an extended date for delivery. Therefore the agreement between both parties is still in existence.

  1. Aspects of the law affecting construction projects.

    In a building contract if the contractor is sued he could regard the employer as partly to blame for any damage. He could then either serve a third party notice and join him as co-defendant or settle the claim out of court and seek a contribution from the employer within 2 years.

  2. Aspects of Contract and Business Law Case Studies

    If Henry knew his rights he would be able to take Ben to court to claim damages. Ben as the seller cannot refuse to sell the sculpture because once the acceptance is made neither party is allowed to back out of the contract or terminate it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work