• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case for a Bill of Rights

Extracts from this document...


Case for A Bill of Rights Currently within British politics there is controversy over the Issue of whether or not the UK Government should introduce a Bill of Rights. There are members or both the Tory and Labour parities that are for and against the Introduction of this document, David Cameron in particular is In favour of the introduction, claiming that 'current legislation is inadequate and hinders the fight against crime and terrorism.' (BBC NEWS) It is said that he believes the current Human Rights Act, which was established in 2000 has strong weaknesses which need to be addressed. However, others believe that those in favour of the Bill or Rights and against the Human Rights Act are simply so due to the fact that the Human Rights Act 'seem inconvenient' according to the Lord Chancellor. The most important reason why the Bill or Rights should be introduced is because with an entrenched document within the law with exact rules and regulations, the Government would not at any one point take away the civil liberties of UK Citizens. ...read more.


Recently, there have been cases in which criminals, such as terrorists and murderers, have claimed that the Human Rights Act protects them again deportation. In one case, a criminal claimed that his family that he was close to lived in England, and he would be psychologically affected had he been forced to move back to Italy to stay with his other family. The fourth and final reason of importance as to why the Bill of Rights should be introduced is that 'the rule of law' demands a clear statement of citizens rights and duties, which Britain is yet to gain. The population of England, Scotland and Wales do not have anywhere they can go to find their rights if they wish to, as the Americans can. There are no rules or rights given to UK Citizens that are set in stone, which is crucial for a population to have full faith In their Government. The most important reason why the Bill of Rights should not be introduced is because the law within Britain is contradictive of itself and in many cases loopholes are found in the Governments favour, if a Bill of Rights was written, it would be entrenched, concise and precise. ...read more.


The UK is known across the world for being a state where freedom is a priority. However, if a Bill of Rights was ensued, these freedoms would be largely restrained as the rights of the population were regulated and defined. Overall, the argument for a Bill of Rights is far stronger than that against, however the case against a Bill of Rights also has a number of highly valid points which are to be considered. For example, the fact that the rights to be entrenched would be decided by someone currently unknown to the public. Would the Government decide as a whole which rights to embed within the legal system? There would be major disagreements within Government if this were to be the case as the final outcome of these decisions would affect the UK for the rest of the country's existence. The Bill of Rights does seem to be, however, currently a resolution to many problems being faced by the Government and the state. If the safety of the people really is coming to be less important than the rights of an individual as written in the Human Rights Act, the UK are well on their way to self-destruction. Lucy Dark 6L0 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Human Rights

    On the whole, the CST Act appears to have been reasonably effective in addressing child s*x tourism, "since 1994, Australia has prosecuted ten people for offences relating to child s*x tourism in countries such as Cambodia and the Philippines. Eight of these prosecutions have resulted in successful convictions, with sentences

  2. Law case study

    The Children (Scotland) Act 1995 saw a change in direction especially in the terminology used. This was a move towards a more child centered approach, without losing the purpose that parents still have rights towards their children. What did change was more emphasis on responsibility.

  1. Extradition of terrorists

    not to be granted to secure the return of those 'suspected' of crimes as they have to be accused or convicted of the offence. This is a restriction that the government may face in the extradition of terrorism 'suspects.' Current anti-terrorism legislation in force in the UK can be found


    Quebec), the �sd and dollar system swiftly replaced the livre following the conquest by Britain. The dollar was called the piastre on some French language banknotes, whilst some bank tokens were issued in 1 and 2 sous denominations, equal to 1/2 and 1 penny (Wikipedia, Para.

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    However, the Court scrutinises more aggressively parents' retention of contact with children48, finding Italy to be in breach recently49, while not British authorities, which have done everything possible to enforce contact order50. Johansen expressly recognised need to follow UNCRC standard (Art.


    Such difficulty is due to different beliefs and having different meanings as to the content of culture. The confusions to the definition of culture were exemplified in a state report of the World Commission on Culture and Development (1996). Thus between these events the application of the word culture has

  1. The right to a fair trial is one of the key points established within ...

    the public in order to promote political, social or ideological objectives."5 Consequently, the Government recommended that existing anti-terrorist powers, which concerned Northern Ireland and international terrorism, be extended to include all forms of domestic terrorism. As the paper itself suggests, they sought a definition focused on "serious terrorist violence of all kinds"6.

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    A super-injunction is defined as the broadcasting of information about someone which is meant to be confidential or private and furthermore, stopping anyone from stating that the injunction even exists. A right to privacy, whilst never authorized in statute, has for a long time been recognised largely through the courts

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work