• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe, the way it is decided in which court the criminal trial will be held. Include all categories of offence.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe, the way it is decided in which court the criminal trial will be held. Include all categories of offence. There are two courts that hear criminal trials; Magistrates' and Crown Court. To decide the right court for the trial, this involves the category of crime implicated in the charge. Summary offences can only be tried at the Magistrates' Court; indictable offences can only be tried at the Crown Court, while triable either way offences may be tried at either court. Summary offences are the least serious criminal offences and are sub-divided into offences of different 'levels' - level one being the lowest level and level five is the highest. The use of levels allows a maximum fine to be set for each level which is increased in the line with inflation from time to time. The current maximum fines date from the Criminal Justice Act 1991 and are level one: maximum �200, level two: �500, level three: �1,000, level four: �2,500 and level five: �5,000. ...read more.

Middle

7. The magistrates decide the sentence. If the defendant pleads guilty the procedure becomes more complicated, as both sides produce evidence to the court. Since the burden of proof is on the prosecution, it will begin the case - usually by making a short speech outlining what the case is about and what they hope to prove. Prosecution witness will then be called one at a time to give evidence, and prosecutor will question each to establish what he or she saw and heard which is called the examination of the chief. The defence will then cross-examine that witness to test their evidence and try to show that it is not reliable. At the end of the prosecution case the defence can submit to the magistrates that there is no answer and that the case should be dismissed at this point, because the prosecution has to prove the case and if its evidence does not establish a case, then it must be dismissed. ...read more.

Conclusion

If sufficient the offender will be sentenced. If not, they will send the defendant to the Crown Court for sentencing. If the defendant pleads not guilty the magistrates must carry out 'Mode of Trial' proceedings to establish where the case will be tried. Under s 19 of the Magistrates' Court Act 1980 they must consider the nature and seriousness of the case, their own powers of punishment and any representations of the prosecution and defence. In rare cases where the Attorney-General, Solicitor-General or the Director of the Public Prosecutions is the prosecutor, the magistrates, under s 19(4) of the Magistrates' Court Act 1980, must send the case to the Crown Court if that is what the prosecution wants. Magistrates decide whether or not to accept jurisdiction. If the magistrates accept jurisdiction, the defendant elects place of trial; Magistrates' or Crown Court. If the magistrates refuse jurisdiction the defendant is sent to the Crown Court for trial. Notes: Did not mention indictable offences and which court they are held in. ?? ?? ?? ?? Law Essay: Courts Hierarchy By Ka-Shing Cheung Grade (B+) 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Murder - Notes and Evaluation.

    4 star(s)

    not a 'person in being' which has been seen as unfair in certain circumstances, as families have lost a mother and child but the killer will not be punished for the death of the child. However, extending the definition of murder to cover the death of a foetus would involve

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Voluntary Manslaghter - Notes and Evaluation.

    3 star(s)

    The defendant only needs to prove it on the balance of probabilities, which means that they must prove that they were suffering from 1.) an abnormality of the mind 2.) that arose from a specific cause 3.) which substantially impairs the defendants mental responsibility.

  1. Outline the range of duties undertaken by lay magistrates. Comment on how well Lay ...

    Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, employers are legally obliged to allow employees reasonable time off to serve as magistrates, although they are not obliged to pay them. National companies are in a much better position to give employees paid time off work than small organisations, which if they do give time off will not always pay them.

  2. Property Offences, Corporate Manslaughter and Police Powers of Search and Entry.

    only a control to search to the extent that is reasonably necessary for the purpose which the power of entry is exercised. Seize property The police are given powers to seize property from premises or persons so that they can examine it elsewhere.

  1. A person who genuinely attempts to commit a criminal offence and fails still deserves ...

    the race track and attempted to disrupt the race to force a "no race" where he could claim back his money. In this case the defendant cased a lot of disruption and had the mens rea and the intention to claim back the money he had put on the dog.

  2. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    Reg could be liable for either s.18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA) or s.20 OAPA. His conduct was voluntary and is a result crime that fulfils both legal and factual causation. The actus reus of s.20 OAPA is: it must be proven that the defendant either inflicted Grievous Bodily Harm or wounded the victim.

  1. The History and Main Features of Criminal Law in the USA.

    to inflict bodily injury on or to terrorize the victim or another; or to interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function. Kidnapping is one of the few crimes that are investigated by the federal government. Federal authority is based on the assumption that the victim will be taken across state boundaries.

  2. Critically discuss the Labour Governments record of crime control since coming to power in ...

    For example, in April 1998 many new offences were added, including many less violent crimes, whilst the introduction of the National Crime Recording Standard (NCRS), in April 2002, requiring a more prima facie approach to crime recording, whilst no doubt creating no accurate data in the long run, had the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work