• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by jury? Consider any alternatives and suggest improvements.

Extracts from this document...


Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by jury? Consider any alternatives and suggest improvements. In our English Legal system, the jury has been a long part of establishment for centuries. It consists of 12 lay people, who represent a cross section of the public. They listen to both sides of a case and decide a verdict, based on the facts presented to them. Some people think that trial by jury is fairer than a judge because the jury is independent and therefore could not be influenced by the government. In the Crown Court criminal cases, twelve jurors are used for indictable offences. The Queens Bench Division of High Court deals with civil cases and also contains twelve jurors. These are cases involving libel and slander, fraud, malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. In civil cases at a County Court, eight jurors are present although this is rare. Seven to eleven jurors are present at suspicious death cases at the Coroners Court. The most important is the Crown Court where juries decide whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. In the Juries Act 1974, jurors have to be selected at random from the electoral register. The Juries Act 1974 section 1, states to qualify for jury service a person must be aged between 18 and 70 (Criminal Justice Act 1988, section 119), registered as a ...read more.


If they cannot reach a unanimous verdict the judge may recall the jurors after at least 2 hours having elapsed. The Juries Act 1974, section seventeen allows for majority verdict to be used, normally eleven to one, ten to two, ten to one or nine to one. In open court the foreman must state the number of jurors agreeing with the verdict and the numbers disagreeing with the verdict. Only 6 - 7 % of jury decisions are by majority verdict. Juries cannot fall below 9 in number. At each Crown Court, there is an official who is responsible for summoning enough jurors to try each case that will be heard in a 2-week period. If a trial may be exceptionally long, or difficult potential jurors are asked if they will be able to serve to complete the trial (e.g. as in the Soham case (2003)). The problem in civil cases, especially libel cases are that they can be very long. R v Wright in 1995 lasted 17 months. If the jury fails entirely to agree, a verdict is not entered at all and retrial is ordered (If 2 consecutive juries fail to agree, the defendant is discharged). If the jury decide upon a verdict of not guilty, the defendant is discharged. ...read more.


(especially in fraud cases with assessors who had expertise in accounts and business management) . In New Zealand, defendants can choose not to be tried by a jury, but instead by a judge sitting on his own. In N. Ireland trial is by a single judge due to special problems of threats and jury nobbling that existed between sectarian parties. In some countries, a panel of 3 or 5 judges sitting all together hears cases. This allows for a balance of views, instead of a verdict by a single person. There are not enough judges in our English system to implement this and it would be expensive. I think that trial by jury in the English Legal system is very effective, however suggestions for improvement could be a system that operates in Scotland. They have a 'judicial examination ', which covers continuous judicial control of pre-trial preparation compared with the English system, which emphasizes the trial as the critical period of determining guilt or innocence. The Runciman commission suggested that the Contempt of Court Act 1981 should be amended to allow research into the working of juries. On the other hand people may be less willing to serve on juries if they knew that their discussions could be made public. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sabrina 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    the research was commissioned, were radical, and caused a lot of debate in the legal community. The scope of the recommendations went from plans for the removal of the defendants' right to choose trial by jury in triable either-way (TEW)

  2. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    The individual may end up stuck in a badly paid job with few prospects. Therefore crime seems a more profitable option. The basic surmise of labelling theory is that new offenders are destined for a life of crime as a result of the false assumptions that their negative master labels have drawn about their characters.

  1. The jury system or right to a trial by jury is often described as ...

    complex and the trial is likely to take a long time and be potentially burdensome, a trial judge may make an order for the case to be conducted without a jury.8 Every person is qualified to serve as a juror provided they are aged 18 to 70, on the electoral

  2. Trial by jury is more than an instrument of justice and more than one ...

    This could happen especially for a high profile case, where the media will publish all sort of news, which possible to mislead the jurors. One such case will be R v Taylor and Taylor, where 2 sisters were charged with murder and the newspaper published a still form of video consequence which gave the people a false impression.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    The main problem with this option is that it should be the duty of the party who is bringing the evidence forward to show that the evidence being provided is suitably reliable. This decision shouldn?t be made by a third party advisor who may not have the full insight into the case.

  2. Describe the process by which it is decided where a trial will take place. ...

    At this stage in the process, D enters a plea before the Magistrates Court to decide which court the case will be heard in. If D pleads guilty he has no choice regarding where the case is heard. If the Magistrates Court decide it doesn?t have jurisdiction to hear the

  1. The English Court System

    The Court of Appeal is an appellate court, meaning that it deals with appeals from the ?lower? courts. It is divided into two Divisions, criminal and civil, and is based at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. The judges of the Court of Appeal are the Lord Chief Justice, the Master of the Rolls.

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    His sister then claimed that her brother had had learning difficulties and that he only had the brain age of a 13 year old. For years she kept his case in the public eye, writing letters to politicians, giving interviews and talks and writing a book.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work