• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

European law

Extracts from this document...


In order to explain and evaluate the role and jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice1 I shall discuss the provisions of the European Community2 Treaty, which clearly provide for individuals to enforce rights derived from European Community law that are limited in their scope. This will be followed by the role of ECJ and how it has developed a number of principles that widen this scope. These are the doctrines of supremacy and direct effect, which are established to give individuals rights to enforce the European Union3 law. On the other hand, criticising the fact that that it restricts individuals rights in respect of challenging their decision. The European Union is a unique partnership in which many countries work closely together for the benefit of their citizens. Currently there are 27 member states of the EU, who have agreed to work collectively on issues such as common interest. The central purpose for the EC is to achieve a deeper economic and political integration, ('The ever closer union'). The EU desires for individuals to rely on the EU law in order to enclose uniformity hence enabling everyone to integrate in a common market. The common market, aims to increase a balanced growth on an economic and social level in respect of each member state. ECJ is one of the official institutions of the Community Treaty and plays a major part in the development of EC law by ensuring uniformity. The function of ECJ is to "ensure that in the interpretation and application of this Treaty the law is observed"4. The ECJ has done this by using the purposive approach and undertaking the aim to integrate into a single common market. Along with taking the role to ensure that the EU's institutions do not go beyond the powers they attain under the Treaty. What's more, the ECJ can be seen as the other side of the coin from the other courts, as it takes the role to comply the law rather than applying it. ...read more.


Nevertheless, the Court was certainly influenced by the rebellion from the French Conseil d'Etat and the German Bundesfinanzhof. Anderson, writing at the time, commented that: "The present concern of the Court is to consolidate the advances of the 1970s rather than face the legal complexities and political risks of attempting to extend the doctrine further".23 It is likely in the light of Marshall, that decisions will also have vertical direct effect only. The ECJ's rejection to allow the horizontal direct effect of directives resulted in diminishing their effectiveness. In sequence to put this right they developed the doctrine of indirect effect24. This concept was first introduced in the cases of von Colson and Kamann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen25 and Harz v Deutsche Tradax GmbH26, which came before the Court on the same day. The plaintiffs in both cases sought to invoke the provisions of Directive 76/207 (the Equal Treatment Directive) in almost identical circumstances. The distinction was that in von Colson the Directive was being invoked against the German prison service (a public body) and in Harz the Directive was being invoked against a private employer. The Directive in question had been implemented by the German authorities, but the implementing legislation did not appear to provide an adequate remedy as required by the Directive. The ECJ held that the national court was obliged to interpret the implementing legislation so as to give effect to the Directive. The case was referred back to the German Labour Court who re-interpreted the national law and awarded damages to the plaintiffs in both cases. The court went further in Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentaci´┐Żn SA27 and held that the principle of indirect effect applied whether the national legislation being construed was enacted before or after the Directive. In that case the Spanish authorities made no attempt whatsoever to implement the Directive in question, so there was no question of assuming that the intention of the authorities had been to give effect to the Directive. ...read more.


Chalmers.D, Hadjiemmanuil.C, Monto.G and Tomkins.A, European Union Law, (2006), Text and Materials, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, page 48 12 Chalmers.D, Hadjiemmanuil.C, Monto.G and Tomkins.A, European Union Law, (2006), Text and Materials, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, page 49 13 Case 41/74 [1974] ECR 1337 14 Case 9/70 [1970] ECR 825 15P.J.G Kapteyn and P. Verloren van Themaat, 1998, Introdution to the Law of the European Communities, 3rd edition, edited and further revised by Laurance W.Gormley in cooperation with the edititors of the fifth edition Dtch edition, Kluwer Law International, page 530. 16 Busby.N and Smith.R, 2006-2007, Core EU Legislation, Law matters publishing, Article 234, page 51 17 Minister of the Interior v Cohn-Bendit [1980] 1 CMLR 543 18 VAT Directives[1982] 1 CMLR 527 19 Case 148/78 [1979] ECR 1629 20 Case 43/75 [1976] ECR 455 21 Case 152/84 [1986] ECR 723; [1986] 1 CMLR 688 22(that is, to form part of the law of the Member States without further implementation) 23 Anderson D, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review (1988) XI 91, 100, cited in Weatherill S, 'Cases and Materials on EC Law', 2nd edition, 1994, Blackstone, at p.80 24 Also, known as 'the interpretation obligation'. 25 Case 14/83 [1984] ECR 1891 26 Case 79/83 [1984] ECR 1921 27 Case C-106/89 [1990] ECR I-4135 28 Costa v Enel 1964 ECR 585 CMLR 425 29 Case C-213/89 R v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte 30 Regulations, decisions, and directives 31 Actions for the review of the legality of acts of community institution. 32 Actions for failure to act 33 Actions for damages 34 Treaty of Nice 35 European of Parliament 36 Case C-70/88, European Parliament v Council. 37 Foster.N, 2006, Foster on EU Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, page 228 38 Case C-50/00P, Union de Pequenos Agricultores v Council 39 See Case C 309/89 Cordoniu v Council and 790/79, Calpak 40 Steiner J, Woods L, and Twigg-Flesner.c, 2006, EU Law, 9th edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press, page 228 ?? ?? ?? ?? 06231188 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

A thorough essay, but the topic in question is not entirely clear.

It should be noted that the Article numbers need updating in view of the TFEU.

4 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 18/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case

    4 star(s)

    In the case Olley v Marlborough Court Ltd (1949)1, an exclusion notice in a hotel was not displayed until the hotel room itself and on these grounds the terms on the notice were excluded from the contract because the contract was deemed to have been formed at the reception desk.

  2. Police powers to grant bail

    For example, surrendering one's passport, reporting regularly at a police station and for a person to stand as surety for them. The defendant can appeal against unfair bail conditions but this is rarely exercised. An appeal to a refusal of bail is decided upon by a judge in the chambers of the Queen's Bench Division (QBD)

  1. Evaluate police powers of arrest, detention and search.

    previously indicated in a consultation paper that the PACE regime should be amended by 'Moving towards a straightforward, universal framework which focuses on the nature of an offence in relation to the circumstances of the victim, the offender and the needs of the investigation'.6 They proposed that this end could

  2. The task of the jury is to weigh up the evidence presented to them ...

    Even though it is just one percent, this can mean up to 30,000 trials and that are usually the most serious offences, such assaulting a police officer or drunk driving are dealt with in the magistrates court while the most absurd theft can be tried in the Crown court.

  1. Before 2005 there were three main problems with the appointment procedures which is the ...

    One of the key recommendations be made, was that a Commissioner for Judicial Appointments should be appointed to provide independent monitoring of the procedures for appointing judges and Queen's Counsel. This recommendation was taken on board by the Government and the first Commissioner was appointed in 2001.

  2. The role and appointment of judges.

    He/she will then discharge the jury, and if the case has been long and distressing, excuse the jurors from any further jury service. If the jury find the defendant not guilty, the judge will free the defendant. He/she will then discharge the jury and make appropriate order about the cost of the trial.

  1. Outline the main purpose and roles of two contrasting Uniformed Public Services.

    The patients are then treated to a nearby facility and depending on the injury, finally transported again to a more advanced medical facility by using aircrafts such as; C-17 Globe master, C-130 Hercules and other types. Another word for Medical evacuation is ?MEDEVAC?.

  2. Report on hierachy of courts and legal personnel.

    There are different routes for appealing from the County Court and the High Court, the value of claims and the level of judge who heard the case affects which appeal route will be used. Appealing from the court of appeal may be directed to the Supreme Court under administration of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work