• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

"Examine why s****l offenders attract so much attention these days. How has the Criminal Justice System responded to societies anxieties?"

Extracts from this document...


Victims, Public Protection and Risk "Examine why s****l offenders attract so much attention these days. How has the Criminal Justice System responded to societies anxieties?" In preparing for this essay it has been identified that s****l offenders are not a homogenous group of individuals and that this is an umbrella term used to describe a range of behaviours ranging from acts of voyeurism and exhibitionism, to more serious acts of pedophilia and r**e. For the purpose of this essay I have chosen to focus on the more serious forms of s*x offending which in my opinion, are the cause of much of the current attention. In order to understand why s****l offenders attract so much attention I will begin by considering today's society and the emergence of post-modernist values and the preoccupation with risk. I shall then go on to consider the factors which have influenced this current climate. These include the media and its portrayal of high-profile cases like that of Sarah Payne and Sidney Cooke, actions taken in the USA to manage dangerous offenders and the introduction of new offences of 'grooming' spurred by the growth of the internet. Following this I shall concentrate on how the Criminal Justice System has responded to society's anxieties and public protection needs. I will consider the range of strategies implemented to manage and reduce risk, including new legislative provisions, the creation of a s*x Offender Register, development of risk assessment tools, Multi-Agency working and accredited programmes. Finally I will consider the effectiveness of such interventions and whether the current preoccupation with public protection and management of offenders has been introduced at the expense of this category of offenders, who are now at risk of over inclusiveness and erosion of their human rights. Social Theorists have noted a shift from what was once a 'modernist' society to one with post-modernist values (Beck 1986, Giddens 1990 & Garland 1985). ...read more.


Recently, the Criminal Justice Act (2003) has introduced Extended sentences for Public Protection (EPP) and Indeterminate sentences for Public Protection (IPP) to further restrict liberty in the interest of public protection. Decisions on who may be sentenced to such will be dependent upon the level of risk they pose, and whether or not they can be managed in the community. The Criminal Justice Act (2003) also introduced 'grooming' as a criminal offence, following heightened awareness of the dangers of this. The aim is to proactively monitor those who make contact with children online in order to engage in s****l activity offline and to intervene to protect the child before any physical or s****l harm is caused. The s****l Offences Act (2003) also modernises the law on s****l offences and introduces new offences designed to protect complainants of either gender who suffer from mental disorder. Multi-Agency Public Protection Panel Panels (MAPPPs) have been introduced under the Criminal Justice Court Services Act (2000) to create a seamless approach to the management of s****l offenders (Home Office 2001a). Police, probation and prison officers (following implementation of the Criminal Justice Act 2003), have a statutory duty to implement inter-agency arrangements for the assessment and management of 'the risks posed by s****l and violent offenders' (Home Office 2001a). The government now allows representatives of local communities to sit in on MAPPPs meetings so that a local community view on risk management can be expressed. Furthermore MAPPPs are required to produce and publish annual reports of their activities both of which demonstrate a marked attempt to ensure greater accountability (Kemshall 2003, p90). To reduce the likelihood of s*x offender recidivism a number of Interventions have been introduced under the s****l Offences Act (2003). These include; s*x Offender Treatment Programmes (SOTP) run in prisons which aim to assess and treat all s****l offenders serving a sentence of four or more years (Craissati, 1998). ...read more.


Also, risk levels are not static, therefore offenders must be subjected to regular risk reviews in order to proactively identify any changes in the level of risk they pose. In order to conclude, it has been identified that we are currently living in a post-modernist society obsessed by risks which threaten our existence. These risks have been further exacerbated by globalisation and the onslaught of saturated and distorted messages of risk. Also by the creation of moral panics spurred via our sensationalist media portraying s****l offenders as 'mad, sad or bad' and a dangerous risk to society which has elevated them into the position of 'folk devil'. This has led to the creation of a wealth of legislative provisions, including the introduction of a s*x Offender Register, extended sentences, multi-agency working and the formation of new s****l offences. Interventions have also been designed in an attempt to reduce the risk of re-offending, including accredited programmes, restriction orders and increased use of electronic monitoring. However, in adopting these new ways of working we have had to swallow a number of principles including innocent until proven guilty, proportionate sentencing, avoidance of double jeopardy and balance of individual and community rights, including right to know and offenders right to privacy. Primary support appears to be in the willingness of successive governments to endorse a populist, tabloid driven agenda in order to promote itself as an effective organisation. Whilst this may appease the public, such attempts to curb s****l offences by incarceration and placing restrictions on liberty may not be as effective as perceived. In my opinion, greater provisions for management in the community may prove to be more effective and could aid the successful re-integration of this category of offenders. However, this will not be achievable until the media finds another group of individuals on which it can focus its attention, or until we have a better understanding of s****l offenders making us less fearful and more tolerating of such offenders. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Non-fatal Offences?

    3 star(s)

    These words are not for the 21st century and can cause confusion, therefore resulting in an injustice verdict. Accompanying, this even lawyers and judges say assault when they actually mean battery. Thus one could argue that the current law on non fatal offences is not satisfactory.

  2. Evaluate how effectively governments and our legal system have recognised and responded to the ...

    Legislation was placed within all the states (except Tasmania) for the protection of the Aboriginals. The main features of this legislation were the segregation of the non-indigenous society, the establishment of the reserves to facilitate this and the state control.

  1. THE ACCESS to JUSTICE ACT 1999 Civil Cases The state funding of civil cases ...

    to pay both the success fee and also the insurance premium paid. The Access to Justice Act 1999 now allows Conditional Fee Agreements to be used for all cases except medical negligence cases. This generally is due to the difficulty and uncertainty involved with medical negligence cases but this may change in the future.

  2. Principles on which sentencing decisions are based

    In particular, persons convicted whilst adults of a second serious offence (which includes murder, manslaughter, r**e or robbery and certain other offences) will be subject to life imprisonment unless the court sentencing the second offence finds that there are exceptional circumstances.

  1. Describe the different aims of sentencing.

    This means that it can also act as a strong deterrent as people do not want their licences confiscated as not only can they not drive but may be treated differently concerning employment or loans.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    To ensure that the expert has sufficient knowledge to direct the jury it must be asked whether ?...the witness has acquired by study or experience sufficient knowledge of the subject to render his opinion of value in resolving the issues before the court...?[11].

  1. The English Court System

    The government that runs the country and is formed from the political party that wins most seats in the House of Commons in a general election. The Government formulates policy and introduces legislation in Parliament. Most senior members of the government are memebers of House of Commons but, there are ministers, along with the 2 cabinet member.

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    back into the court system where further information comes to light or where there is continuing public concern. The cases will only be referred to the Court of Appeal if some new evidence or argument comes to light. The defendant must have sought an appeal on his own behalf and failed if it does get raised.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work