Especially people who live in developed countries take basic rights for granted such as the right to a good education, the right to freedom of speech or religion, or the right to life. Many people think that every child, at least in developed countries has these opportunities, and they might think that these rights are actually applied, but reality is something very different from what we are actually taught. Poverty and child abuse is much closer to us than we think it is, and that is why this topic should concern much more people than what it actually does, and does capable of changing this situation to act.
This topic has interested me for quite a long time, as I like to and I wanted to investigate and verify if those rights that children supposedly have, are applied in those countries that signed the treaty. Specially, when I first started researching information for this essay, I found very interesting how the United States, nowadays a world power, has not ratified this Convention on the Rights of the Child. It is true that by signing this treaty the US took a great step, but what keeps it from ratifying it? In my investigation I am also going to look in particular at the situation of the United States, as I am interested in what and how is done there to accomplish their purposes and prevent children abuse.
-What was the political, social, economical and historical situation at the time the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child was adopted? Circumstances that took the United Nations to adopt this new agreement.
At the time the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child was adopted, the situation in the world was not quite stable. Many conflicts were being fought all over the world, in which children had to work as hard as anyone else to help their families. Some of them did not have enough food, sanitation or education. This Convention meant a new step towards the welfare of children.
-How did the countries cope with these rights and did they actually do anything to favor the situation of the children in it? What were the results of these changes and their effect on society?
The Convention on the Rights of the Child signed in 1989 started a new era for the children and the adoption of their rights. It meant new opportunities and hopes for the children, although probably most of them did not know that they had rights and just assumed that they had to be slaves or work long days as a routine because that was what they were asked to do, most of the times receiving a few coins or nothing at all.
This Convention signified that these children could start a new life if these principles were applied. Governments, especially in developed countries, promoted them and NGO’s supported these actions.
Not every country though has realized that not giving those rights and new options to their young citizens is going against the Convention, and therefore it is illegal for them to keep them from those rights and deprive them from basic necessities.
-What was the situation of the children at the time the agreement was accepted and what is their condition nowadays? Has this situation actually improved all over the world during this period of time?
In 1959 many countries signed the Declaration of the Human Rights. This was the first step towards human justice and equality. Although the Human Rights also included children, something had to be done specially for them. Somehow, children and women are most of the times omitted from great decisions, although the consequences may affect them.
Nowadays many children throughout the world live in dreadful conditions. We only see what we have close to us, and that is mainly a high standard of living, in which high percentages of children go to school and have the basic needs. But what we do not see is much larger than that. Thousands of children die from malnutrition, diseases, slavery, and lack of sanitation every year. People and countries became more concerned about that and NGO’s and charities became more popular. They realized that this situation would worsen with time. Almost every country in the world signed the Convention, although still nowadays many of them do not apply some of them. Poverty and hunger is still a nowadays issue, and we all should be concerned about that.
- What is it that keeps the United States of America from signing this treaty?
The United States has a large variety of citizens, and therefore many different beliefs, lifestyles and political views. One of the reasons that may keep the United States from ratifying the Convention is the fact that some conservative American communities have argued that the treaty could be “anti-family”. It cannot be denied that the situation of American children has improved since the agreement was signed, but there is still too much left to do. Figures show that the U.S has the highest percentage of children in poverty (around 23% in 1986).
- Conclusion. Has the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child been an actual improvement for the children and their condition in the world since 1989 until these days?
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child has indeed been an improvement in the situation of the children throughout the world, but there are still millions of children and people in general suffering from the consequences of war, malnutrition and lack of resources, as few examples. There still many things to be done, starting from applying the Convention on the Rights of the Child in all those countries that signed the treaty. If all of them had actually carried out these articles, children all over the world would have the basic education, sanitation, food…
Governments have the possibility of changing this situation that concerns so many people with the support of their citizens. There are many campaigns that support actions in developing countries, but more could be done for the benefit for those less fortunate children and their families that have to suffer since they are very young.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books:
-Davidson, Scott. Human Rights. Buckingham: Open University Press. 1993.
-Dewing, Carol; Hansen, Carol Rae and Wilde, Ralph. Human Rights. Phoenix: The Oryx Press. 1999.
-Farson, Richard. Birthrights. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc. 1974.
-Kielburger, Craig and Major, Kevin. Free the children. HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. 1982.
-Lansdown, Gerison, ed. Wood, Emily and Wickremasinghe, Ravi. Trans. Wadhini, Hermant. Children’s Rights: A second chance. London: International Save The Children Alliance. September 2001
-Redman, Nina and Whalen, Lucille. Human Rights. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, Inc. 1998.
-Selby, David. Human Rights. Cambridge: Open University Press.1987.
-UNICEF. Human rights for children and women: how UNICEF helps make them a reality. New York: UNICEF. 1999.
-UNICEF. The state of the World’s Children 2002. Leadership. New York: UNICEF. 2002.
Internet sources:
-Convention on the Rights of the Child. UNICEF. 26 February 2002.
<http://>. [16 March 2002]
-Free the Children International. Campaigns. Children’s Rights. 2000. [8 May 2002]
-Robert F. Drinan. U.S Ratification of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child Would Benefit Children.
-Trabajo infanto juvenil en America Latina y el Caribe. Oficina Regional para América Latina y el Caribe. 1999. >. [16 March 2002]
-Statistics: revealing a hidden tragedy. International Labour Organization (ILO). 31 October 1997. . [13 March 2002]
Free the Children International, Children’s Rights (2000) [5 May 2002]
Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. International Schools Trial. <http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/OVRC?c=1&docNum=X3010116223&bConts=1737&txb=%2522Convention+on+the+rights+of+the+Child%2522tab=1&origsu=child+rights…> [5 May 2002]