• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effectively do the courts protect human rights?

Extracts from this document...


How Effectively Do The Courts Protect Human Rights? Before looking at this question in detail it is necessary to know what rights are. There are mainly two types of rights, the natural rights and the citizens' rights. The natural rights can be described as universal God-given and inalienable. These include rights to life, liberty and property. On the other hand, citizens' rights are those that are granted to citizens by the state. The United Kingdom does not have an entrenched "Bill of Rights" like the United States. This in theory means that there is no codified document setting out the various rights granted to the citizens of the United Kingdom. However, citizens' rights in the United Kingdom have been protected traditionally by a combination of statute law, common law and case law. Some of the most significant rights of a British citizen are freedom of expression, personal freedoms, political rights, right to own property and the right to freedom from torture. ...read more.


In some other cases a citizen might feel that they have been unfairly treated by a public body such as the NHS. In such cases the other cases of a similar nature are taken into account and all relative factors are considered. Cases of judicial review are not very common and are not usually successful. This is mainly due to the fact that there is a fusion of powers in the British political system. The Lord Chancellor who elects the judges is a member of the Prime Ministers cabinet and hence the judges might not be able to make a fair decision due to pressure from the government bodies. Also the judges cannot enforce their decisions. The European Court of Justice also helps protect the human rights. It is the main court of the European Union and interprets the Europe Union law and deals with disputes between the European states. However, it can also be used when citizens from the European states believe that their rights, guaranteed by the European law, have been neglected. ...read more.


However, chiefly it is the government majority that is decisive and makes the final decision. The House of Lords, although limited in its powers than the Commons, is also effective to an extent in protecting the human rights. It can delay legislation for a year and any amendments it proposes must be returned to the Commons for approval. For example, the Welfare Reform Bill in 1999. The reform to the membership of Lords in 1999 has potentially strengthened its independence. However, a strong determined government can easily get its way through the supremacy of the House of Commons. Lastly, the members of Parliament can also help to protect individual rights. They may take up cases of one or a group of their constituents. They are given fast access to ministers and senior civil servants. However, the government need not act on their requests. Hence, overall I can say that the courts are effective to an extent in protecting the human rights. However, it is due to several factors that I have mentioned above, some of which are more influential than the others. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Examine the relationship between law and morals and consider whether the law should support ...

    House of lords ruled their behaviour was in breach of the criminal law of assault and couldn't claim defence of consent to excuse their acts. Even so, Devlin's theory has been criticised.

  2. Juvenile Justice

    Juveniles usually commit these offences as to get money. The ACT Human Rights Act 2004 came into power on 1 July 2004 and is Australia's first human rights legislation. The Human Rights Commissioner has permission to review and report to the Attorney General on compliance with the Act The purpose of this review was to ensure that the delivery

  1. Law and Justice

    right to fair trial includes the right to take adequate time to prepare a defence. The rules also require juries, judges and magistrates to be without bias, shown in the case of R v Bingham ex parte Jowitt, where the defendant was convicted on the word of a police officer,

  2. Human Rights

    For example, in the case R v John Scott Holloway 1996, Holloway was charged with engaging in s****l intercourse with two 14-year-old boys in Phnom Pen. The prosecution case heavily relied on the evidence of the two boys. Due to difficulties in obtaining evidence such as videos and photos in

  1. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    and disability discrimination cases * debt problems * employment problems Since the implementation of the Woolf Reforms (which resulted from Lord Woolfs Access to justice reports 1996), civil cases are assigned to one of three 'tracks' according to their value.

  2. EU law and Human Rights

    It was not before long that the growing voices of dissent formed a chorus too loud for the UK government to turn a deaf ear to. Claiming that their liberties being put in such a precarious position meant that it was open to 'invasion by the judiciary'7, citizens demanded for a change.

  1. "Public policy has been slow to treat disability as a matter of equality, human ...

    education rights of disabled students in contrast those of able bodied students, and therefore the shape of the future employment market. However instead I have chosen to study the DDA provisions for Employment because this is the next step on the path to disabled people achieving the independence which according

  2. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    2 due to mother's right to protection of her health, superior to father's views. Unfortunately, the Court failed to clarify scope of abortion rights too9, so a broad margin of appreciation exists and it is yet uncertain whether unborn child may qualify as an entity for "protection of rights of others" in Art.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work