• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In relation to voluntary manslaughter discuss the suggestion that the current law is satisfactory and not in need of reform.

Extracts from this document...


In relation to voluntary manslaughter discuss the suggestion that the current law is satisfactory and not in need of reform. Diminished responsibility can be used as a defence if the defendant had an abnormality of mind, which was a cause of the killing. This is more satisfactory than having to use insanity for a defence, however there are still problems with it. The burden of proof should not be on the defendant, in most other defences the defendant only has to raise the issue and the prosecution has to disprove it. This should also apply to diminished responsibility. At the moment defendants pleading diminished responsibility are at a disadvantage which is not faced by those raising provocation. ...read more.


Also the law commission has pointed out that there is a disagreement on whether the concept of 'substantial impairment of mental responsibility' is a medical question. This should not be decided by doctors as this is a moral question. The wording can also confuse the jury and a lack of understanding leads to inconsistent decisions. There is also in many cases, an overlap of the defences diminished responsibility and provocation, as the jury has to take into account the defendants mental state when deciding if provocation should succeed. This can cause confusion when they put forward both defences, as for provocation the defence only have to raise the issue, but for diminished responsibility the defence has to prove it on the balance of probabilities. ...read more.


This means that a completely innocent person can be ruled as provocation and that the victim doesn't have to realise its actions are provoking. Provocation provides a defence for anger, but there is no defence for people who kill in fear or out of despair or compassion. Why is it that people can be excused because of anger when surely people who kill in fear or out of despair or compassion should have a defence? Some reforms have been proposed. One is that only 'gross provocation' would be accepted for provocation. This would prevent cases such as Doughty been successful. The partial defence should not be applied where the provocation was incited by the defendant for the purpose of providing an excuse to use violence or if the defendant acted in considered desire for revenge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is the current law on the non-fatal offences against the person satisfactory?

    4 star(s)

    Until Burstow; Ireland in 1997, it was unclear whether words alone could constitute an assault. It was decided that an assault could be committed by words in any format, whether spoken or written, thus developing the law to cover media such as email and text messages, which had not been invented when the Act was passed.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Critical evaluation of murder for A2 law unit 4

    3 star(s)

    There is also a problem with the sentence for murder. If someone is found guilty of murder, no matter what the circumstances they were under, the sentence for murder is always life. The judge cannot choose a different sentence even if the defendant isn't as blameworthy as a deliberate killer.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss whether the rules governing insanity as a defence in criminal law are in ...

    3 star(s)

    The defendant must have disease of the mind. 2. The defendant must have defect of reason. 3. The defendant did not know the nature and quality of the act he was committing. OR 4. The defendant did not know that his actions were legally wrong.

  2. Murder and Voluntary manslaughter - analysis of cases and the plea of involuntary manslaughter.

    This was seen in the case of Pagett 1983. Legal Facts: Defendant armed with a shotgun and cartridges, shot at police who were attempting to arrest him. Defendant held a 16-year-old girl who was pregnant by him as a shield.

  1. Property Offences, Corporate Manslaughter and Police Powers of Search and Entry.

    with the following information, or alternatively if not the search can not begin, these include the following: * proof of their warrant card * information on police powers to stop and search * your rights * the police officer's name and police station * the explanation for the search *

  2. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    In my judgement the condition of the brain is irrelevant and so is the question whether the condition is curable or incurable, transitory or permanent. ? This judgement made by Lord Devlin meant that from then on, any disease that caused the defendant to suffer a defect of reason, qualified as a disease of the mind.

  1. Critically discuss the Labour Governments record of crime control since coming to power in ...

    in 2004-5, and BCS crime levels were three times higher than the recorded crime levels, although most of it is not very serious; unreported crimes generally involve much lower levels of financial loss, damage, and injury than those reported to the police; in 2004-5, 71% of the comparable subset of

  2. How Satisfactory Is The Current Law On The Deception Offences?

    There are two different cases which are prominent in this instance. In DPP v Ray the courts stretched the law to include silence where the defendant had changed his mind about paying. This appears to give an unjustified meaning to deception.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work