• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

International Criminal Court-the Scope for Intervention.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

International Criminal Court-the Scope for Intervention. By Kirill Kruchinin Allegations of war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity have undoubtedly received unprecedented press coverage in recent years - more than at any time since Nuremberg. This is not because the incidences of such barbarities have increased - ARE YOU SURE? - , but simply because those crimes are brought to us more rapidly these days BY THE ELECTRONIC MEDIA. Since the early 1990's the international community has witnessed of a variety of criminal tribunals that were meant to promote peace-making and political transition in situations of gross violations of human rights and armed conflict among ethnical or religious groups. This tendency led to the establishment BY THE UN of two ad hoc Tribunals-for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda-and OF the International Criminal Court (ICC). There was also a proliferation of 'mixed' judicial bodies-in Cambodia, Sierra Leone, Kosovo and East Timor-composed of both national and international judges and enforcing domestic as well as international criminal law. It is perhaps most cynical to assert that transitional societies, convalescing from conflict or moving from oppression towards democracy, have developed a variety of ways of dealing with past war crimes and human rights abuses. ...read more.

Middle

In particular, the powers of judges were strongly curtailed to assuage the fears of a number of states that the Court could infringe upon their sovereignty. The results will invariably preclude the necessary judicial development of the law and restrict the judges substantially to a mechanical function. These limitations appear to demonstrate certain mistrust by various States in the independence of international criminal courts, and they also raise a number of questions concerning the ability of the International Criminal Court to function efficiently as a court of law and the ability of its judges to fulfil their mandate. A notion put forward by a distinguished International Law professor - GIVE HIS NAME - highlights an additional difficulty the ICC faces, stating that "crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide, are highly context-specific." They are acts committed either during war (between or within nations) or by repressive regimes that when these crimes are finally addressed, it is usually during enormous social and political upheaval: the negotiation of a peace treaty, restoration of legitimate political rule, or some similar milestone. In such circumstances, there are typically other priorities to be considered than just punishing those who committed crimes during the preceding turbulence. ...read more.

Conclusion

Clearly International justice and the role of the Tribunals, is not about unfair retribution; if that were the case, humanity should forget about reconciliation and its off-shoot, peace. It is not about vengeance, using the pen as the firearm, much as the victims' plight has been acknowledged; that would be erroneous, such a practice would amount to accepting the erroneous view that you can conquer hatred with hatred. However after considering alternatives to prosecution it is difficult to express a preference among them, other than the vague notion that "perhaps the challenge is to meet a basic need for balance and wholeness." Neither the "one size fits all" prosecutorial strategy, nor a uniform preference for amnesty or some non-juridical alternative in every case, would be justifiable. Circumstances differ, and circumstances matter. Atrocities, whether committed abroad or at home, are almost by definition highly unusual. For precisely that reason, their resolutions should be too. Ironically, perhaps, a court that is very similar to these from a legal point of view is likely to soon be established in Iraq. You make some good and thought-provoking points, but your language is not always as clear as it might be. Clarity is of supreme importance in law! Istvan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    a new negative image as uncontrolled delinquents who committed senseless crimes, only served to make the problem worse by marginalizing the smokers. (Becker 1963). Another labelling theorist who attempted to show how crimes have been 'created' was Kathleen Tierney, who studied wife-beating, and how the emergence and major growth of

  2. Describe the different aims of sentencing.

    This is because the offenders that are released with no punishment after committing an offence are usually not hardened criminals or are morally blameless. Therefore they are unlikely to want to get into that position again and receive another conviction.

  1. International Institutions and Human Rights. The three international institutions and their impact on ...

    The United States signed the Second Convention, which occurred in 1882. The second convention extended the protection of the first convention to wounded combatants at sea and shipwrecked sailors. The Third Geneva Convention was convened in 1929 and resulted in specific protections for prisoners of war.

  2. The European Court of Justice ensures that European law is applied throughout the member ...

    A reference must be made if the national courts are one from which there is no further appeal. In the United Kingdom, the Supreme Court must refer such questions, while the smaller courts usually have some discretion about whether or not to do so.

  1. The Death Penalty in Canada. There are many issues surrounding the rebirth of ...

    However, the cost of execution can be higher than the life sentence. It is estimated that a capital case resulting in execution costs $3-4 millionxv. The typical cost of keeping someone in prison for a life sentence is $30-35000 dollars annually.

  2. Demonstrate your understanding of both the UK civil and criminal court systems and their ...

    This is why the burden of proof is different. In civil court the plaintiff is required to prove his case "on the balance of probabilities". This means that the judge or jury believes that it is more likely than not that you were wronged.

  1. Free essay

    Critically discuss whether the criminal courts of England and Wales require substantial reform. Firstly ...

    court can accommodate all the business with which it may have to deal. The Court of Appeal deals with civil and criminal appeals in England and Wales. Criminal appeals include appeals against convictions in the Crown Court, and points of law referred by the legal representative following conviction in the Crown Court or where the sentence imposed was unjustifiably lenient.

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    been confirmed in having raped, dismembered, and killed five boys under the age of ten in a matter of weeks should receive the death penalty does not seem to be a hard decision to make. There should be no questions asked and no second thoughts about putting those kinds of people to death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work