• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss. The idea of parliamentary sovereignty is that Parliament (or strictly, the Queen in Parliament) can make or unmake any law on any subject whatever, without any legal restriction. This idea was generally accepted as reality a hundred years ago, or even fifty years ago, but there must now be some doubt as to its truth. Parliament is certainly restricted by the UK's membership of the European Union, and other international treaties such as the European Convention on Human Rights may also have put some limits on its freedom to legislate. Nevertheless, the powers of Parliament are undoubtedly considerable. An Act of Parliament can determine the succession to the Crown, for example, and the Act of Settlement 1700 (which is still in force) transferred the line of succession from James II to Princess Sophia and her Protestant descendants. Similarly, the Abdication Act 1936 recognised the abdication of Edward VIII in favour of his brother who became George VI. Parliament can also alter its own composition and powers, as it did by the Parliament Act 1911 (which removed the veto powers of the House of Lords) ...read more.

Middle

When a bill has been passed in identical terms in both Houses, it is presented for the royal assent, when Commissioners acting for the Queen indicate her approval of the proposal by the Norman French phrase "La Reyne le veult" (the Queen wishes it). If the Queen wished to signify disapproval, the tactful phrase would be "La Reyne s'avisera" (the Queen will consider it), but the royal assent has never been refused to any bill passed by both Houses since 1704 (when Queen Anne refused her assent to the Scottish Militia Bill), and most constitutional lawyers now believe that in any but the most extraordinary circumstances the sovereign is bound to assent. Without any doubt, the greatest limitations on Parliamentary sovereignty now arise from membership of the European Union. There is room for debate as to whether this is a good or a bad thing, and/or whether the advantages of membership outweigh the perceived disadvantage of lost sovereignty, but any sensible person must surely admit that Parliamentary sovereignty has been curtailed. There are three main ways in which this is evident. First, there is now an external body (or bodies, perhaps) ...read more.

Conclusion

Campbell & Fell v United Kingdom (1984) 7 EHRR 165, ECHR A number of prisoners involved in a prison riot were charged with disciplinary offences under the Prison Rules, and were sentenced by the Board of Visitors to a substantial loss of remission. No legal representation was permitted at the disciplinary hearing, and subsequent consultations with the prisoners' solicitors took place in the presence of a prison officer. The Court said this was in breach of Art.6, guaranteeing the right to a fair trial. The Government subsequently changed the Prison Rules to allow legal representation in cases where the prison authorities could impose a substantial loss of remission. A further limitation of Parliamentary sovereignty, some might say, is the use of referenda to decide major constitutional issues. The first national referendum in 1974 asked whether the United Kingdom should remain in the European Community, and the Labour Party have all but promised a referendum on the single currency within the next five years. (In between times, there have been devolution referendums in Wales and Scotland.) Although Parliament retains the right to decide when and on what issue a referendum is to be held, and could in theory ignore the result, the reality is that there is a temporary transfer of power from parliament to the populace at large Claire Spencer Page 1 10/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    Section 4 ingeniously empowers judges to openly express their loyalty to the values laid out in the Convention while simultaneously avoiding any covert undermining of Parliament's intentions (Loveland, 2003). Lord Irvine (2003) praised section 4(6) for expressly protecting Parliamentary sovereignty - Parliament is under no legal obligation to amend incompatible

  2. Av Dicey said that parliament can make or unmake any law on any subject ...

    The Court of Appeal and House of Lords held tat no national court had the power to suspend the operation of an Act of Parliament. The ECJ disagreed. The House of Lords thereupon granted an order restraining the Secretary of State from enforcing the legislation.

  1. Commercial law discussion - 'Transfer of Title by a Non-Owner'.

    In Shaw v Commissioner of Police (1987)4, a car had been obtained from the owner ob the basis that the person obtaining it might have a client who might be willing to buy it. It was held that he was not a buyer within the meaning of s25 and was

  2. There are a number of advantages and disadvantages for law making in the Westminster ...

    through the passing of bills between the House of Commons, House of Lords and finally the Royal Assent. Due to the complexity of English law this is not the only way in which law is created but is the main way.

  1. On the whole it is evident that the prevention of disease and health care ...

    Legislators and judges are now called to intervene in areas that were previously seen as the exclusive domain of medical science. Thus, medical law is also recognised as a subset of human rights law. But, given the novelty of the problems raised, conventional human rights law may not offer ready answers.

  2. It could be argued that the employment tribunal system is a breach of Article ...

    and public authorities but the ECHR has enforced a positive obligation on the state to ensure observance and enjoyment of the right without discrimination. There are numerous examples of case law which depicts Article 8 implications. In Niemitz v Germany5 deals with the right to privacy within the office; the

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    "educational supervision" and her treatment did not overstep Art. 3 threshold. Douglas and Lowe36 see this approach as very paternalistic and disappointing, indicating a long way towards recognition of autonomy rights. Indeed, even after UNCRC, it shows no improvement over Nielsen-type attitude, lacking in children's empowerment and posing a poor example for states37.

  2. As a way for the English government to ensure that it attempted to certify ...

    which brings us, to the same conclusion as Lord Irvine, stating that "the ultimate responsibility for compliance with the Convention must be Parliament's alone"4 If a breach of the convention occurs the court cannot interpret the provisions in a complex way (it would be against section 3)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work