• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law and Justice

Extracts from this document...


What is meant by justice? Consider to what extent the law promotes justice. In England and Wales, a defendant is prosecuted under the Criminal Justice system for a crime. This is the clearest example that English law is based around the concept of justice. Lord Denning wrote: "If people are to feel a sense of obligation to the law, then the law must correspond as near as may be, to justice." This principle is essential to any legal system: if it fails to serve the public in a fair, just and reasonable way, it will not be observed. But what does justice mean, and to what degree, and by what methods is justice endorsed and promoted by the law. One of the fundamental tenets in which scholars have examined the law and justice is the theory of Natural law, primarily examined by Aristotle and St Thomas Aquinas. The BC Greek philosopher Aristotle, proposed the meaning of justice to be a method of allowing people to fulfil themselves as members of society. This principle came in two parts: distributive justice, the mechanism by which assets such as wealth and honours were allocated amongst a community, and corrective justice, the principles by which the state should correct unfairness and restore equality. ...read more.


Finally, there are the Rules of Evidence, which state that evidence used in court must have been obtained through fair means. For example, in the case of R v Watts, the conviction based upon previous convictions used as evidence was quashed, as the Court of Appeal judge that their prejudicial effect outweighed their value as evidence. These procedural rules promote justice, because they ensure to a reasonable degree that the vital processes which lead to a conviction, or a confirmation of civil liability, are fair, and free from prejudice which might invalidate them, and lead to miscarriages of justice. If the process by which law is executed is unjust from the start, then the outcome will always be so. Substantive justice involves several subcategories of the law. Firstly, rectifying mistakes as any system of law will have errors and miscarriages of justice which must have a method of repeal. The Prosecution have the chance to appeal a judges ruling on a point of law during a trial, and the Defence can appeal against the verdict or sentence afterwards. The Attorney-General can appeal against an unduly lenient sentence, and miscarriages such as those of the Birmingham Six and Guilford Four let to the establishment of the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which prevents further unfairness. ...read more.


None of this was properly assessed in court, leading to his unanimous conviction. The CCRC is now asking the CPS to consider reviewing similar cases where DNA is now available, and the defendant is still alive. In conclusion, the law does not promote justice as much as it should do, due to failures in a few key areas, such as sentencing, and various factors leading to the recent surge in miscarriages of justice. It should still be noted however that the legal system is by and large a fair mechanism for the execution of justice, with the Human Rights Act 1998 ensuring that it follows the ECHR, and with organisations such as the Criminal Cases Review Commission working to find and highlighted miscarriages of justice. The problem comes from the fact that a perfect justice can never be obtained, and there will never be a case in which all parties feel they have been treated in truly fair manner. This is why there comes a point where the courts must make a decision and abide by it, whilst balancing the interests of all parties involved, to achieve the best justice they can. It is easy in hindsight to condemn the courts for miscarriages of justice, without considering the stress that outside influences, and certainly the media, place on hasty convictions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Christopher Reading A2 Law ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher


    4 star(s)

    This means that the development of the law is stagnated. Therefore the practise statement was a new guideline for judges as they could use the term "when right to do so". Also the cases such as Herrington, Miliangos v George Frank (Textiles)

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Critically discuss different possible meanings of justice and explore the relationship between law and ...

    3 star(s)

    But, in actual fact they should be obeyed, as not doing so would result in social disorders taking place. The theory of utilitarianism takes a look at society as a whole nation, not an individual.

  1. Sanctions available in criminal Law

    Other serious offences can also result in a life sentence. A life sentence doesn't necessarily mean life in jail, but if an offender is released the licence conditions last for the rest of their life. Similarly to a Indeterminate sentence, but a court instead of giving a definitive date the

  2. Juvenile Justice

    Serious violent crimes by juveniles are reported to law enforcement. This number has not changed significantly in 20 years. The rate at which juveniles committed serious violent crimes changed between 1973 and 1989, peaked in 1993, and by 1997 declined to the lowest level since 1986.this is because the effectiveness of the law, outlining justice ,equality and rights of individuals.

  1. Law a2 notes

    - Affects the usefulness or integrity of property Morphitis v Salmon; Samuels v Stubbs; R v Fiak - Cost/expense to repair A (a juvenile) - Time/effort to repair Hardman v CC of Avon & Somerset Constabulary - Matter of fact and degree Roe v Kingerlee Destroys: Destroys is a stronger

  2. Critically evaluate the partial defence of Provocation.

    An important but controversial qualification was laid down in R v Duffy (1949) namely that the loss of self-control must be 'sudden and temporary'. This was unlikely to be the case if the murder was committed for revenge, since 'the conscious formation of a desire for revenge means that a person has had time to think.'

  1. AS LAW - Judicial Precedent

    Operation of the Doctrine of Precedent 1. Every court is bound by a court above it in the hierarchy. 2. In general, appellate (appeal) courts are bound by their own private decisions. (But there are exceptions to this rule, especially for the House of Lords since the 1966 Practice Statement.)

  2. The Nature of Law in Society

    Legal positivism is a view of law as it is set rather than it ought to be. It implies that legal rules are valid not because they are rooted in moral or natural law, but because they are enacted legitimate authority and are accepted by the society as such.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work