• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Non-fatal Offences?

Extracts from this document...


How satisfactory is the current law on Non-fatal Offences? Non-fatal offences against the person are assault, battery, assault or battery occasioning actually bodily harm (ABH), malicious wounding and Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH) with intent. The first two offences are defined in the Criminal Justice Act 1988, with the remainder being found in the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA). There is a variety of sentences available ranging from imprisonment for six months to a life sentence for the most serious offence of GBH with intent (s.18 OAPA 1861). Moreover it could be argued that the current law on non fatal offences is not satisfactory and it is long over due for reform. Professor Horder of the Law Commission has stated that it is time to 'rethink non fatal offences against the person'. He has also argued that 'the desire for certainty and the fair labeling principle point to the need for greater distinctions between offences'. However to further this Henry LJ describes the current law as 'yet another example of how dreadful and appalling the present state of law is'.It is then no surprise that there are numerous calls for reform in this area. ...read more.


Thus when compared to the common assaults, it seems rather similar, does it not? Furthermore s47 has not yet been really explained as in certain cases such as Chan-f**k, Miller etc it just merely states what could amount to ABH but not how it could amount to ABH. This makes the law unclear as the judiciary does not know what they are looking for. Consequently s20 is defined as a more serious offence than s47; nevertheless they carry the same maximum penalty of five years, this is absurd, is it not? Therefore it could be argued that the boundary between assault, battery and ABH and s47 to s20 is too vague and again people may be treated unfairly. It is unjust that a person who causes a small cut can be charged with a more serious offence of s20 instead of s47. Hence the law on non fatal offences is not satisfactory and is seriously over due to be reformed. To further this, the only significant difference between s.20 and s.18 is arguably a slightly more serious mens rea, but this time the sentence leaps from five years to life imprisonment. ...read more.


This would enable more people to understand the current law and maybe might reduce the crime levels, as they might know what there actions could amount to. Under the Bill the structure has been severely revised. For example s.18 is replaced by 'intentionally causing serious injury' which will contain maxima of life, whereas s20 by 'recklessly causing injury' will contain maxima of 5 years. Additionally s47 will be by 'intention and or recklessness and will have a maximum of 2 years. By improving the structure and simplifying would make life a great deal better. This is because the current structure is too complicated. Nevertheless the term assault will still be used but for two separate offences of assault and battery. The aforementioned reforms should make the law clearer and classifying an offence should be less complicated. However one aspect which also should be considered is the idea of codification, joining all the offences and acts together as currently they are all disjointed. A new enactment should be created and established and this would contain everything associated with non fatal offences. It would fundamentally make the law easy, as all the aspects would be in one place. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A reasonably well structured essay which show some of the problems associated with the current non-fatal offences and discusses suggestions for reform. It could be improved by describing the offences and some of the problems more accurately. Rating ***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 18/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describing the Rules and Aids to Statute interpretation. Including Advantages and Disadvantages.

    4 star(s)

    Describe two of the rules of the statutory interpretation and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. There are three rules and two approaches judges can use when trying to interpret an Act. The most narrow rule where the Act is followed to the words is the Literal Rule.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Explain and Comment on the role of the Criminal Cases Review Commission.

    4 star(s)

    an appeal if it feels an investigation is likely to help the court resolve the appeal. The Commission's principle role is to review the convictions of those who believe they have either been wrongly found guilty of a criminal offence, or wrongly sentenced.

  1. Critically analyse the relationship between law and justice.

    disinterested people would unanimously choose to belong if such a choice were available. His theory was based upon a hypothesis of what a group of individuals placed in what he named "the original position" would agree upon. Rawls argues that traditional self interest would lead an individual to agree to

  2. 'Juries are anti-democratic, irrational and haphazard.' To what extent do you think that this ...

    Jurors may be easily convinced by the manner and presentation of the barristers during the trial, or be persuaded by a forceful or belligerent foreman when locked in the jury room. Then in some trials, for eg motoring offences, juries have a sympathy with the accused.

  1. The Bail Act 1976 gives a general right to bail, no matter how serious ...

    The advantages of bail for the defendant are that it allows them the right to remain free until the end of the trial period, which if they are innocent means they haven't had to endure any unwarranted jail time, and if they are guilty gives them that last few weeks,

  2. Why was the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) created?

    system, so with this the Crown prosecution service was divided into 31 areas so that each area covered one or two police areas under the control of the DPP. By 1987 there was four regional directors that had been appointed to help with the running of the 31 areas, however

  1. Describe the use of the Practice Statement using the sources and other cases. [15 ...

    that times had changed and people do eventually speak out about r**e and they needed to accommodate for this. Havana Railways 1968 had ruled that if you apply for compensation in a British court, you can only claim that compensation in the British currency.

  2. Explain the requirements of lawful arrest and detention

    Detention Legal Advice You as a detained person have the right for a free legal advice from duty solicitor. The request will be sent to the Defence Solicitor Call Centre and it will be analyse into serous and non-serious. Non-serious crime will be passing on to Criminal Defence Services Direct.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work