• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offer and Acceptance

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sheena Problem An offer is an expression of willingness to be bound by the terms of the offer once it is accepted. The offer may be made by words, in writing, conduct or a mixture of all three. An offer can be made to one person, a group of people or to the world at large, e.g. where a reward is offered for a lost item, this is normally made via an advertisement and this is seen as a unilateral offer, which is one sided (Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.). Sheena sees an advertisement in a window which states 'All mini disc players at � 10 to the first twenty customers on Monday morning'. Sheena wishing to accept this offer queued up all night on the Sunday and was customer number seven. Once entering the store and selecting the mini disc player, she is informed that the management has decided to end the promotion. Due to this offer being a unilateral offer, the communication of the revocation of the offer is inappropriate. The rule that revocation must be communicated was established in the case of Byrne v Van Tienhoven, where a telegraph was sent on the 11th October, but a letter withdrawing the offer was posted on the 8th October was only received on the 20th October. ...read more.

Middle

An example of a case which is similar to Sheena's is Fisher v Bell based on the display of goods with a price ticket attached. Where the defendant displayed a flick knife in his shop window. He was convicted of a criminal offence of offering knives for sale, but on an appeal, Lord Justice Parker stated that it was an "invitation to treat not offer", therefore the conviction was overturned contrary to the legislation. In this circumstance, the shoes Sheena wished to purchase are in fact an "invitation to treat", otherwise if it was a offer, then on taking them to the cash desk she would be accepting the offer, as Lord Justice Somervell stated in the Boots Case : "otherwise customers wouldn't be able to change their minds". In this case, Boots was charged with the offence concerning sale of certain medicines which could only be sold by a pharmacist, or under supervision of a qualified pharmacist. The issue was that when a customer picked the medicine up off a shelf, they were not being supervised and therefore was committing an offence. The Court of Appeal stated that the shelf display was not an actual offer but an invitation to treat and therefore the offer is made by the customer when being paid for at the cash desk, at this point it would be supervised by a pharmacist, therefore there was no offence. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore Sheena took the wallet back to Nick without being aware of the reward therefore she was not motivated by the offer and the existence of the offer had no effect on her returning of the lost wallet. Another case following along the same line as motive for acceptance is Williams v Carwardine (1833) where the person actually was aware of the reward but gave the information due to the motives of spite and revenge. Although she gave information for this, she was aware of the reward and therefore was entitled to the reward. In conclusion, Sheena was entitled to purchasing the mini disc player for � 10 due to her accepting the offer, the offer was never revoked as it must take place before acceptance and on queuing and entering the store, Sheena had accepted the offer. Not enough reasonable steps were taken to revoke the offer before acceptance. Sheena will only be able to purchase the shoes for � 25 if she offers a counter offer of � 25 and the cashier, Tom, accepts this, otherwise no contract will be made without an acceptance. Nick does not need to give Sheena the reward, although he may offer it her, he does not have to as she was unaware of the reward before returning it to him, and she returned this to him without a need for a motive. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    or to the world at large (general offer - unilateral offer) * Tender is an offer by conduct even if it contradicting Unsolicated Goods And Service Act 1991 Invitation To Treat (ITT) * ITT is an invites other party to enter into negotiations.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    The exclusion clause actually covered "any damage howsoever caused". By notice - This means that the presence of the clause is brought to the attention of the other party. Parker v South Eastern Railway Co (1877) 2 CPD 416. Reasonable notice of the existence of the clause must be given by the party seeking to rely upon it before or at the time the contract is made.

  1. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    a rejection of the original offer and be a counter offer as was held in the case of Hyde v. Wrench 1840, where a defendant offered to sell his farm to the plaintiff's for �1000, which the plaintiff responded to by offering to buy it for �950, which the defendant's

  2. ELEMENTS OF CONTRACT - OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE.

    requested Bob to remind him to buy him a drink, following Currie v Misa that some benefit moving to the promisor. On Wednesday Alan telephone Bob and leave a message this would amount to an acceptance provided if Alan's replied to the offer in an unqualified assent and it is communicated.

  1. Postal Acceptance Rule

    Even if it is possible to regard the post office as his agent to carry the letter (which still seems unreal, with a prepaid letter) there is surely no agency to receive it and so conclude a contract on its behalf, which is what would be needed to justify the rule".

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    The outcome of the case was that his claim failed, although he had seen the offer, it was not present in his mind when he acted. (Taken from Common Law 1 BPP.) Waiver of communication The offeror may, by his offer, dispense with the need for communication of acceptance.

  1. Contract law - Advise Sarah - The first thing to ascertain is whether the ...

    In Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.5, the defendants advertised that they would pay �100 to anyone who contracted influenza after using their smoke ball for a specified period, and that �1000 had been deposited in a bank as proof of their sincerity.

  2. Assess the problems that arise through terminating and offer

    Another method of termination that has problems is revocation, especially the communication side, because an offer can be revoked at any time up until that offer is accepted, but if the revocation is not communicated then the offer has not been revoked.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work