• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Sources of the English Legal System and the Relationship between Legislation and Judicial precedent.

Extracts from this document...


FC012 T2258212Khanum, F. Introduction. The present legal system of England and Wales has expanded over many centuries and has also changed regularly during this period. Modern difficulties and needs have led to widespread changes in the court system they include the coordination of the legal profession and the process followed by the courts (Ward and Akhtar, 2008). The English law consists of eight sources that include the Interpretation of Statues, Act of Parliament, Judicial precedent, Treaties, Equity, Custom, European law, and Delegated legislation. However, this essay will be discussing three sources of law, they include: Judicial precedent, Statutory Interpretation and Legislation . This essay will also discuss the relationship between the legislation and judicial precedent and the rules of the statutory interpretation. Sources of English Legal System. Firstly, the judicial precedent is also known as case law, common law or judge-made law. The judicial precedent also known as case law originates from the decisions made by judges in the cases before them (Elliott and Quinn, 2011). In making a decision concerning a case, there are two basic steps. The first step is verifying the facts (what happened) and secondly, how the applies to those facts. There are three requirements needed for judicial precedent. ...read more.


There are two contrary views with the way judges determine the meaning of a statute. They include; Literal and Purposive approach (Slapper & Kelly, 2010). The literal approach is dominant in the English legal system. This view of judicial interpretation is concerned about judges looking primarily to the words of the legislation so as to find out its meaning. They are not allowed to look beyond or behind the legislation in search of the meaning of the statute. On the other hand, the purposive approach tends to avoid restrictions of the judges? search for the meaning to a literal arrangement of words of the legislation itself. It suggests judges should be able to look outside the words of the statutes in search of the reason for its enactment and that meaning should be interpreted for the purpose so it can be effective (Slapper& Kelly, 2010). The three rules of interpretation are; Literal, Golden and Mischief rule. Firstly, the literal rule simply means courts giving their apparent, clear and ordinary meaning even if the significance is not meaningful (Huxley-Binns and Martin, 2008). This idea was expressed by Lord Esther in R v Judge of the city of London Court (1892) 1 QB 273.[2] An example of a case that made use of the literal rule is Whiteley v Chappell (1868) ...read more.


The principle of Hansard when interpreting a statute is what a minister has said about a piece of legislation so as to decide what the parliament has planned ( Elliott & Quinn 2011). Conclusion. This report has thoroughly discussed the relationship between the legislation and judicial precedent. It discussed parliamentary supremacy, separation of powers, rules of statutory interpretation and ambiguity of the language. It further discussed the rules of statutory interpretation and the two views which are literal and purposive approach. The rules are literal, golden and mischief rule. Finally, it discussed the aids of interpretation which includes Hansard (document of parliamentary debates). ________________ [1] It was held in the House of Lords. [2] If the words of an act are clear then you must abide by them even though they lead to a manifest absurdity. The court has nothing to do with the question whether the legislature has committed an absurdity. [3] Jervis said ?We must therefore, in this case have recourse to what is called the golden rule of construction, as applied to Acts of Parliament, viz, to give words used by the legislature their plan meaning useless it is seen from the common perspective and the purpose of the statute, injustice, and the result of absurdity.? [4] It was used in the case David v Johnson (1979). [5] It was settled in the House of Lords. [6] Benefit gotten from a job. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Using Cases to illustrate your points critically, decribe the Homocide Act 1957 and include ...

    the term "malice aforethought" has provided uncertainties therefore the House of Lords in R v Cunningham removed the uncertainties and mens rea in murder cases has come to mean an intention to kill or cause Grievous bodily harm (GBH). GBH means "really serious harm".

  2. Human Trafficking In Australia. This essay will be covering different aspect of human ...

    5 women from Thailand to work in her brothel under illegal conditions of slavery and debt bondages. Wei Tang was convicted in 2006 of 5 counts of intentionally possessing a slave on five counts of intentionally exercising a power of ownership over a slave, contrary to 270.3(1)(a)

  1. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    As a result of her refusal to accept a blood transfusion, the victim died of her wounds. The court of Appeal rejected the defendant's argument that her refusal broke the chain of causation, on the ground that the accused had to take the victim as he found her.

  2. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)

    at the beginning of trial but were unaware because they did not speak. It is impartial and not legally binding. The main advantages found in ADR are that it is generally faster and less expensive. It is based on more direct participation by the disputants, rather than being run by lawyers, judges, and the state.

  1. provocation essay

    Byrne was a s****l psychopath who killed and mutilated a girl's body because he could not control his s****l urges and was allowed the defence. Depression arises as an internal source. As Carl has been off work with depression he may have this evidence but he must be better now

  2. Describe the role of the House of Commons, The House of Lords and The ...

    So overall the main role of the House of Commons is to propose, draft and scrutinise the points of the bill. Next the bill is passed to the House of Lords where they will hold a first and second reading, basically outlining and discussing the bill- much like the House of Commons did.

  1. Free essay

    police powers

    The officers are obliged to provide a form explaining the reason for the stop and giving contact information. Arrest - Comes under section 24 and code G of PACE which sets out general powers of arrest, some of these powers can be used by private citizens as well as the police.

  2. Critically discuss the Labour Governments record of crime control since coming to power in ...

    It was borne out of dissatisfaction with the comprehensiveness of statistics compiled from police records. Criminal Statistics, whilst producing a correct broad pattern of crime, nevertheless had anomalies, most notably shown by Farrington and Dowds in their study of Nottinghamshire study in 1985.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work