• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Statutory interpretation.

Extracts from this document...


Statutory interpretation WHITLEY v CHAPPEL [1868]: a statute aimed at preventing electoral malpractice made it an offence to impersonate any person entitled to vote at an election. The accused was acquitted because he impersonated a dead person and the dead person was not entitled to vote. L&NE RAILWAYS CO v BERRIMAN [1946]: a railway worker was knocked down and killed by a train, and his widow attempted to claim damages. The relevant statute provided that this was available to employees killed while engaging in relaying or repairing tracks. And since the dead man had been doing routine maintenance and oiling, which the court held did not come within the meaning o relaying and repairing so the widow could not claim damages. FISHER v BELL [1961]: after several violent incidents in which the weapon used was a flick-knife, parliament decided that these knives should be banned. ...read more.


It was pointed out that it was impossible for a person already marries to marry someone else - they might go through the marriage ceremony, but would not actually be married. Using the literal rule it would make the statute be interpreted to mean shall go through a marriage ceremony. MADDOX v STORER [1963]: under the road traffic act 1960, it was an offence to drive at more that 30mph in a vehicle adapted to carry more than seven passengers. The vehicle in the case was a minibus made to carry seven passengers, rather than altered to do so, and the court held that adapted to could be taken to mean suitable for. SMITH v HUGHES [1960]: the street offences act 1958 made it a criminal offence for a prostitute to solicit potential customers in a street or public place. ...read more.


ROYAL COLLEGE OF NURSING v DHSS [1981]: the 1967 abortion act stated that termination of pregnancy was legal only if performed by a registered medical practitioner. By 1972, surgical abortions were largely being replaced by drug induced ones, in which the second stage of the process was carried out by nurses, under the instructions of a doctor. The House of Lords ruled that the mischief, which the act sought to remedy, was the uncertain state of the previous law, which drove many women to dangerous back-street abortionists. It sought to do this by widening the grounds in which abortions could be obtained, and ensuring that there were carried out with proper skill in hygienic conditions and the procedure in question promoted this aim, and was not unlawful. It was a controversial with Lords Wilberforce and Edmund Davies claiming that the House was not interpreting legislation but rewriting it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Statutory interpretation

    Then in (Pepper v Hart, 1993), judges allowed the use of Hansard but restricted it. The restrictions meant that Hansard could only be used if the meaning of an act was unclear and that a judge could only look at the parts where the minister for the relevant bill had spoken.

  2. Statutory Interpretation

    Sometimes the court does not identify which rule it is applying. The presumptions may be criticised similarly. For instance, there is no rule about which presumption should be applied where two of them conflict. Some of the limitations on the use of extraneous material restrictive.

  1. Statutory Interpretation

    This has two applications. In it's narrow sense it states that if the words of the statute are ambiguous, then the court should adopt the interpretation, which avoids an absurd result. In R v Allen (1872), the Offenses Against Persons Act 1981 made it an offense to "marry" whilst one's original spouse was still alive.

  2. Statutory Interpretation

    understand such statements and their effect * The statements relied on are clear There are three rules of Statutory Interpretation: Literal, Golden and Mischief. Literal rule * Gives all the words their ordinary and literal meaning * Popular in the 19th century * In 1969 the law commission said it

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work