• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Nature of Law in Society

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The nature of Law in Society Law is the binding rules of conduct meant to enforce justice and prescribe duty or obligation, and derived largely from custom or formal enactment by a ruler or legislature.These rules were put in place as a means of achieving social order in a wide variety of different spheres. These laws carry with them the power and authority of the en-actor, and associated penalties for failure or refusal to obey. Many people would argue that it pervades a lot of area's of human activity.  Law derives its legitimacy ultimately from universally accepted principles such as the essential justness of the rules, or the sovereign power of a parliament to enact them. It's basic purpose would be to provide a frame work of rules within which citizens co-exist in order to keep peace amongst themselves.  Law was described by Sir John Salmond as �the body of principles recognised and applied by the state in the administration of justice�. In this day and age the whole fabric of society relies on a reliable system of law, where people who suffer injustice in various forms can obtain remedies. There are some countries that do not have the benefit of a reliable system of law, this in effect has a number of consequences: people are not willing to invest in that economy; crime in various forms proliferates and the country will then suffer an inevitable high crime rate and also a big problem with poverty and depravation. Having a reliable system of law is important because it provides a fair trail for the person that is in question, in criminal law the most important principle of the law is that a person is innocent until proven guilty, so the standard of proof must be beyond reasonable doubt before a court of law can come to a conclusion. When the defendant is found guilty of a crime he/she will be  given a punishment that will reflect upon the seriousness of the case. ...read more.

Middle

Report supported Professor Hart�s view that law and morality should be separate, however, various cases decided since the report show that judges are imposing their moral views in their judgements, such as in the case of R v Brown (1994), the defendants had willingly consented to sado-masochistic practices, and none of them had complained to the police. Nevertheless, they were prosecuted, and convictions were upheld based on public policy to defend the morality of society. The law is therefore seen to attempt to uphold what it considers to be public morality, even if some may dispute the correctness of that moral code.This is a contrast to the case of R v Wilson (1996), At her request D branded his initials on his wife�s b******s with a hot knife. The scars led to him being charged with ABH and  held his conduct amounted to �tattooing� and that it was not in the public interest to impose a criminal sanction, still showing that the public and their moral views still influence our law. The differing approaches in these cases clearly show that judges are letting their own moral values affect their judgements.The courts often find themselves at the centre of hugely difficult moral decisions involving life and death. They are often forced to decide between individual rights and moral codes. In the case of Shaw v DPP [1962] Shaw published a 'ladies directory' which listed contact details of prostitutes, the services they offered and n**e pictures. Which he was then going to sell to the public for a fee.  He was convicted of conspiracy to corrupt public morals, living on the earnings of prostitution and an offence under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. The appellant appealed on the grounds that no such offence of conspiracy to corrupt public morals existed. The appeal was dismissed. The House of Lords in effect created a new crime. Lord Reid said "Even if there is still a vestigial power of this kind it ought not, in my view, to be ...read more.

Conclusion

where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. 2) Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. 3) Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: (a)to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; (b)to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence; (c)to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require; (d)to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; (e)to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court. To conclude, in order for us to understand the true nature of law in society, we must fully develop our understanding of where the current societies moral standing is. In essence a law that was deemed a right decison in a case that was decided years ago does not make it right in the current time. For example the case of marital r**e would have been thought to be a very easy decion as the people in those times believed that as soon as the female partner had given consent to marry the male she had automatically submitted herself to s****l acts with her partner weather she wanted them or not. However in this day and age this law has been deemed wrong and has been changed and the law of marital r**e had been put in place to reflect the change in socieites moral views. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically discuss different possible meanings of justice and explore the relationship between law and ...

    3 star(s)

    This then leads to an unfair trial which is not consistent and adherent to the rules. However, if a solicitor was present at the time, and there were recordings of the activities which took place during the room, it would be explicit as to whether bribery was taking place, if so, defendant can be prosecuted.

  2. Examine the relationship between law and morals and consider whether the law should support ...

    It will consistently change with time, to reflect a change in attitudes, and the law must attempt to stay abreast of the situation. An example of this can be seen in R v R , which changed the law, so that r**e within marriage became a crime.

  1. Explain the distinction between the law and morals and consider the importance of the ...

    Therefore a question of when vigorous s****l activity becomes sadomasochism must be raised as there is no clear distinction between the two different situations. It must again be remembered that in Slingsby the defendant was acquitted of the offence even though his wife had actually died as a result of the injuries she sustained.

  2. Discuss the nature of legal and moral issues. Consider whether the law does and ...

    We as a whole live in a pluralistic society so it is difficult for the law to reflect differing morals. Therefore, coincide of law and morals may be partial. For example, many people believe that homosexuality is immortal, so law and morality do not entirely coincide here.

  1. Understanding Young People, Law and Order

    If the defendant pleads guilty, the judge will decide an appropriate sentence. Criminal trials usually take place in open court - which means that members of the press and public are allowed to hear proceedings. If a defendant pleads 'not guilty', the prosecution and defence form opposing sides.

  2. Juvenile Justice

    the rights of special protection and care afforded to the young, including their right of biological parents, human identity as well as the basic needs for food, education, health care and criminal laws appropriate for the age and progress of the child.

  1. Critically evaluate the partial defence of Provocation.

    She taunted him at his failure and kicked him in the genitals. He responded by stabbing her, as a result of which she died. The trial judge directed the jurors that in applying the objective test they were only to consider what effect the woman's provocation would have on a

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    A number of offences have been prosecuted involving the abuse of investigatory power. A major example is the News of the World scandal. One example of hacking was the phone hacking of Millie Dowler which created public outrage. Mille Dowler was a thirteen year old girl who was abducted in March 2002 and subsequently murdered.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work