• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this coursework, I am going to solve equations by using the Numerical Methods. Numerical methods are used to solve equation that cannot be solved algebraically

Extracts from this document...



Pure mathematic 2 coursework


In this coursework, I am going to solve equations by using the Numerical Methods. Numerical methods are used to solve equation that cannot be solved algebraically e.g. quadratic equations ax²+bx+c=0 can be solved using this formula:

x= -b± √ b² - 4ac


Therefore numerical methods would not be used for quadratic equations. I will be working with equation which don’t have a formula to solve it. There are three methods, which I will be using:

· Change of sign method

· Newton-Raphson method

· Rearranging f(x) = 0 in the form x = g(x)


Our object is to investigate the solution of equations using the three different methods.  To solve an equation we must find all its roots; a method which misses one or more roots will fail to solve the equation.

Change of sign method:

There are three ways in which we can do this method which are:

  • Decimal searcher
  • Interval bisection
  • Linear interpolation


This method works when a function crosses the x-axis. If we are looking for the root of the equation f(x) = 0. The point at which the curve crosses x-axis is the root. Once an interval where f(x) changes sign then the root must be in the interval.                                      

...read more.



















From this we know that the root lie between -1.51 and -1.50, so now we will zoom between -1.51 and -1.50 to see where the root lies. The table below shows calculation for 3 decimal place.



































Now we can state that the root lies between -1.502 and -1.501, the calculation now would be from

-1.502 to -1.501. The table below shows value for x to 4 decimal place.  





























From the table above we can state that the root lie between {-1.5018 <x< -1.5017}, now we can do more calculation and get even more precise answer but we don’t know what is the precise accurate answer, the answer may be to 5 or even 10 decimal places. So it can take along time to find an accurate answer.

Root lies {-1.5018,-1.5017}

We can express this information as:

  • The root can be taken as -1.50175 with a maximum error of  +/-0.00005image13.png
  • The root can be -1.50 to (2 decimal place)

Error bounds:

...read more.


When decimal search method works:


I will try solving: F(x) =

The reason why I choose this equation is because I need to prove that this method work and not only it has only few roots but it is very easy to differentiate this function. Figure 4 shows the graph of the function above. Figure 5 shows zoom in version of the graph.


Figure 4


Figure 5

As you can see there are three roots in this graph, they are in the interval, [-3,-2],

[-1, 0], [2, 3]

The gradient for the tangent to the curve at (x1, f(x1)) is f’(x1) (meaning dy/dx for x). The equation of the tangent is: y-y1 = m(x-x1). Therefore y-f(x1) = f’(x1) [x-x1]. This tangent passes through the point (x2, 0). Carrying on with this process, this will get closer and closer to the tangent. But there is a general formula for this process:

xn+1 = xn – {f(Xn)/f ’(Xn)}


Differentiating the function:

dy/dx = f’(x) = [1/7]*7 x7-1- [5*3]x3-1 + [5*2]x2-1- 5*0

               = x6-15x2+10x

So now, using the Newton-Raphson iteration equation we can find the roots

Root A= interval [-1, 0]

Root B= interval [-3, -2]

Root C= interval [2, 3]

Root A


Figure 6

Figure 6 shows the curve with a tangent, so xn=-1

figure 7 shows zoom-in version of figure 6.  

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    After 19 iterations, I found the root of the equation as from then on, it repeats. So the root of the equation x=G(x) against y = x graph. Failure of Rearrangement method There are situations where this method doesn't work.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    4 128 4.01 128.962402 96.4806 4 128 4.001 128.096024 96.04801 3 54 3.1 59.582 57.66 3 54 3.01 54.541802 54.3606 3 54 3.001 54.054018 54.03601 2 16 2.1 18.522 26.46 2 16 2.01 16.241202 24.2406 2 16 2.001 16.024012 24.02401 1 2 1.1 2.662 7.26 1 2 1.01 2.060602 6.1206

  1. MEI numerical Methods

    If it's positive we replace it with the upper bound. I will make a spreadsheet with a formula that satisfies this method and I will perform multiple iterations until my answer reaches 9 significant figures. A spreadsheet can be created for this method hence this method can be used to solve the equation.

  2. Numerical solutions of equations

    x6 = 0.680769 x7 = 0.680769 I can see a definite convergence from x6. So the root is x = 0.680769 which is similar to what I obtained when finding the same root using the Rearrangement method and the Decimal Search method.

  1. Mathematical equations can be solved in many ways; however some equations cannot be solved ...

    =0 where f(x) =. The graph of y=f(x) is shown below. ==> ==> ==> ==> By starting with the value of -3 we are now able to start finding the root in [-3,-2]. The iterations are shown below: ==> =-3.301927 The initial estimate for the root was -3.

  2. C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

    Failure Case Example: y= (0.5x³+1.5x²–x–0.25) 1/3 Reason cause to failure is that the graph crosses the x axis with a very steep gradient Graph is y=f(x) The steep crossing points were caused by the power 1/3 On the graph, the Newton Raphson method will fail to reach a root y= (0.5x³+1.5x²–x–0.25)

  1. Solving Equations Using Numerical Methods

    The second step was to move closer by entering into Excel by entering -3.5 to -3.4 (in 0.01?s) with the same formula in the next column. This gave me the answer as to where the change of sign was ? between -3.5 and -3.49.

  2. Evaluating Three Methods of Solving Equations.

    This method like the rest, does not work for every situation. Take the equation 0 = 5x3+x-1 which rearranges to x = 1-5x3. As you can see, after every iteration, the x-value diverges away from the root. This is because of the gradient at the root.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work