• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Numerical Solutions of Equations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

P2 Maths Coursework

Numerical Solutions of Equations                Page  of

P2 Maths Coursework

Numerical Solutions of Equations

## Introduction

The aim of this coursework is to compare three different numerical methods of solving equations. This will allow us to determine which one is the most efficient, quickest and easiest method to use.

The three methods I will use are:

• Decimal Search method
• Newton-Raphson method
• Rearranging method

Decimal Search

The decimal search is named as it employs the tactic of splitting the current interval of x values into 10 equal intervals of equal size and looking for a change of sign.

This process is then repeated, again splitting the current interval into 10 equal intervals of equal size and this can be continued until the root has been found to the required degree of accuracy.

The equation that I have chosen to solve is y = x5 – 2.7x + 1.8

It is illustrated by the graph below.   This is the same equation but has been zoomed in.

y = x5 – 2.7x + 1.8   y = x5 – 2.7x + 1.8 crosses the x-axis between  x = -2 and x = -1. To find the smallest root, I will take x = -4 as my starting value, and see the number of iterations required to find the root.

 x Y=x^5-2.7x+1.8 -1 3.5 -1.1 3.15949 -1.2 2.55168 -1.3 1.59707 -1.4 0.20176 -1.5 -1.74375 -1.6 -4.36576 -1.7 -7.80857 -1.8 -12.23568 -1.9 -17.83099 -2 -24.8 x Y=x^5-2.7x+1.8 -1.4 0.20176 -1.41 0.03391633 -1.42 -0.139533923 -1.43 -0.318710894 -1.44 -0.503736422 -1.45 -0.694734062 -1.46 -0.891829098 -1.47 -1.095148551 -1.48 -1.304821197 -1.49 -1.520977575 -1.5 -1.74375

 x Y=x^5-2.7x+1.8 -1.411 0.01682557 -1.4111 0.015113406 -1.4112 0.013400679 -1.4113 0.011687391 -1.4114 0.009973541 -1.4115 0.008259128 -1.4116 0.006544153 -1.4117 0.004828615 -1.4118 0.003112515 -1.4119 0.001395852 -1.412 -0.000321374
 x Y=x^5-2.7x+1.8 -1.41 0.03391633 -1.411 0.01682557 -1.412 -0.000321374 -1.413 -0.017524621 -1.414 -0.034784292 -1.415 -0.052100505 -1.416 -0.069473381 -1.417 -0.086903041 -1.418 -0.104389604 -1.419 -0.121933191 -1.42 -0.139533923 x Y=x^5-2.7x+1.8 -1.4119 0.001395852 -1.41191 0.001224155 -1.41192 0.001052452 -1.41193 0.000880743 -1.41194 0.000709029 -1.41195 0.000537309 -1.41196 0.000365584 -1.41197 0.000193853 -1.41198 2.21161E-05 -1.41199 -0.000149626 -1.412 -0.000321374

Middle In this case the function touches the x-axis but doesn't cross it, so no change of sign exists; hence we can’t use this method to calculate an estimate of the root

 x y = x3 + 5x2 + x + 0.051 0.1 0.202 0.11 0.222831 0.12 0.244728 0.13 0.267697 0.14 0.291744 0.15 0.316875 0.16 0.343096 0.17 0.370413 0.18 0.398832 0.19 0.428359 0.2 0.459

Newton Raphson Method

This method involves fixed-point estimation, whereby a tangent to the curve from an initial value of x is drawn then it is calculated where the tangent intercepts the x-axis. This gives the next approximation to the root.  Repeating the process gives more and more accurate values for the root.

Newton-Raphson formula is:

f(x) = x³-13x+14 Using the Newton-Raphson method, I will choose a starting point (x1) of positive 3 and will draw a tangent to the line at this point on the x-axis – where x = 3.  Where the tangent cuts the x-axis, I will have as my x2, my second point.  I will draw a new tangent here and continue the process.  I will illustrate this root graphically, but the other two purely numerically.  I need to differentiate this equation, in order to use this method as the Newton-Raphson formula is as follows.

Differentiate the equation    f’(x) = 3x²-13.

x2= 3 – 3³- (13*3)+14

(3*3²)-13

x2= 3 -  2

14

x2= 2.85714

By using this same method, but shortened significantly by using the ANS button on my calculator, I will find x3,, x4 etc

x3 = 2.84423

x4 = 2.84181

x5 = 2.84134

x6 = 2.84125

x7 = 2.84123

x8 = 2.84122

x9 = 2.84122

Conclusion

Newton-Raphson was the quickest of the three numerical methods.  Newton-Raphson took only four steps and fixed point iteration took six steps to converge to the required root.  The use of Microsoft Excel did not make a huge difference because a scientific calculator can easily be programmed with the required iterative formulae.  A few presses of the ‘equals’ button would converge to the required root.

The most likely problem with Newton-Raphson was finding the wrong root if the tangent diverges away from the required root. Decimal search also had a problem by not showing a change of sign in the first set of calculations when the root had two decimal places.

The Rearrangement method takes a lot of time to find the right arrangement of an equation, because not all g(x) graphs will allow convergence to the required root. Graphamatica was a very useful piece of software as it could be used to instantly visualise curves and gradient functions.  This meant that within seconds I could produce an accurate curve instead of having to make some calculations and draw the curve myself. This saved a lot of time as I could easily pick appropriate starting values without having to waste time using trial and error to pick my starting value.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

1.  ## C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

5 star(s)

From my graph, I can see that my X0 will be -2. To work out X1 I will use the formula above to work out X1 in steps and will repeat it to find a root to 5d.p and summarise in a table: Here are the results from the Iterations:

2.  5 star(s)

64 3 81 162 216 4 256 512 512 After looking through each value, I have observed a pattern. I have noticed that the gradient is always equal to 8x�. I predict that when x = 5, the gradient will be equal to 1000.

1. ## MEI numerical Methods

So far we've only seen K as an integer, how about when it isn't an integer, what will the correlation now be, here's a table with values of K when it isn't an integer. Value of K Roots of equation to 8 D.P -1/4 -1.469922111 -1/3 -1.434734764 -1/2 -1.362208742 1/2

2. ## Numerical solutions of equations

I can see from the graph that two roots need to be found using this method. The graph of this is below (or see Figure 3). The iterative formula for the "Newton-Raphson" method is: xn+1=xn- f(xn) f'(xn) For my equation, f'(xn)

1. ## Mathematical equations can be solved in many ways; however some equations cannot be solved ...

� It allows us to find the intervals of the values very easily. � It has the greatest possibility of failing.

2. ## In my coursework I will be using three equations to investigate their solutions using ...

Newton-Raphson equation x0 -2 x1 -1 x2 -0.8 x3 -0.765217391 x4 -0.76393381 x5 -0.763932023 x6 -0.763932023 x7 -0.763932023 This is fixed point iteration .

1. ## C3 Numerical Solutions to Equations

crosses the x axis at x1, the second guess. This gives the iterative formula xn+1=xn-f(xn)/f'(xn) This method will be used to find the roots of the equation f(x)=-x�+3x�+5x-3=0 Taking -2 as the first guess, the following results are obtained: Therefore x=-1.53407020 � 0.000000005 To confirm this root there must be a change of sign.

2. ## Solving Equations. Three numerical methods are discussed in this investigation. There are advantages and ...

f'(xn) f(xn)/f'(xn) xn+1 1 1 =B2^3+3*B2^2+0.5*B2-2 3x2+6x+0.5 =3*B2^2+6*B2+0.5 =C2/E2 =B2-F2 2 =G2 =B3^3+3*B3^2+0.5*B3-2 3x2+6x+0.5 =3*B3^2+6*B3+0.5 =C3/E3 =B3-F3 3 =G3 =B4^3+3*B4^2+0.5*B4-2 3x2+6x+0.5 =3*B4^2+6*B4+0.5 =C4/E4 =B4-F4 4 =G4 =B5^3+3*B5^2+0.5*B5-2 3x2+6x+0.5 =3*B5^2+6*B5+0.5 =C5/E5 =B5-F5 5 =G5 =B6^3+3*B6^2+0.5*B6-2 3x2+6x+0.5 =3*B6^2+6*B6+0.5 =C6/E6 =B6-F6 6 =G6 =B7^3+3*B7^2+0.5*B7-2 3x2+6x+0.5 =3*B7^2+6*B7+0.5 =C7/E7 =B7-F7 n - number of • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 