• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# This coursework is about finding the roots of equations by numerical methods.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

C3 Coursework - Numerical Solution to Equations

This coursework is about finding the roots of equations by numerical methods.

I am going to use three different methods to solve different equations. First of all, one root should be found successfully by using three different methods. Then, error bounds should be given and shown by graphic. A failure example is given and explained.

Change of Sign Method

I need to use an equation and use Autograph to get a rough interval and do a search to find intervals that show a change of sign.

Here is an example x³–2x²–3x+4=0 Solve x³–2x²–3x+4=0

Here is the table of values

 x -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 F(x) -38 -6 4 4 0 -2 4 24

This shows that there are three intervals containing roots:

(-2, -1), [1,2] and (2, 3)

Then carry out a decimal search in one of the identified intervals to find that root to the desired level of accuracy.

I use the interval (2, 3)

 x f(x) 2 -2 2.1 -1.859 2.2 -1.632 2.3 -1.313 2.4 -0.896 2.5 -0.375 2.6 0.256 2.7 1.003

The change in sign tells us there is a root in the range (2.5, 2.6)

Now use decimal search and Excel within the interval [2.5, 2.6]

 x f(x) 2.51 -0.31695 2.52 -0.25779 2.53 -0.19752 2.54 -0.13614 2.55 -0.07363 2.56 -0.00998 2.57 0.054793 2.58 0.120712

Middle

2.56150

-0.00034

2.56151

-0.00028

2.56152

-0.00021

2.56153

-0.00015

2.56154

-8.2E-05

2.56155

-1.8E-05

2.56156

4.63E-05  This graph shows us how the root is finally trapped in the range (2.56155, 2.56156)

What can cause failure?

One reason that the decimal search can fail is that there are several roots very close together in the same integer range.

For example, the equation y=54x³−225x²+309x−140  x y x y x y x y 1 -2 1.61 -0.37533 1.661 -0.04956 1.6661 -0.00509 1.1 -0.476 1.62 -0.32749 1.662 -0.04103 1.6662 -0.00419 1.2 0.112 1.63 -0.27216 1.663 -0.0324 1.6663 -0.00329 1.3 0.088 1.64 -0.20902 1.664 -0.02368 1.6664 -0.0024 1.4 -0.224 1.65 -0.13775 1.665 -0.01488 1.6665 -0.0015 1.5 -0.5 1.66 -0.05802 1.666 -0.00598 1.6666 -0.0006 1.6 -0.416 1.67 0.030502 1.667 0.003005 1.6667 0.0003 1.7 0.352

There appears to be only one root in the interval (1, 2) but there are three.

After finding the first root we might miss the other two.

There are three roots close together.

We only get one change of sign when we do the integer search.

The search will find the first root 1.6666 in this interval
Unless we have drawn a graph there is a big danger we may miss the other two roots.

Newton Raphson

An example is given: y=x³−2x²+1 We can see there are roots in the intervals [-1, 0] and [1, 2]

We will find the root in the interval [-1, 0] Xn+1= Xn–f(Xn)/f’(Xn)

If f(X)= x³−2x²+1    then   f’(x)= 3x²-4x

Xn+1= Xn–( Xn ³−2 Xn ²+1)/ (3 Xn ²-4 Xn)

Using our example : y=x³−2x²+1

To find the root in the interval [-1, 0] we can take x1 =-1 or x1 = 0

I will use x1 = -1

 x y -1 -0.71429 -0.71429 -0.62658 -0.62658 -0.61811 -0.61811 -0.61803 -0.61803 -0.61803

Can see that root is near to -0.6180 to 4 sf

Using Newton Raphson and Autograph Solver to find the root in the interval [-1, 0]  Solution: x=-0.61803399, y=0  Then find the root in the interval [1, 2]

To find the root in the interval [-1, 0] we can take x1 =1 or x1 = 2

I will use x1 = 2

 x y 2 1.75 1.75 1.642857 1.642857 1.619207 1.619207 1.618037 1.618037 1.618034 1.618034 1.618034

Can see that root is near to 1.6180 to 5 sf

 x y 1 1

Conclusion

(-0, 1)

To find the root in the interval (0, 1)

Decimal search

 X y 1 -1 0.9 -0.097 0.8 0.624 0.89 -0.01701 0.88 0.061184 0.889 -0.00911 0.888 -0.00123 0.887 0.006639 0.8879 -0.00044 0.8878 0.000349 0.88789 -0.00036 0.88788 -0.00028 0.88787 -0.0002 0.88786 -0.00012 0.88785 -4.4E-05 0.88784 3.42E-05

The root is0.8878 to 4 s.f.

Newton-Raphson

• To find the root in the interval [0, 1] we can take x1 =0 or x1 =1

I will use x1 = 1

xn+1= xn - (3xn^3+xn^2-xn-2)/(9xn^2+2xn-1)

 x y 1 0.9 0.9 0.88801 0.88801 0.887844 0.887844 0.887844

Can see that root is near to 0.8878 to 4 sf

x = g(x)

Take x1 = 1

Roots are given by −3x³−x²+x+2=0

Rearranges to:

3x³= −x²+x+2

x³ = 1/3(−x²+x+2)

x= [1/3(−x²+x+2)]1/3

• Iteration is Xn +1 = [1/3(−Xn ²+ Xn +2)]1/3

Using our example and finding the root in the interval [0, 1] , using X1=1

 x y 0.0000 0.8736 0.8736 0.8736

Can see that root is near to 0.8736 to 4 sf

Each method achieved the same accuracy in:

16 calculations for change of sign

4 calculations for Newton Raphson

1 calculation for x = g(x)

The x=g(x) method was the fast one in this particular example

Change of sign was much slower than NR and x=g(x)

If I only had a scientific calculator – the change of sign method is easier to operate.

If I also have Excel - the x=g(x) method is easier because there was only one calculation.

If I also have Autograph – the x=g(x) method is easier because there was only one calculation..

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

1.  ## C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

5 star(s)

The equation that I will use is y = x5 + 6x2 - x + 4 Rearrangement method I am using the same equation I used for my Re-arrangement above so the results will be exactly the same. So using the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that

2. ## MEI numerical Methods

multiple formulas in order to satisfy the methods, for more information on the formulas read the sections below where it deeply talks about them and how they were created. Solution to the problem: Method of bisection: To use the method of bisection, we must rearrange the equation so it = 0.

1. ## Solving Equations. Three numerical methods are discussed in this investigation. There are advantages and ...

- Output of the function when x=b - The mid point of a and b - Output of the function when x=c - Possible error can occur in the result. n a f(a) b f(b) C f(c) error 1 0 2 2 -2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2

2. ## Numerical solution of equations, Interval bisection---change of sign methods, Fixed point iteration ---the Newton-Raphson ...

First of all, for one root of f(x) = 0. We then can draw a tangent to the curve y=f(x) at the point (x1, f(x1)). The point which the tangent cuts the x axis gives the next approximation for the root.

1. ## I am going to solve equations by using three different numerical methods in this ...

0.001858218 1.27002 0.000648492 1.269531 1.27002 -0.000566192 0.000648492 1.269775 4.17701E-05 1.269531 1.269775 -0.000566192 4.17701E-05 1.269653 -0.000262056 1.269653 1.269775 -0.000262056 4.17701E-05 1.269714 -0.000110104 1.269714 1.269775 -0.000110104 4.17701E-05 1.269745 -3.41573E-05 1.269745 1.269775 -3.41573E-05 4.17701E-05 1.26976 3.80883E-06 1.269745 1.26976 -3.41573E-05 3.80883E-06 1.269753 -1.51736E-05 1.269753 1.26976 -1.51736E-05 3.80883E-06 1.269756 -5.68226E-06 1.269756 1.26976 -5.68226E-06 3.80883E-06 1.269758

2. ## OCR MEI C3 Coursework - Numerical Methods

found 1.00000 0.00000 The value diverges, despite the starting value being close to the root. This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown below: Fixed point iteration with x=g(x) Finding a root f(x)=x5-4x+3 The graph of y=f(x): We shall rearrange the equation into the form x=g(x)

1. ## Numerical Methods coursework

* There is a connection between the Trapezium Rule and the Midpoint Rule which can be used to shorten calculations: * Quick calculation of using and * All three rules simplify the working out on the spreadsheet due to less difficult formulae Formula Application I used the programme "Microsoft Excel 2003" to produce the spreadsheet.

2. ## Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

In addition this also proves that the mid-point rule is a second order polynomial. However, we should note that the mid-point rule is only an overestimate when the curve is convex. This is also the case for the curve On the other hand, the trapezium rule is an underestimate and • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 