Film Studies 28 Days Later How are the mise-en-scene, lighting, performance and camera work used to create meanings for the spectator in this early sequence?

Authors Avatar

Film Studies – “28 Days Later”

How are the mise-en-scene, lighting, performance and camera work used to create meanings for the spectator in this early sequence?

This analysis of '28 Days Later' will consider how the mise-en-scene, lighting, performance and camera work are combined to convey meaning and mood in the first few sequences of the film. This is a British post apocalyptic/horror/science fiction movie, directed by Danny Boyle the plot tells the story of a young man, Jim, who awakens from an apparently long coma in a deserted hospital in London. Throughout the course of the film we become aware that whilst he was sleeping, a highly contagious virus has swept through Britain. Turning its victims to insanity within a number of seconds, their blood begins to fume, their eyes turn deep bloodshot red and all that remains is a zombie like state of mind with the lust to massacre the uninfected.

Throughout the course of the film Jim becomes a reluctant hero who helps other survivors try to stay alive in the bleak situation.

The first scene that I examined starts immediately with clips of human wars, riots and violence around the world, which we later learn to be a vital theme in the film. The next shot is of a chimp, strapped to a chair and forced to watch these multiple sights of aggression. The mise-en-scene use of the TV screens is interesting as the camera shot appears tilted, to show “a world gone wrong” A high angle shot of the chimp tied up is then used, obviously to make it appear inferior and more like a victim. As we are given an outsiders point of view shot, simply observing the scene, we instantly feel a jolt of sympathy for the animal. And get the feeling that something is not quite humanly right. Then we see through a CCTV P.O.V shot, that intruders have somehow broken into the Facility. The fact that the activists are not supposed to be here is blatant from first sight, as we can see one is wearing a balaclava. When they  look around for something that we’re not yet sure of, we see them from behind windows which resemble bars, which perhaps foretells the narrative of humans being trapped and quarantined in Great Britain when the virus has taken over. This is a method used repeatedly throughout the film. As they enter their supposed destination, a room filled with caged and distressed chimps, they walk around showing their disgust, this is shown through close ups of their faces and the performance of the tears glistening in their eyes. Until a local scientist enters and warns them not to release the animals from their cells as they are contaminated with something he calls "Rage", but the activists pay no attention to him and set a chimp free. It immediately attacks and infects the activists and scientist. The action of this sequence is built up through use of very fast tracking of the characters by the camera. It quickly jumps from shot to shot as the tension builds when they release the chimpanzee. We also get a point of view shot of the chimp as it runs towards its first victim. The dark, blood red coloured lighting also gives us a further sense of fear, with red being the stereotypical colour of rage and the shaded, murky darkness adds confusion as to what exactly is going on as we can barely see the full performance. This pushes the audience to use their imagination and think for themselves in their heads, what attacking techniques the characters are actually using. This is a method used in many low budget productions such as this.

Join now!

After a brief silence and an abrupt jump, a temporal relation, to 28 days later, we see a shut eye in an extreme close-up shot. This brings the audience’s attention to the fact that he has just woken up, yet also brings subtle fear into the action, as for a split second we are not quite sure whether or not this is a human being, simply waking up, or one of the infected un-dead monsters. The camera then cuts to a high angle shot of the young man lying down on a bed, the mise-en-scene of the location tell us ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

*** This is a good essay, which has some excellent analysis of the effects of camerawork and mise-en-scene in the film. The written style is rather long-winded and lacks fluency. It would also benefit from paragraphing and proofreading, but the errors do not impede understanding.