Executive summary

The project report is on the planning of new features and applications for the mobile device especially MS office on mobile. Hand held devices (pocket PC and smart phones) are increasingly being used by information worker, high level executives and businessmen as it provides assistance and convenience of a conventional computer, in environments where carrying one would not be practicable. With enhanced features and tools it satisfies the business need on the go. But there are still many obstacles in the way of its usage. The fidelity in viewing is not complete and user finds some losses in the documents when he sees on the mobile device. Moreover the user many a times cannot make required changes because those edit features are not available. The increased popularity of share point and exchange in corporate require some new service to cater their needs. This is becoming important as most of the files are now on the share point, OWA (Outlook Web Access, WAC (Web Access Companion). Downloading attachments and then viewing on the mobile phone is very painful because of the bandwidth limitations and the file size. There are other factors such as limited user input capabilities, screen sizes, limited data storage and so on. In order to overcome this problems and limitations many solutions were proposed. To enhance viewing and editing many features were incorporated based on feedback from marketing and internal analysis. There were some new and creative solution provided to overcome the screen size and downloading files. To view files on share point /WAC/OWA several suggestions were discussed with their advantages and limitations which included a dedicated mobile server or enhancing browsing capabilities to hook to the web service provider.

Content

. Introduction

2. Related Work/Previous Similar Study

3. Implementation

4. Evaluation

5. Conclusions and Future Work

6. About the company

. Introduction

The internship project was part of a real OM7 (Office Mobile Seven) planning by Mobile Office team. This required end-to-end planning of one module on my behalf. It was expected to learn and provide feedback and suggest some new applications or improvement which can be implemented for the Windows Mobile user.

Office mobile is mostly used by information worker, top level executives and businessman. Due to the constraints in the processing speed and storage capacity many features of MS office are not available in the hand held device (Pocket Pc and mart phones). The planning team needed to prioritize the needs from the customer point of view and then depending upon the technical capabilities of the design team execute those plans. The major problems faced in the development of mobile applications were:

a) Intermittent connections - Unlike on the web, the wireless network connection is relatively unstable and is affected by factors such as coverage (you lose the connection in a tunnel) etc

b) Bandwidth limitations - For example - even when 3G coverage is available, the actual bandwidth is far less

c) The need for data storage on the client: If the device has no (or little) local storage, all data has to be downloaded every time. This is not optimal given intermittent and expensive bandwidth

d) Finally, and most importantly - A local application provides a richer user experience - especially for applications such as games and office.

There are other factors such as limited user input capabilities, screen sizes and so on. Some of the above factors are getting better (for example coverage black spots are decreasing) - but the overall user experience remains one of the most important factors.

Thus, the new release should try to find out solution to at least some of these problems. The plan should include proposals to develop mobile applications in such a fashion that the end user should not feel the need of personal computer or laptop on the move especially while using the office files. The architecture of browsing applications is changing and it can be used in such fashion that the user cannot distinguish distinctions between the browsing and downloading applications.

Based on the market research and other sources it was clear the viewing of office documents was more important than editing on the mobile device by the user. Hence lot of emphasis was given to get as close as 100% fidelity in viewing and then include some editing capabilities which are high in demand and usage. It is anticipated that there will be an increasing trend to use hand held device (pocket pc and smart phones) for accessing, viewing and editing files from different sources(exchange , SharePoint, internet). This is of great use for the user who is always on move and needs to be in touch with all the developments in his work domain. The main problems were of the fidelity in viewing and slow downloading speed. To overcome this problem several suggestions were discussed to provide user with high fidelity viewing and high performance.

2. Related Work/Previous Similar Study

There is not much work done in this segment which is publicly available and MS initiative in this domain is very new. Though there are lots of third party applications which provide similar service as office with even more number of features than office mobile. But there is no player for web based viewing of attachment on mobile device.

Some initiatives in the server based scenarios for mobile device are:

* 3i Consulting Group has rolled out the Mobile Workplace Server, which extends the SAP Business Workplace to any web-enabled mobile device from BlackBerry, Palm Pocket PC to a host of others. SAP users can access SAP Workflow to execute any decision-based deal.

* The Google Personalized Home, which lets people access Gmail, news, RSS feeds and other information from their personalized Google home page on mobile phones and PDAs. The service is free in the U.S. and works with any phone that contains an XHTML-capability.

Many of the solutions provided are very new in the industry and some applications are results of creative thinking (e.g. Ribbon features and collapsing columns in table are discussed later in the report).

3. Implementation

To start with the project, a detailed comparative analysis was done to see what all features are provided and supported in the mobile device. This would help in narrowing down the features which should be incorporated or improved in the next release. The comparative analysis is presented in tabular form:

General feature comparison (MS Word)

Feature Category

Feature Subcategory

Feature

Support Notes

Word-Standard

Word-Professional

Document Viewing

General

Consume a Information Right Management protected Document

Yes

Yes

Document Viewing

General

Smooth Scroll

Yes

Yes

Document Viewing

General

Comments

No

No

Document Viewing

General

Macros

No

No

Document Viewing

Text

Font Formatting

Courier New ,Tahoma ,Font effects supported

Yes

Yes

Document Viewing

Text

Alignment Formatting

Yes

Yes

Document Viewing

Text

Textbox

No

No

Document Viewing
Join now!


Text

Header/Footer

No

No

Document Viewing

Text

Signature line

No

No

Document Viewing

Text

Object

No

No

Document Viewing

Text

Show/Hide

For Excel their columns hide/unhide. In Word hidden text is not displayed on the device and there is no option to unhide it.

No

No

Document Viewing

Illustrations

Picture

Yes

Yes

Document Viewing

Illustrations

Clipart

No

No

Document Viewing

Illustrations

Shapes

No

No
...

This is a preview of the whole essay