How successful are soap operas in simulating reality? Should 'simulating reality' be the main goal of this genre?

Authors Avatar

Soap Operas

How Realistic Are Soap Operas?

I think that soap operas have to be realistic in a way because if they weren’t they would be considered as fiction or science fiction, and shown as a drama or movie rather than a long continuous series of episodes such as Coronation Street which  was first aired in 1960.

The soap must deal with factors that may occur in peoples’ lives, but in soap operas they tend to be exaggerated for viewer entertainment. This is also why a variety of people from all walks of life are cast in soaps, so the exaggeration occurs among a larger, more varied group of people, making the effect of entertainment greater, and increasing the chance that the public can relate to the show, which would in turn create more ratings for the soap.

Soaps are obviously not set about real families, which is why such dramatic events can occur that cause so many different opinions in the public. It is common to hear arguments about soaps such as Eastenders, for example when Jamie died, some people were glad to see the end of his character whereas many people, especially girls, were upset and crying because they couldn’t imagine the show without him.  

Join now!

After dramatic events take place in the show, the ratings tend to rise which is why soaps have slowly become more violent and socially involved… shows like Dallas based their entertainment around purely exaggerated fiction, but still kept an air of reality about it, but soaps today tend to exaggerate things which actually occur socially on a day-to-day basis such as drug abuse and domestic violence, which means today’s soaps would pick up much higher ratings than those of the 60’s and 70’s.

Do They Influence The Audience?

When people are able to relate to soap operas, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay