Investigate and evaluate a piece of historical evidence, the Hollywood movie The Patriot starred by Mel Gibson and Heath Ledger in order to determine whether or not it is reliable

Authors Avatar

        History is the study of the past, of what had really happened and who were involved. To study history itself, it is essential that the source from which the information were taken is factual as well as reliable. It is not acceptable if it contains errors and flaws or mixing the truth with some fictions. This essay will investigate and evaluate a piece of historical evidence, the Hollywood movie The Patriot starred by Mel Gibson and Heath Ledger in order to determine whether or not it is reliable and could be used to determine the events that really had happened during the American fight for Revolution.

        A way to determine the reliability of The Patriot as an accurate historical source is by knowing whether it is a primary or a secondary source of information. A primary source of historical information came from a person who was directly involved during the period of time or a document written during that period, such as diaries or the Declaration of Independence. In this case, this movie is considered as a secondary source. Some of the advantages of a primary source is that it brings the researcher as close as possible to what actually happened in the history and it is almost one hundred percent true. It helps to know what the people involved think and their individual viewpoints on certain events. However, the problem with primary source is that want it or not, historians will have to believe what was written on the source, since there will be not eyewitness three hundred years after the event. This is quite challenging, since the evidence itself might be biased and therefore makes it hard for historians to investigate its truthfulness. A secondary source, however, offers an easier interpretation of what was stated in a primary source. An example of a secondary source is an encyclopedia telling about what happened during the Revolution for Independence in America. The disadvantage is that it is not one hundred percent reliable. Since The Patriot is a secondary source, it certainly contains bias and therefore makes it quite hard for the audience to be sure of its reliability. The Patriot was made for the sake of Hollywood and not to share what happened in the American history through a thorough and complete documentation. Therefore, the script The Patriot itself will certainly reflects on how the scriptwriter think about the events and contains personal opinions on the subject.

        Relating to the point that had just been made, the reliability of a historical source also depend on the bias a source contained. What needs to be questioned is whether or not this movie is biased? As seen from an audience perspective, The Patriot is a biased movie because once again, it is a Hollywood movie with American crews and therefore they have their own ideas on how the events had occurred and why they thought they were right in pursuing independence rather that keeping peace with the Great Britain. If seen from the British perspective, the characters on the British side might not be that bad, especially Tavington who was portrayed as this incredulously mean and cold blooded antagonist. The actual fact as stated in many other reliable sources, Tarleton who was the inspiration was not even that coldblooded. In fact, he was known to be pretty decent from what was stated. And rather, the British would have their own ideas why they had risked the war and wanted to take hold of American colonists.

Another way in determining the reliability of a source for its historical factuality and accuracy is by analyzing corroborating the characters, events and battles mentioned and shown in the movie. As a fact, ‘The Patriot was not created as neither a historical source nor a documentary concerning the real-life events that happened during the American Revolutionary War. It was a Hollywood war and action movie with a little bit of drama to attract audiences who happened to be idolizing the stars or liked the theme, being made hundreds of years after the real incident. Therefore, the historical reliability needs to be analyzed before being convinced that all the aspects in this movie are factual and really existed during that time of the American Revolution.

Join now!

Several characters in The Patriot, however, were really inspired by and based on real historical figures. Benjamin Martin (Mel Gibson), the main character, a landowner and widowed father of seven children who later led the militia army, was based on a combination of several figures: Francis Marion, Elijah Clarke, Daniel Morgan, Andrew Pickens and Thomas Sumter. In the early drafts of the movie script, Francis Marion was used as the leading character, but because of some vague historical issues relating to how Marion mistreated his slaves and to avoid controversy in exposing a real historical figure as the main attraction, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

This essay is based upon spectacularly good factual research, but is weakened by a rather naive and limited idea of what constitutes "historical accuracy". It is good on facts, but weak on theories about facts, and this leads the essayist to limited and inaccurate conclusions despite their obvious intelligence and the depth of their research. Some further research into critical debates about realism and bias from within the discipline of History itself would compensate for this flaw. Still, an impressive piece of work for A level, demonstrating a good mixture of personal intelligence and researched knowledge that would ordinarily be expected from early university work, despite the questionable way it chooses to define accuracy and inaccuracy, 4 stars.